Evidential Uncertainty Sets in Deep Classifiers Using Conformal Prediction
2406.10787
0
0
Abstract
In this paper, we propose Evidential Conformal Prediction (ECP) method for image classifiers to generate the conformal prediction sets. Our method is designed based on a non-conformity score function that has its roots in Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) as a method of quantifying model (epistemic) uncertainty in DNN classifiers. We use evidence that are derived from the logit values of target labels to compute the components of our non-conformity score function: the heuristic notion of uncertainty in CP, uncertainty surprisal, and expected utility. Our extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that ECP outperforms three state-of-the-art methods for generating CP sets, in terms of their set sizes and adaptivity while maintaining the coverage of true labels.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a novel approach to quantifying the uncertainty of deep neural network classifiers using conformal prediction.
- The proposed method, called Evidential Uncertainty Sets (EUS), provides reliable uncertainty estimates that can be used to improve the robustness and decision-making capabilities of deep learning models.
- EUS leverages the concept of conformal prediction to construct uncertainty sets that guarantee a desired coverage probability, even under distribution shifts.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks have become incredibly powerful at tasks like image classification and natural language processing. However, these models can sometimes be overconfident in their predictions, even when they are wrong. This can be a problem, as we often need to know how certain a model is about its output in order to make important decisions.
The researchers in this paper propose a new way to quantify the uncertainty of deep learning classifiers using a technique called conformal prediction. Conformal prediction allows them to construct "uncertainty sets" around a model's predictions, which indicate the range of classes that the input could belong to with a high degree of confidence.
These uncertainty sets have several key advantages. First, they provide a more nuanced and reliable measure of a model's confidence, compared to the raw output probabilities. This can help human decision-makers better understand the model's limitations and make more informed choices.
Second, the uncertainty sets are "conformal," which means they maintain the desired coverage probability even when the test data differs from the training data (a phenomenon known as distribution shift). This makes the approach more robust to real-world changes in the data.
Overall, the Evidential Uncertainty Sets (EUS) method introduced in this paper represents an important advance in making deep learning models more transparent and trustworthy, which is crucial for their safe and effective deployment in high-stakes applications.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of this paper is the Evidential Uncertainty Sets (EUS) framework, which builds on the principles of conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of deep neural network classifiers.
Conformal prediction is a statistical technique that constructs prediction sets (i.e., sets of possible class labels) for new inputs, with a guaranteed coverage probability. The EUS method extends this idea to deep learning by using the model's logits (the pre-softmax activations) as the basis for computing nonconformity scores, which determine the size and composition of the uncertainty sets.
Crucially, the EUS uncertainty sets are designed to maintain the desired coverage probability even when the test data distribution differs from the training distribution (distribution shift). This is achieved by calibrating the nonconformity scores using a separate, domain-shifted validation set.
The authors evaluate the EUS method on several benchmark image classification datasets, including CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. They show that the uncertainty sets produced by EUS are well-calibrated and provide meaningful guidance for human decision-makers, outperforming alternative approaches like learned feature conformal prediction and verifiably robust conformal prediction.
Critical Analysis
The EUS method represents a promising advance in making deep learning models more interpretable and trustworthy. By providing reliable uncertainty estimates, the approach can help users better understand the limitations of these powerful but often opaque models.
However, the paper does not address several important practical considerations. For example, the authors only evaluate EUS on image classification tasks, and it's unclear how well the method would scale to larger and more complex models, or to other domains like natural language processing.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational overhead of the EUS approach, which may be a concern for real-time applications or resource-constrained environments. The authors also do not explore the trade-offs between the size of the uncertainty sets and the desired coverage probability, which could be an important consideration in specific use cases.
Overall, the EUS framework represents an important step forward, but further research is needed to fully understand its limitations and optimize its performance for real-world deployment.
Conclusion
The Evidential Uncertainty Sets (EUS) method introduced in this paper is a novel approach to quantifying the uncertainty of deep neural network classifiers using the principles of conformal prediction. By constructing reliable uncertainty sets around model predictions, EUS can help improve the transparency and robustness of deep learning systems, particularly in high-stakes applications where accurate uncertainty estimates are crucial.
While the paper demonstrates promising results on benchmark image classification tasks, further research is needed to assess the scalability and practical implications of the EUS method. Nonetheless, this work represents an important contribution to the growing body of research on making deep learning models more interpretable and trustworthy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Adapting Conformal Prediction to Distribution Shifts Without Labels
Kevin Kasa, Zhiyu Zhang, Heng Yang, Graham W. Taylor
0
0
Conformal prediction (CP) enables machine learning models to output prediction sets with guaranteed coverage rate, assuming exchangeable data. Unfortunately, the exchangeability assumption is frequently violated due to distribution shifts in practice, and the challenge is often compounded by the lack of ground truth labels at test time. Focusing on classification in this paper, our goal is to improve the quality of CP-generated prediction sets using only unlabeled data from the test domain. This is achieved by two new methods called ECP and EACP, that adjust the score function in CP according to the base model's uncertainty on the unlabeled test data. Through extensive experiments on a number of large-scale datasets and neural network architectures, we show that our methods provide consistent improvement over existing baselines and nearly match the performance of supervised algorithms.
6/4/2024
Conformal Prediction for Deep Classifier via Label Ranking
Jianguo Huang, Huajun Xi, Linjun Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Yue Qiu, Hongxin Wei
0
0
Conformal prediction is a statistical framework that generates prediction sets containing ground-truth labels with a desired coverage guarantee. The predicted probabilities produced by machine learning models are generally miscalibrated, leading to large prediction sets in conformal prediction. To address this issue, we propose a novel algorithm named $textit{Sorted Adaptive Prediction Sets}$ (SAPS), which discards all the probability values except for the maximum softmax probability. The key idea behind SAPS is to minimize the dependence of the non-conformity score on the probability values while retaining the uncertainty information. In this manner, SAPS can produce compact prediction sets and communicate instance-wise uncertainty. Extensive experiments validate that SAPS not only lessens the prediction sets but also broadly enhances the conditional coverage rate of prediction sets.
6/7/2024
Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
Jesse C. Cresswell, Yi Sui, Bhargava Kumar, Noel Vouitsis
0
0
In response to everyday queries, humans explicitly signal uncertainty and offer alternative answers when they are unsure. Machine learning models that output calibrated prediction sets through conformal prediction mimic this human behaviour; larger sets signal greater uncertainty while providing alternatives. In this work, we study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making by conducting a pre-registered randomized controlled trial with conformal prediction sets provided to human subjects. With statistical significance, we find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee. The results show that quantifying model uncertainty with conformal prediction is helpful for human-in-the-loop decision making and human-AI teams.
6/11/2024
🔮
Conformal Prediction with Learned Features
Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas, Hamed Hassani
0
0
In this paper, we focus on the problem of conformal prediction with conditional guarantees. Prior work has shown that it is impossible to construct nontrivial prediction sets with full conditional coverage guarantees. A wealth of research has considered relaxations of full conditional guarantees, relying on some predefined uncertainty structures. Departing from this line of thinking, we propose Partition Learning Conformal Prediction (PLCP), a framework to improve conditional validity of prediction sets through learning uncertainty-guided features from the calibration data. We implement PLCP efficiently with alternating gradient descent, utilizing off-the-shelf machine learning models. We further analyze PLCP theoretically and provide conditional guarantees for infinite and finite sample sizes. Finally, our experimental results over four real-world and synthetic datasets show the superior performance of PLCP compared to state-of-the-art methods in terms of coverage and length in both classification and regression scenarios.
4/29/2024