An Explanatory Model Steering System for Collaboration between Domain Experts and AI

Read original: arXiv:2405.13038 - Published 5/24/2024 by Aditya Bhattacharya, Simone Stumpf, Katrien Verbert
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • As AI systems become more widely used in high-stake domains like healthcare, effective collaboration between domain experts and AI is crucial.
  • The researchers introduce an Explanatory Model Steering system that allows domain experts to use their knowledge to guide and refine prediction models.
  • The system includes an explanation dashboard with different types of explanations, and enables manual and automated data configuration approaches for model steering.
  • The system was evaluated through three extensive user studies with 174 healthcare experts, highlighting the importance of involving domain experts in the model steering process.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new system that helps domain experts, like doctors or nurses, work together with AI models to make important decisions. As AI becomes more common in fields like healthcare, it's vital that the experts who know the most about the field can guide and improve the AI models.

The researchers created a special dashboard that combines different types of information to help the experts understand how the AI model is working. This allows the experts to use their own knowledge to adjust the data the model is trained on, and fine-tune the model to make better predictions. [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/explaining-expert-search-team-formation-systems-exes]

The system was tested extensively with 174 healthcare professionals. The results showed that actively involving the domain experts in steering the AI model led to better collaboration between the humans and the AI, and ultimately, improved the model's performance. [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/explainable-interface-human-autonomy-teaming-survey, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/incorporating-explanations-into-human-machine-interfaces-trust]

The key idea is to leverage the deep knowledge that human experts have about their field, and enable them to apply that knowledge to refine and improve the AI models that are being used to make important decisions. [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dynamic-model-performative-human-ml-collaboration-theory, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/designing-interpretable-ml-system-to-enhance-trust]

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces an "Explanatory Model Steering" system that allows domain experts to steer prediction models using their own knowledge and expertise. The system includes an explanation dashboard that combines different types of data-centric and model-centric explanations, enabling the experts to understand how the model is making decisions.

The system supports both manual and automated approaches for configuring the underlying training data and refining the prediction models. This allows the domain experts to directly apply their prior knowledge to improve the model's performance.

The researchers evaluated the model steering system in a healthcare-focused scenario, conducting three extensive user studies with 174 healthcare experts. The findings highlight the importance of involving domain experts during the model steering process, as it leads to improved human-AI collaboration and better model performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of enabling domain experts to actively steer and refine AI prediction models, particularly in high-stake domains like healthcare. The robust user studies with 174 experts provide strong empirical support for the value of the model steering approach.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or challenges, such as the scalability of the approach when dealing with large, complex models, or the potential biases that domain experts may introduce when configuring the training data. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the long-term implications of this level of human-AI collaboration, or how it may impact the development and deployment of AI systems in the future.

Despite these minor shortcomings, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in enhancing human-AI collaboration and improving the trustworthiness and performance of AI systems in high-stake domains. [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dynamic-model-performative-human-ml-collaboration-theory, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/designing-interpretable-ml-system-to-enhance-trust]

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel Explanatory Model Steering system that enables domain experts to actively guide and refine AI prediction models using their own knowledge and expertise. The extensive user studies conducted with 174 healthcare professionals demonstrate the value of this approach, as it leads to improved human-AI collaboration and better model performance in high-stake domains.

The research highlights the importance of bridging the gap between domain experts and AI systems, and suggests that empowering experts to steer and refine models can be a key step towards building more trustworthy and effective AI applications. As AI continues to be adopted in critical areas, this type of human-AI collaboration will likely become increasingly important for ensuring the responsible and beneficial deployment of these technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

An Explanatory Model Steering System for Collaboration between Domain Experts and AI

Aditya Bhattacharya, Simone Stumpf, Katrien Verbert

With the increasing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in high-stake domains, such as healthcare, effective collaboration between domain experts and AI is imperative. To facilitate effective collaboration between domain experts and AI systems, we introduce an Explanatory Model Steering system that allows domain experts to steer prediction models using their domain knowledge. The system includes an explanation dashboard that combines different types of data-centric and model-centric explanations and allows prediction models to be steered through manual and automated data configuration approaches. It allows domain experts to apply their prior knowledge for configuring the underlying training data and refining prediction models. Additionally, our model steering system has been evaluated for a healthcare-focused scenario with 174 healthcare experts through three extensive user studies. Our findings highlight the importance of involving domain experts during model steering, ultimately leading to improved human-AI collaboration.

Read more

5/24/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Interdisciplinary Expertise to Advance Equitable Explainable AI

Chloe R. Bennett, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephanie Farquhar, Naama Haamel, Boris Babenko, Oran Lang, Mat Fleck, Ilana Traynis, Charles Lau, Ivor Horn, Courtney Lyles

The field of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly influencing health and healthcare, but bias and poor performance persists for populations who face widespread structural oppression. Previous work has clearly outlined the need for more rigorous attention to data representativeness and model performance to advance equity and reduce bias. However, there is an opportunity to also improve the explainability of AI by leveraging best practices of social epidemiology and health equity to help us develop hypotheses for associations found. In this paper, we focus on explainable AI (XAI) and describe a framework for interdisciplinary expert panel review to discuss and critically assess AI model explanations from multiple perspectives and identify areas of bias and directions for future research. We emphasize the importance of the interdisciplinary expert panel to produce more accurate, equitable interpretations which are historically and contextually informed. Interdisciplinary panel discussions can help reduce bias, identify potential confounders, and identify opportunities for additional research where there are gaps in the literature. In turn, these insights can suggest opportunities for AI model improvement.

Read more

6/28/2024

Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Total Score

0

Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration

Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland

Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.

Read more

6/13/2024

Improving Health Professionals' Onboarding with AI and XAI for Trustworthy Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making
Total Score

0

Improving Health Professionals' Onboarding with AI and XAI for Trustworthy Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making

Min Hun Lee, Silvana Xin Yi Choo, Shamala D/O Thilarajah

With advanced AI/ML, there has been growing research on explainable AI (XAI) and studies on how humans interact with AI and XAI for effective human-AI collaborative decision-making. However, we still have a lack of understanding of how AI systems and XAI should be first presented to users without technical backgrounds. In this paper, we present the findings of semi-structured interviews with health professionals (n=12) and students (n=4) majoring in medicine and health to study how to improve onboarding with AI and XAI. For the interviews, we built upon human-AI interaction guidelines to create onboarding materials of an AI system for stroke rehabilitation assessment and AI explanations and introduce them to the participants. Our findings reveal that beyond presenting traditional performance metrics on AI, participants desired benchmark information, the practical benefits of AI, and interaction trials to better contextualize AI performance, and refine the objectives and performance of AI. Based on these findings, we highlight directions for improving onboarding with AI and XAI and human-AI collaborative decision-making.

Read more

5/28/2024