Exploiting ChatGPT for Diagnosing Autism-Associated Language Disorders and Identifying Distinct Features

Read original: arXiv:2405.01799 - Published 5/6/2024 by Chuanbo Hu, Wenqi Li, Mindi Ruan, Xiangxu Yu, Lynn K. Paul, Shuo Wang, Xin Li
Total Score

0

Exploiting ChatGPT for Diagnosing Autism-Associated Language Disorders and Identifying Distinct Features

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the potential of using the language model ChatGPT to diagnose autism-associated language disorders and identify distinct features of these disorders.
  • The researchers investigate how well ChatGPT can recognize and characterize differences in the language patterns of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to neurotypical individuals.
  • The findings have important implications for developing more accurate and accessible tools for the early detection and diagnosis of autism-related communication challenges.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this study wanted to see if the AI language model ChatGPT could be used to help identify and understand the unique language patterns associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Individuals with ASD often have differences in how they communicate and use language compared to people without ASD.

By using ChatGPT, the researchers aimed to develop a tool that could potentially assist in the diagnosis of ASD-related language disorders. This is important because early and accurate diagnosis of communication challenges can lead to earlier interventions and support for individuals with ASD.

The researchers had ChatGPT analyze language samples from both people with ASD and neurotypical (non-ASD) individuals. They wanted to see if ChatGPT could reliably detect the distinctive linguistic features that are often present in the language of people with ASD. If successful, this could provide a new, more accessible way to screen for and identify ASD-related communication differences.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a series of experiments to test ChatGPT's ability to recognize and characterize language differences between individuals with ASD and neurotypical controls. They used a dataset of language samples from both groups and had ChatGPT analyze the linguistic features and patterns in the samples.

The key steps in the researchers' approach were:

  1. Data collection: The researchers compiled a dataset of language samples from individuals with ASD and neurotypical controls, matched for age and other relevant factors.
  2. ChatGPT analysis: They prompted ChatGPT to analyze the language samples and identify any distinctive linguistic features or patterns that differentiated the ASD and neurotypical groups.
  3. Feature extraction and classification: The researchers used the insights from ChatGPT to extract specific linguistic features (e.g., lexical diversity, syntax complexity) that could be used to classify the language samples into ASD and neurotypical categories.
  4. Model evaluation: The researchers assessed the accuracy and reliability of using the extracted linguistic features to correctly classify the language samples as belonging to individuals with ASD or neurotypical controls.

The results of the study suggest that ChatGPT was able to successfully identify several key linguistic features that distinguished the language of individuals with ASD from neurotypical individuals. These included differences in vocabulary diversity, sentence structure, and the use of certain types of words and phrases.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their study. For example, the dataset used was relatively small, and the language samples were primarily in English, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Additionally, the researchers note that while ChatGPT was able to identify distinctive linguistic features, more research is needed to determine the reliability and clinical utility of using these features for the actual diagnosis of ASD-related language disorders. Factors such as individual variability, the influence of age and language proficiency, and the need for human expert validation must be further explored.

It would also be valuable to investigate how the performance of ChatGPT compares to other language models or diagnostic tools in this context, as well as to explore the potential biases or limitations of using a large language model like ChatGPT for this purpose.

Conclusion

This study provides promising evidence that language models like ChatGPT can be leveraged to help identify and characterize the unique linguistic features associated with autism spectrum disorder. By automating the analysis of language patterns, this approach has the potential to develop more accessible and scalable tools for the early detection and diagnosis of ASD-related communication challenges.

However, further research is needed to refine and validate the use of these techniques in clinical settings. Continued exploration of the capabilities and limitations of language models in this domain will be crucial for ensuring that any such tools are reliable, unbiased, and ultimately beneficial for individuals with autism and their families.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploiting ChatGPT for Diagnosing Autism-Associated Language Disorders and Identifying Distinct Features
Total Score

0

Exploiting ChatGPT for Diagnosing Autism-Associated Language Disorders and Identifying Distinct Features

Chuanbo Hu, Wenqi Li, Mindi Ruan, Xiangxu Yu, Lynn K. Paul, Shuo Wang, Xin Li

Diagnosing language disorders associated with autism is a complex and nuanced challenge, often hindered by the subjective nature and variability of traditional assessment methods. Traditional diagnostic methods not only require intensive human effort but also often result in delayed interventions due to their lack of speed and specificity. In this study, we explored the application of ChatGPT, a state of the art large language model, to overcome these obstacles by enhancing diagnostic accuracy and profiling specific linguistic features indicative of autism. Leveraging ChatGPT advanced natural language processing capabilities, this research aims to streamline and refine the diagnostic process. Specifically, we compared ChatGPT's performance with that of conventional supervised learning models, including BERT, a model acclaimed for its effectiveness in various natural language processing tasks. We showed that ChatGPT substantially outperformed these models, achieving over 13% improvement in both accuracy and F1 score in a zero shot learning configuration. This marked enhancement highlights the model potential as a superior tool for neurological diagnostics. Additionally, we identified ten distinct features of autism associated language disorders that vary significantly across different experimental scenarios. These features, which included echolalia, pronoun reversal, and atypical language usage, were crucial for accurately diagnosing ASD and customizing treatment plans. Together, our findings advocate for adopting sophisticated AI tools like ChatGPT in clinical settings to assess and diagnose developmental disorders. Our approach not only promises greater diagnostic precision but also aligns with the goals of personalized medicine, potentially transforming the evaluation landscape for autism and similar neurological conditions.

