Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
2401.13744
2
0
Abstract
In response to everyday queries, humans explicitly signal uncertainty and offer alternative answers when they are unsure. Machine learning models that output calibrated prediction sets through conformal prediction mimic this human behaviour; larger sets signal greater uncertainty while providing alternatives. In this work, we study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making by conducting a pre-registered randomized controlled trial with conformal prediction sets provided to human subjects. With statistical significance, we find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee. The results show that quantifying model uncertainty with conformal prediction is helpful for human-in-the-loop decision making and human-AI teams.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Explores the use of conformal prediction sets to improve human decision-making
- Conformal prediction sets provide quantified uncertainty estimates alongside model predictions
- Study shows that conformal prediction sets can lead to better decision-making by humans compared to traditional point estimates
Plain English Explanation
Conformal prediction is a technique that can be used to provide quantified uncertainty estimates alongside the predictions made by machine learning models. Towards Human-AI Complementarity: Predictions Sets explains how these uncertainty estimates, presented in the form of prediction sets, can help improve human decision-making.
Traditionally, machine learning models have provided single point estimates as their output - for example, a model might predict that a certain medical test result will be positive. However, these point estimates don't convey any information about how certain the model is about its prediction. In contrast, conformal prediction sets provide a range of possible values, along with a guarantee that the true value will fall within that range with a specified level of confidence.
The researchers conducted experiments where human participants were asked to make decisions based on either traditional point estimates or conformal prediction sets. The results showed that when people were provided with the uncertainty information from the conformal prediction sets, they made better decisions overall compared to when they only had the point estimates. This suggests that quantifying and communicating model uncertainty can be a valuable tool for improving human-AI collaboration and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the use of conformal prediction to generate prediction sets that can improve human decision-making. Conformal prediction is a framework for constructing prediction sets that come with valid, computable uncertainty guarantees.
In the experiments, the researchers asked human participants to make decisions based on either traditional point estimates or conformal prediction sets generated by machine learning models. The tasks involved binary classification problems, such as predicting whether a patient has a certain medical condition.
The conformal prediction sets provided a range of possible values for the model's output, along with a guarantee that the true value would fall within that range with a specified level of confidence (e.g. 90%). In contrast, the traditional point estimates only provided a single predicted value without any quantified uncertainty.
The results showed that when people were provided with the conformal prediction sets, they made better decisions overall compared to when they only had the point estimates. This was true across a variety of decision-making tasks and metrics, including accuracy, calibration, and expected utility.
The researchers attribute these improvements to the fact that the conformal prediction sets allowed participants to better understand and reason about the model's uncertainty. This, in turn, led to more informed and higher-quality decisions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how conformal prediction sets can improve human decision-making compared to traditional point estimates. The experimental design and analysis seem rigorous, and the results are generally convincing.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively simple nature of the tasks and decision-making scenarios explored. While the binary classification problems are a useful starting point, it would be interesting to see how the findings scale to more complex, real-world decision-making tasks that involve greater uncertainty and ambiguity.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the cognitive mechanisms underlying the observed improvements in decision-making. Further research could investigate how people interpret and utilize the uncertainty information provided by the conformal prediction sets, and whether there are individual differences or contextual factors that influence their effectiveness.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the growing body of work on conformal prediction and its applications in human-AI interaction. The findings suggest that quantifying and communicating model uncertainty can be a valuable tool for enhancing human-AI complementarity and decision-making.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that incorporating conformal prediction sets into machine learning models can lead to better decision-making by human users compared to traditional point estimates. By providing quantified uncertainty information, conformal prediction sets allow people to better understand the limitations and reliability of the model's outputs, and make more informed decisions as a result.
The results have significant implications for the design of AI systems that are intended to assist or augment human decision-making, whether in medical diagnosis, financial planning, or other high-stakes domains. Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction and A Comparative Study of Conformal Prediction Methods for Valid Uncertainty are two additional papers that explore related aspects of conformal prediction and its applications.
Overall, this research highlights the importance of not just developing accurate machine learning models, but also effectively communicating their uncertainties to human users. By bridging the gap between AI capabilities and human decision-making, conformal prediction sets have the potential to enhance human-AI complementarity and lead to better outcomes across a wide range of domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Predictions Sets
Giovanni De Toni, Nastaran Okati, Suhas Thejaswi, Eleni Straitouri, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
0
0
Decision support systems based on prediction sets have proven to be effective at helping human experts solve classification tasks. Rather than providing single-label predictions, these systems provide sets of label predictions constructed using conformal prediction, namely prediction sets, and ask human experts to predict label values from these sets. In this paper, we first show that the prediction sets constructed using conformal prediction are, in general, suboptimal in terms of average accuracy. Then, we show that the problem of finding the optimal prediction sets under which the human experts achieve the highest average accuracy is NP-hard. More strongly, unless P = NP, we show that the problem is hard to approximate to any factor less than the size of the label set. However, we introduce a simple and efficient greedy algorithm that, for a large class of expert models and non-conformity scores, is guaranteed to find prediction sets that provably offer equal or greater performance than those constructed using conformal prediction. Further, using a simulation study with both synthetic and real expert predictions, we demonstrate that, in practice, our greedy algorithm finds near-optimal prediction sets offering greater performance than conformal prediction.
5/29/2024
🔮
An Information Theoretic Perspective on Conformal Prediction
Alvaro H. C. Correia, Fabio Valerio Massoli, Christos Louizos, Arash Behboodi
0
0
Conformal Prediction (CP) is a distribution-free uncertainty estimation framework that constructs prediction sets guaranteed to contain the true answer with a user-specified probability. Intuitively, the size of the prediction set encodes a general notion of uncertainty, with larger sets associated with higher degrees of uncertainty. In this work, we leverage information theory to connect conformal prediction to other notions of uncertainty. More precisely, we prove three different ways to upper bound the intrinsic uncertainty, as described by the conditional entropy of the target variable given the inputs, by combining CP with information theoretical inequalities. Moreover, we demonstrate two direct and useful applications of such connection between conformal prediction and information theory: (i) more principled and effective conformal training objectives that generalize previous approaches and enable end-to-end training of machine learning models from scratch, and (ii) a natural mechanism to incorporate side information into conformal prediction. We empirically validate both applications in centralized and federated learning settings, showing our theoretical results translate to lower inefficiency (average prediction set size) for popular CP methods.
5/6/2024
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024
🔮
Conformal Prediction for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Margarida M. Campos, Ant'onio Farinhas, Chrysoula Zerva, M'ario A. T. Figueiredo, Andr'e F. T. Martins
0
0
The rapid proliferation of large language models and natural language processing (NLP) applications creates a crucial need for uncertainty quantification to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and to enhance decision-making reliability in critical applications. Conformal prediction is emerging as a theoretically sound and practically useful framework, combining flexibility with strong statistical guarantees. Its model-agnostic and distribution-free nature makes it particularly promising to address the current shortcomings of NLP systems that stem from the absence of uncertainty quantification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques, their guarantees, and existing applications in NLP, pointing to directions for future research and open challenges.
5/6/2024