Explainable AI: Definition and attributes of a good explanation for health AI

Overview

• As AI systems become more complex, their inner workings and decision-making processes become less transparent.
• This lack of transparency is a concern in safety-critical domains like healthcare, where understanding how an AI system reaches a recommendation is crucial for accountability and safety.
• Explainable AI (XAI) aims to address this issue by providing explanations for AI decisions, but defining what constitutes a good explanation remains a challenge.

Plain English Explanation

In the world of artificial intelligence (AI), researchers are developing increasingly sophisticated predictive models that can be applied across many different fields. However, as these models become more complex, it can be difficult for users to understand how the AI is actually making its decisions. This is a particular concern in the healthcare sector, where AI systems are being used to make recommendations that could have serious consequences for patient safety.

The field of explainable AI (XAI) aims to address this issue by providing explanations for how an AI system arrives at its conclusions. But defining what makes a "good" explanation is still a challenge. To better understand this, researchers in this study examined existing literature and gathered expert opinions through a Delphi study. The goal was to come up with a definition of what an explanation in healthcare AI actually is, as well as the key attributes that characterize a high-quality explanation.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a two-round Delphi study to gather expert opinions on what constitutes a good explanation in the context of healthcare AI systems. They first reviewed the published literature on explainable AI to establish a foundation for the study.

In the Delphi process, the researchers solicited feedback from a panel of experts in fields like medicine, medical informatics, and AI. Over two rounds, the experts were asked to provide their thoughts on the definition of an explanation in health-AI and the key attributes of a good explanation. The researchers then synthesized the responses to develop a consensus on these important questions.

The key outputs of the study were:

1. A definition of what constitutes an explanation in health-AI
2. A comprehensive list of attributes that characterize a good explanation in health-AI

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that defining what makes a "good" explanation for a healthcare AI system is a complex and subjective task. Different stakeholders (e.g. clinicians, patients, regulators) may have varying perspectives on the most important attributes.

Additionally, the study relied on expert opinions collected through a Delphi process, which has limitations in terms of sample size and potential for bias. The researchers did not validate the proposed definition and attributes through empirical testing or user studies.

Further research would be needed to fully understand how end-users perceive and utilize different types of explanations in real-world healthcare settings. Exploring the trade-offs between explanation fidelity, understandability, and cognitive load would also be an important area for future work.

Conclusion

This study represents an important step towards addressing the critical issue of transparency and explainability in healthcare AI systems. By defining what constitutes a good explanation and outlining key attributes, the researchers have provided a foundation for developing XAI approaches that can truly empower users and support safe and accountable AI-powered healthcare.

As AI continues to play a growing role in medical decision-making, ensuring that these systems are not just accurate, but also understandable and trustworthy, will be essential for realizing the full potential of this transformative technology.