Expected Runtime Comparisons Between Breadth-First Search and Constant-Depth Restarting Random Walks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper compares the expected runtime of two algorithms for searching a graph: breadth-first search (BFS) and constant-depth restarting random walks.
- BFS is a systematic graph traversal algorithm that explores all the neighbors at the present depth before moving on to the neighbors at the next depth level.
- Constant-depth restarting random walks involve randomly exploring the graph up to a fixed depth, then restarting the search from the starting node.
- The paper aims to provide theoretical insights into the relative performance of these two approaches in different graph settings.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you're trying to find a specific location in a maze. Breadth-first search is like systematically checking every room on the same level before moving to the next level. On the other hand, constant-depth restarting random walks are like randomly exploring the maze up to a certain depth, then starting over from the beginning. This paper looks at how the expected time it takes to find the location compares between these two strategies in different types of mazes.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the expected runtime of BFS and constant-depth restarting random walks on various graph structures. The analysis involves:
- Modeling the graphs as random geometric graphs, where nodes are randomly placed in a space and connected if they are close enough.
- Deriving upper and lower bounds on the expected runtime of each algorithm as a function of the graph parameters, such as the number of nodes and the connection radius.
- Comparing the bounds to understand how the relative performance of the two algorithms changes based on the graph structure.
The key insights are that:
- For sparse graphs, constant-depth restarting random walks can outperform BFS in terms of expected runtime.
- For dense graphs, BFS tends to be more efficient than constant-depth restarting random walks.
- The performance gap between the two algorithms can be substantial, especially in certain graph regimes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the relative performance of BFS and constant-depth restarting random walks. However, it is important to note that the analysis is based on idealized random geometric graph models, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world graph structures.
Additionally, the paper does not consider other factors that may influence algorithm performance in practical settings, such as memory constraints, parallelization, or the availability of additional information about the graph topology.
Further empirical studies and comparisons on more diverse graph types and real-world applications would be valuable to better understand the practical implications of the theoretical insights presented in this work.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed theoretical comparison of the expected runtime of breadth-first search and constant-depth restarting random walks on various graph structures. The key finding is that the relative performance of these two algorithms can vary significantly depending on the underlying graph properties, with constant-depth restarting random walks potentially outperforming BFS in sparse graph regimes.
These insights could have important implications for the design and selection of graph search algorithms in a range of applications, from route planning to social network analysis. However, further research is needed to understand the practical relevance and limitations of the theoretical results presented in this work.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Expected Runtime Comparisons Between Breadth-First Search and Constant-Depth Restarting Random Walks
Daniel Platnick, Richard Anthony Valenzano
When greedy search algorithms encounter a local minima or plateau, the search typically devolves into a breadth-first search (BrFS), or a local search technique is used in an attempt to find a way out. In this work, we formally analyze the performance of BrFS and constant-depth restarting random walks (RRW) -- two methods often used for finding exits to a plateau/local minima -- to better understand when each is best suited. In particular, we formally derive the expected runtime for BrFS in the case of a uniformly distributed set of goals at a given goal depth. We then prove RRW will be faster than BrFS on trees if there are enough goals at that goal depth. We refer to this threshold as the crossover point. Our bound shows that the crossover point grows linearly with the branching factor of the tree, the goal depth, and the error in the random walk depth, while the size of the tree grows exponentially in branching factor and goal depth. Finally, we discuss the practical implications and applicability of this bound.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Frustrated Random Walks: A Fast Method to Compute Node Distances on Hypergraphs
Enzhi Li, Scott Nickleach, Bilal Fadlallah
A hypergraph is a generalization of a graph that arises naturally when attribute-sharing among entities is considered. Compared to graphs, hypergraphs have the distinct advantage that they contain explicit communities and are more convenient to manipulate. An open problem in hypergraph research is how to accurately and efficiently calculate node distances on hypergraphs. Estimating node distances enables us to find a node's nearest neighbors, which has important applications in such areas as recommender system, targeted advertising, etc. In this paper, we propose using expected hitting times of random walks to compute hypergraph node distances. We note that simple random walks (SRW) cannot accurately compute node distances on highly complex real-world hypergraphs, which motivates us to introduce frustrated random walks (FRW) for this task. We further benchmark our method against DeepWalk, and show that while the latter can achieve comparable results, FRW has a distinct computational advantage in cases where the number of targets is fairly small. For such cases, we show that FRW runs in significantly shorter time than DeepWalk. Finally, we analyze the time complexity of our method, and show that for large and sparse hypergraphs, the complexity is approximately linear, rendering it superior to the DeepWalk alternative.
Read more8/28/2024
🌀
0
Self-Duplicating Random Walks for Resilient Decentralized Learning on Graphs
Maximilian Egger, Ghadir Ayache, Rawad Bitar, Antonia Wachter-Zeh, Salim El Rouayheb
Consider the setting of multiple random walks (RWs) on a graph executing a certain computational task. For instance, in decentralized learning via RWs, a model is updated at each iteration based on the local data of the visited node and then passed to a randomly chosen neighbor. RWs can fail due to node or link failures. The goal is to maintain a desired number of RWs to ensure failure resilience. Achieving this is challenging due to the lack of a central entity to track which RWs have failed to replace them with new ones by forking (duplicating) surviving ones. Without duplications, the number of RWs will eventually go to zero, causing a catastrophic failure of the system. We propose a decentralized algorithm called DECAFORK that can maintain the number of RWs in the graph around a desired value even in the presence of arbitrary RW failures. Nodes continuously estimate the number of surviving RWs by estimating their return time distribution and fork the RWs when failures are likely to happen. We present extensive numerical simulations that show the performance of DECAFORK regarding fast detection and reaction to failures. We further present theoretical guarantees on the performance of this algorithm.
Read more7/17/2024
📶
0
Random Function Descent
Felix Benning, Leif Doring
Classical worst-case optimization theory neither explains the success of optimization in machine learning, nor does it help with step size selection. We establish a connection between Bayesian Optimization (i.e. average case optimization theory) and classical optimization using a 'stochastic Taylor approximation' to rediscover gradient descent. This rediscovery yields a step size schedule we call Random Function Descent (RFD), which, in contrast to classical derivations, is scale invariant. Furthermore, our analysis of RFD step sizes yields a theoretical foundation for common step size heuristics such as gradient clipping and gradual learning rate warmup. We finally propose a statistical procedure for estimating the RFD step size schedule and validate this theory with a case study on the MNIST dataset.
Read more6/11/2024