The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the necessity of explanation for healthcare AI systems to ensure trust and transparency.
- It emphasizes the importance of interpretability and explainability in AI-powered medical decision-making to enhance user trust and understanding.
- The paper reviews the current state of research on interpretable machine learning and explainable AI (XAI) in the healthcare domain.
- It outlines key requirements and challenges in developing interpretable and explainable AI systems for medical applications.
Plain English Explanation
As AI systems become more widely used in healthcare, it is crucial that they are not only accurate but also trustworthy and easily understood by both medical professionals and patients. The paper emphasizes the need for AI systems in healthcare to be interpretable and explainable.
Interpretability means that the inner workings of the AI system can be understood and the reasoning behind its decisions can be clearly explained. Explainability refers to the ability to provide a clear justification for the AI's outputs in a way that is meaningful to users.
This is particularly important in the medical field, where critical decisions that impact people's health and lives are being made. Doctors, nurses, and patients need to trust the AI system and understand how it arrived at its recommendations or diagnoses. Without this transparency and understanding, there is a risk of AI being seen as a "black box" that cannot be fully trusted.
The paper reviews the current research on interpretable machine learning and explainable AI in healthcare, outlining the key requirements and challenges in developing these capabilities. It emphasizes the need for AI systems to be able to explain their decisions in a way that is tailored to the needs and level of understanding of the various stakeholders, from medical professionals to patients.
Overall, the paper makes a strong case for the necessity of explanation in healthcare AI systems to ensure they are trusted, accepted, and used effectively to improve patient outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The paper discusses the importance of interpretability and explainability in AI-powered medical decision-making. It reviews the current state of research on interpretable machine learning and explainable AI (XAI) in the healthcare domain.
The paper outlines key requirements for developing interpretable and explainable AI systems for medical applications. These include the ability to provide clear justifications for the AI's outputs, tailor explanations to the needs and understanding of different stakeholders (e.g., doctors, nurses, patients), and ensure the interpretability and explainability of the system's decision-making process.
The paper also discusses the challenges in achieving these goals, such as the complexity of medical data and decision-making, the need to balance interpretability with model performance, and the potential for biases and errors in the explanations provided by the AI system.
The paper emphasizes the importance of interpretability and explainability in healthcare AI to enhance trust, transparency, and user understanding, ultimately leading to more effective and responsible use of these technologies in medical decision-making.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the necessity of explanation in healthcare AI systems, but it also acknowledges the significant challenges in achieving this goal. One potential limitation is the difficulty in balancing interpretability with model performance, as more transparent models may sacrifice some accuracy or predictive power.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases and errors that could arise in the explanations provided by AI systems, which is an important consideration given the high-stakes nature of medical decision-making. Further research is needed to understand and mitigate these issues.
The paper also does not address the potential resistance or skepticism from medical professionals and patients towards AI-powered decision-making, even if the system is highly interpretable and explainable. Building trust and acceptance may require additional strategies beyond just improving the system's transparency.
Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the importance of interpretable and explainable AI in healthcare, but more work is needed to fully address the technical, ethical, and practical challenges in this domain.
Conclusion
The paper emphasizes the critical need for explanation in healthcare AI systems to ensure trust, transparency, and effective use of these technologies. By making the inner workings of AI systems interpretable and providing clear, tailored explanations for their outputs, the healthcare industry can unlock the full potential of AI to improve patient outcomes while maintaining the trust and understanding of medical professionals and patients.
The research reviewed in this paper lays the groundwork for future developments in human-centric explainable AI that are specifically designed to enhance trust and decision-making in the medical field. As AI continues to play an increasingly important role in healthcare, the importance of explanation will only become more crucial.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI
Michail Mamalakis, H'eloise de Vareilles, Graham Murray, Pietro Lio, John Suckling
Explainability is often critical to the acceptable implementation of artificial intelligence (AI). Nowhere is this more important than healthcare where decision-making directly impacts patients and trust in AI systems is essential. This trust is often built on the explanations and interpretations the AI provides. Despite significant advancements in AI interpretability, there remains the need for clear guidelines on when and to what extent explanations are necessary in the medical context. We propose a novel categorization system with four distinct classes of explanation necessity, guiding the level of explanation required: patient or sample (local) level, cohort or dataset (global) level, or both levels. We introduce a mathematical formulation that distinguishes these categories and offers a practical framework for researchers to determine the necessity and depth of explanations required in medical AI applications. Three key factors are considered: the robustness of the evaluation protocol, the variability of expert observations, and the representation dimensionality of the application. In this perspective, we address the question: When does an AI medical application need to be explained, and at what level of detail?
Read more6/4/2024
🤖
0
Explainable AI: Definition and attributes of a good explanation for health AI
Evangelia Kyrimi, Scott McLachlan, Jared M Wohlgemut, Zane B Perkins, David A. Lagnado, William Marsh, the ExAIDSS Expert Group
Proposals of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions based on increasingly complex and accurate predictive models are becoming ubiquitous across many disciplines. As the complexity of these models grows, transparency and users' understanding often diminish. This suggests that accurate prediction alone is insufficient for making an AI-based solution truly useful. In the development of healthcare systems, this introduces new issues related to accountability and safety. Understanding how and why an AI system makes a recommendation may require complex explanations of its inner workings and reasoning processes. Although research on explainable AI (XAI) has significantly increased in recent years and there is high demand for XAI in medicine, defining what constitutes a good explanation remains ad hoc, and providing adequate explanations continues to be challenging. To fully realize the potential of AI, it is critical to address two fundamental questions about explanations for safety-critical AI applications, such as health-AI: (1) What is an explanation in health-AI? and (2) What are the attributes of a good explanation in health-AI? In this study, we examined published literature and gathered expert opinions through a two-round Delphi study. The research outputs include (1) a definition of what constitutes an explanation in health-AI and (2) a comprehensive list of attributes that characterize a good explanation in health-AI.
Read more9/25/2024
0
Explainable AI needs formal notions of explanation correctness
Stefan Haufe, Rick Wilming, Benedict Clark, Rustam Zhumagambetov, Danny Panknin, Ahc`ene Boubekki
The use of machine learning (ML) in critical domains such as medicine poses risks and requires regulation. One requirement is that decisions of ML systems in high-risk applications should be human-understandable. The field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) seemingly addresses this need. However, in its current form, XAI is unfit to provide quality control for ML; it itself needs scrutiny. Popular XAI methods cannot reliably answer important questions about ML models, their training data, or a given test input. We recapitulate results demonstrating that popular XAI methods systematically attribute importance to input features that are independent of the prediction target. This limits their utility for purposes such as model and data (in)validation, model improvement, and scientific discovery. We argue that the fundamental reason for this limitation is that current XAI methods do not address well-defined problems and are not evaluated against objective criteria of explanation correctness. Researchers should formally define the problems they intend to solve first and then design methods accordingly. This will lead to notions of explanation correctness that can be theoretically verified and objective metrics of explanation performance that can be assessed using ground-truth data.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction
Melkamu Mersha, Khang Lam, Joseph Wood, Ali AlShami, Jugal Kalita
Artificial intelligence models encounter significant challenges due to their black-box nature, particularly in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses these challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. However, there remains a gap in the literature as there are no comprehensive reviews that delve into the detailed mathematical representations, design methodologies of XAI models, and other associated aspects. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas. The survey is aimed at XAI researchers, XAI practitioners, AI model developers, and XAI beneficiaries who are interested in enhancing the trustworthiness, transparency, accountability, and fairness of their AI models.
Read more9/4/2024