Expediting and Elevating Large Language Model Reasoning via Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Expedites and enhances large language model reasoning by decoding "hidden" chain-of-thought steps
- Improves performance on challenging reasoning tasks without additional training
- Provides a new technique for interpreting and understanding the inner workings of large language models
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like GPT-3 have become incredibly capable at understanding and generating human-like text. However, their internal decision-making process is often opaque, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their outputs.
This paper introduces a technique called "Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding" that aims to make that process more transparent. The key idea is to not only look at the final answer produced by the model, but also decode the intermediate "steps" or "thoughts" that led to that answer.
By surfacing these hidden reasoning steps, the researchers found they could significantly improve the model's performance on challenging reasoning tasks, without needing to retrain or fine-tune the original model. In essence, they were able to "expedite and elevate" the model's reasoning capabilities.
This is an important advancement because it provides a window into the "black box" of large language models. Understanding their inner workings can help us build more robust, trustworthy, and interpretable AI systems going forward.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new method called "Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding" (HCTD) that aims to make the reasoning process of large language models more interpretable and effective.
The key innovation is to not just look at the final output of the model, but to also decode the intermediate "reasoning steps" or "thoughts" that led to that output. This is done by prompting the model to generate a chain of reasoning, rather than just the final answer.
Through experiments on challenging reasoning tasks, the researchers found that by decoding and inspecting these hidden reasoning steps, they could significantly improve the model's performance, without requiring any additional training. This suggests that the model's reasoning capabilities are more powerful than what is reflected in its final outputs alone.
The paper provides a detailed technical description of the HCTD method, including the prompting approach, decoding algorithm, and evaluation on benchmark reasoning tasks. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this new technique in expediting and elevating large language model reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for interpreting and enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By decoding the hidden chain-of-thought steps, the researchers were able to unlock additional cognitive capabilities that were not evident in the final model outputs alone.
That said, the paper does not address some potential limitations and caveats of this technique. For example, it's unclear how sensitive the method is to the specific prompting approach used, or how well it would generalize to a wider range of reasoning tasks and model architectures.
Additionally, while the performance improvements are significant, the paper does not provide a deep analysis of the types of reasoning steps that the model is able to uncover. A more detailed examination of the internal decision-making process could yield additional insights.
Overall, the Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding technique represents an important step forward in making large language models more transparent and effective. Further research is needed to fully understand the scope and limitations of this approach, but the results presented in this paper are quite compelling.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel technique called "Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding" that aims to expedite and elevate the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By decoding the intermediate reasoning steps used by the model, rather than just looking at the final output, the researchers were able to significantly improve performance on challenging tasks.
This work provides a valuable new tool for interpreting and understanding the inner workings of large language models, which are often opaque "black boxes." By surfacing these hidden reasoning processes, we can build more robust, trustworthy, and interpretable AI systems that can better explain their decision-making.
While the paper presents promising results, further research is needed to fully understand the scope and limitations of this approach. Nonetheless, the Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding technique represents an important advancement in the field of large language model interpretation and reasoning enhancement.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Expediting and Elevating Large Language Model Reasoning via Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding
Tianqiao Liu, Zui Chen, Zitao Liu, Mi Tian, Weiqi Luo
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tasks requiring reasoning and multi-step problem-solving through the use of chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. However, generating the full CoT process results in significantly longer output sequences, leading to increased computational costs and latency during inference. To address this challenge, we propose a novel approach to compress the CoT process through semantic alignment, enabling more efficient decoding while preserving the benefits of CoT reasoning. Our method introduces an auxiliary CoT model that learns to generate and compress the full thought process into a compact special token representation semantically aligned with the original CoT output. This compressed representation is then integrated into the input of the Hidden Chain-of-Thought (HCoT) model. The training process follows a two-stage procedure: First, the CoT model is optimized to generate the compressed token representations aligned with the ground-truth CoT outputs using a contrastive loss. Subsequently, with the CoT model parameters frozen, the HCoT model is fine-tuned to generate accurate subsequent predictions conditioned on the prefix instruction and the compressed CoT representations from the CoT model. Extensive experiments across three challenging domains - mathematical reasoning, agent invocation, and question answering - demonstrate that our semantic compression approach achieves competitive or improved performance compared to the full CoT baseline, while providing significant speedups of at least 1.5x in decoding time. Moreover, incorporating contrastive learning objectives further enhances the quality of the compressed representations, leading to better CoT prompting and improved task accuracy. Our work paves the way for more efficient exploitation of multi-step reasoning capabilities in LLMs across a wide range of applications.
Read more9/16/2024
🌿
65
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
Xuezhi Wang, Denny Zhou
In enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prior research primarily focuses on specific prompting techniques such as few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. These methods, while effective, often involve manually intensive prompt engineering. Our study takes a novel approach by asking: Can LLMs reason effectively without prompting? Our findings reveal that, intriguingly, CoT reasoning paths can be elicited from pre-trained LLMs by simply altering the textit{decoding} process. Rather than conventional greedy decoding, we investigate the top-$k$ alternative tokens, uncovering that CoT paths are frequently inherent in these sequences. This approach not only bypasses the confounders of prompting but also allows us to assess the LLMs' textit{intrinsic} reasoning abilities. Moreover, we observe that the presence of a CoT in the decoding path correlates with a higher confidence in the model's decoded answer. This confidence metric effectively differentiates between CoT and non-CoT paths. Extensive empirical studies on various reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed CoT-decoding effectively elicits reasoning capabilities from language models, which were previously obscured by standard greedy decoding.
Read more5/27/2024
💬
28
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Break the Chain: Large Language Models Can be Shortcut Reasoners
Mengru Ding, Hanmeng Liu, Zhizhang Fu, Jian Song, Wenbo Xie, Yue Zhang
Recent advancements in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning utilize complex modules but are hampered by high token consumption, limited applicability, and challenges in reproducibility. This paper conducts a critical evaluation of CoT prompting, extending beyond arithmetic to include complex logical and commonsense reasoning tasks, areas where standard CoT methods fall short. We propose the integration of human-like heuristics and shortcuts into language models (LMs) through break the chain strategies. These strategies disrupt traditional CoT processes using controlled variables to assess their efficacy. Additionally, we develop innovative zero-shot prompting strategies that encourage the use of shortcuts, enabling LMs to quickly exploit reasoning clues and bypass detailed procedural steps. Our comprehensive experiments across various LMs, both commercial and open-source, reveal that LMs maintain effective performance with break the chain strategies. We also introduce ShortcutQA, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate reasoning through shortcuts, compiled from competitive tests optimized for heuristic reasoning tasks such as forward/backward reasoning and simplification. Our analysis confirms that ShortcutQA not only poses a robust challenge to LMs but also serves as an essential benchmark for enhancing reasoning efficiency in AI.
Read more6/12/2024