Read more

5/6/2024

Exploring the Capability of ChatGPT to Reproduce Human Labels for Social Computing Tasks (Extended Version)
Total Score

0

Exploring the Capability of ChatGPT to Reproduce Human Labels for Social Computing Tasks (Extended Version)

Yiming Zhu, Peixian Zhang, Ehsan-Ul Haq, Pan Hui, Gareth Tyson

Harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT can help address social challenges through inclusive, ethical, and sustainable means. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which ChatGPT can annotate data for social computing tasks, aiming to reduce the complexity and cost of undertaking web research. To evaluate ChatGPT's potential, we re-annotate seven datasets using ChatGPT, covering topics related to pressing social issues like COVID-19 misinformation, social bot deception, cyberbully, clickbait news, and the Russo-Ukrainian War. Our findings demonstrate that ChatGPT exhibits promise in handling these data annotation tasks, albeit with some challenges. Across the seven datasets, ChatGPT achieves an average annotation F1-score of 72.00%. Its performance excels in clickbait news annotation, correctly labeling 89.66% of the data. However, we also observe significant variations in performance across individual labels. Our study reveals predictable patterns in ChatGPT's annotation performance. Thus, we propose GPT-Rater, a tool to predict if ChatGPT can correctly label data for a given annotation task. Researchers can use this to identify where ChatGPT might be suitable for their annotation requirements. We show that GPT-Rater effectively predicts ChatGPT's performance. It performs best on a clickbait headlines dataset by achieving an average F1-score of 95.00%. We believe that this research opens new avenues for analysis and can reduce barriers to engaging in social computing research.

Read more

7/10/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Investigation of the effectiveness of applying ChatGPT in Dialogic Teaching Using Electroencephalography

Jiayue Zhang, Yiheng Liu, Wenqi Cai, Lanlan Wu, Yali Peng, Jingjing Yu, Senqing Qi, Taotao Long, Bao Ge

In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, especially the emergence of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, has presented significant prospects for application in the field of education. LLMs possess the capability to interpret knowledge, answer questions, and consider context, thus providing support for dialogic teaching to students. Therefore, an examination of the capacity of LLMs to effectively fulfill instructional roles, thereby facilitating student learning akin to human educators within dialogic teaching scenarios, is an exceptionally valuable research topic. This research recruited 34 undergraduate students as participants, who were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group engaged in dialogic teaching using ChatGPT, while the control group interacted with human teachers. Both groups learned the histogram equalization unit in the information-related course Digital Image Processing. The research findings show comparable scores between the two groups on the retention test. However, students who engaged in dialogue with ChatGPT exhibited lower performance on the transfer test. Electroencephalography data revealed that students who interacted with ChatGPT exhibited higher levels of cognitive activity, suggesting that ChatGPT could help students establish a knowledge foundation and stimulate cognitive activity. However, its strengths on promoting students. knowledge application and creativity were insignificant. Based upon the research findings, it is evident that ChatGPT cannot fully excel in fulfilling teaching tasks in the dialogue teaching in information related courses. Combining ChatGPT with traditional human teachers might be a more ideal approach. The synergistic use of both can provide students with more comprehensive learning support, thus contributing to enhancing the quality of teaching.

Read more

6/12/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Unmasking the giant: A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's proficiency in coding algorithms and data structures

Sayed Erfan Arefin, Tasnia Ashrafi Heya, Hasan Al-Qudah, Ynes Ineza, Abdul Serwadda

The transformative influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is profoundly reshaping the Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology domain. Notably, ChatGPT distinguishes itself within these models, demonstrating remarkable performance in multi-turn conversations and exhibiting code proficiency across an array of languages. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's coding capabilities based on what is to date the largest catalog of coding challenges. Our focus is on the python programming language and problems centered on data structures and algorithms, two topics at the very foundations of Computer Science. We evaluate ChatGPT for its ability to generate correct solutions to the problems fed to it, its code quality, and nature of run-time errors thrown by its code. Where ChatGPT code successfully executes, but fails to solve the problem at hand, we look into patterns in the test cases passed in order to gain some insights into how wrong ChatGPT code is in these kinds of situations. To infer whether ChatGPT might have directly memorized some of the data that was used to train it, we methodically design an experiment to investigate this phenomena. Making comparisons with human performance whenever feasible, we investigate all the above questions from the context of both its underlying learning models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), on a vast array sub-topics within the main topics, and on problems having varying degrees of difficulty.

Read more

5/28/2024