Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability

Read original: arXiv:2408.08448 - Published 9/12/2024 by Haniyeh Ehsani Oskouie, Lionel Levine, Majid Sarrafzadeh
Total Score

0

Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the relationship between cross-model neuronal correlations and the performance and generalizability of deep learning models.
  • It investigates whether analyzing the similarity of neuronal representations across models can provide insights into their performance and ability to generalize.
  • The researchers aim to understand how the structure of model representations relates to model behavior and real-world applicability.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the connections between the inner workings of different machine learning models and how well those models perform and generalize to new data. The researchers want to see if they can learn something about a model's behavior and how useful it will be in the real world by examining the similarity of the patterns of neuron activity inside the model compared to other models.

The idea is that if two models have very similar patterns of activity in their "neurons" (the mathematical components that make up the model), then those models may behave in similar ways and have similar strengths and weaknesses. By understanding these cross-model neuronal correlations, the researchers hope to be able to better predict how a model will perform and how well it will work outside of the specific data it was trained on.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the relationship between cross-model neuronal correlations and model performance and generalizability. The researchers hypothesize that analyzing the similarity of neuronal representations across models can provide insights into their behavior and real-world applicability.

They conduct experiments using a variety of computer vision and natural language processing models. First, they measure the pairwise correlations between the internal representations (activations of hidden neurons) of different models on the same input data. They then examine how these cross-model correlations relate to the models' performance on benchmark tasks as well as their ability to generalize to out-of-distribution data.

The results show that higher cross-model neuronal correlations are associated with better in-distribution performance but poorer out-of-distribution generalization. The researchers propose that this is because highly correlated models may be learning similar types of features and patterns, which can lead to overfitting on the training data. In contrast, models with more diverse internal representations may be able to better capture the complexity of the real world and generalize more effectively.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides an interesting perspective on understanding deep learning models by examining the relationships between their internal representations. However, there are a few important caveats to consider:

  • The study is primarily correlational, so it cannot establish definitive causal links between cross-model correlations and model performance. Additional experiments would be needed to tease apart these relationships.

  • The researchers focus on a limited set of computer vision and NLP models. It's unclear how well these findings would generalize to other domains or model architectures.

  • The paper does not delve into the specific mechanisms by which cross-model correlations might impact generalization. More work is needed to unpack the underlying reasons for this relationship.

  • The notion of "overfitting" due to highly correlated representations is intuitively plausible but would benefit from further theoretical and empirical exploration.

Overall, this research is a valuable step towards better understanding the complex relationships between model structure, behavior, and real-world applicability. However, more work is needed to fully validate and extend these insights.

Conclusion

This paper explores the connections between the internal representations of different machine learning models and how well those models perform and generalize. The key finding is that higher cross-model neuronal correlations are associated with better in-distribution performance but poorer out-of-distribution generalization.

This suggests that analyzing the similarity of models' internal "neuron" activity patterns could provide useful insights into their behavior and real-world applicability. While more research is needed to fully understand these relationships, this work represents an important step towards developing more transparent and generalizable AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability
Total Score

0

Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability

Haniyeh Ehsani Oskouie, Lionel Levine, Majid Sarrafzadeh

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are increasingly integrated into critical systems, the need for a robust framework to establish the trustworthiness of AI is increasingly paramount. While collaborative efforts have established conceptual foundations for such a framework, there remains a significant gap in developing concrete, technically robust methods for assessing AI model quality and performance. A critical drawback in the traditional methods for assessing the validity and generalizability of models is their dependence on internal developer datasets, rendering it challenging to independently assess and verify their performance claims. This paper introduces a novel approach for assessing a newly trained model's performance based on another known model by calculating correlation between neural networks. The proposed method evaluates correlations by determining if, for each neuron in one network, there exists a neuron in the other network that produces similar output. This approach has implications for memory efficiency, allowing for the use of smaller networks when high correlation exists between networks of different sizes. Additionally, the method provides insights into robustness, suggesting that if two highly correlated networks are compared and one demonstrates robustness when operating in production environments, the other is likely to exhibit similar robustness. This contribution advances the technical toolkit for responsible AI, supporting more comprehensive and nuanced evaluations of AI models to ensure their safe and effective deployment. Code is available at https://github.com/aheldis/Cross-model-correlation.git.

Read more

9/12/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Reassessing the Validity of Spurious Correlations Benchmarks

Samuel J. Bell, Diane Bouchacourt, Levent Sagun

Neural networks can fail when the data contains spurious correlations. To understand this phenomenon, researchers have proposed numerous spurious correlations benchmarks upon which to evaluate mitigation methods. However, we observe that these benchmarks exhibit substantial disagreement, with the best methods on one benchmark performing poorly on another. We explore this disagreement, and examine benchmark validity by defining three desiderata that a benchmark should satisfy in order to meaningfully evaluate methods. Our results have implications for both benchmarks and mitigations: we find that certain benchmarks are not meaningful measures of method performance, and that several methods are not sufficiently robust for widespread use. We present a simple recipe for practitioners to choose methods using the most similar benchmark to their given problem.

Read more

9/9/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Principles from Clinical Research for NLP Model Generalization

Aparna Elangovan, Jiayuan He, Yuan Li, Karin Verspoor

The NLP community typically relies on performance of a model on a held-out test set to assess generalization. Performance drops observed in datasets outside of official test sets are generally attributed to out-of-distribution effects. Here, we explore the foundations of generalizability and study the factors that affect it, articulating lessons from clinical studies. In clinical research, generalizability is an act of reasoning that depends on (a) internal validity of experiments to ensure controlled measurement of cause and effect, and (b) external validity or transportability of the results to the wider population. We demonstrate how learning spurious correlations, such as the distance between entities in relation extraction tasks, can affect a model's internal validity and in turn adversely impact generalization. We, therefore, present the need to ensure internal validity when building machine learning models in NLP. Our recommendations also apply to generative large language models, as they are known to be sensitive to even minor semantic preserving alterations. We also propose adapting the idea of matching in randomized controlled trials and observational studies to NLP evaluation to measure causation.

Read more

4/3/2024

Harmony in Diversity: Merging Neural Networks with Canonical Correlation Analysis
Total Score

0

Harmony in Diversity: Merging Neural Networks with Canonical Correlation Analysis

Stefan Horoi, Albert Manuel Orozco Camacho, Eugene Belilovsky, Guy Wolf

Combining the predictions of multiple trained models through ensembling is generally a good way to improve accuracy by leveraging the different learned features of the models, however it comes with high computational and storage costs. Model fusion, the act of merging multiple models into one by combining their parameters reduces these costs but doesn't work as well in practice. Indeed, neural network loss landscapes are high-dimensional and non-convex and the minima found through learning are typically separated by high loss barriers. Numerous recent works have been focused on finding permutations matching one network features to the features of a second one, lowering the loss barrier on the linear path between them in parameter space. However, permutations are restrictive since they assume a one-to-one mapping between the different models' neurons exists. We propose a new model merging algorithm, CCA Merge, which is based on Canonical Correlation Analysis and aims to maximize the correlations between linear combinations of the model features. We show that our alignment method leads to better performances than past methods when averaging models trained on the same, or differing data splits. We also extend this analysis into the harder setting where more than 2 models are merged, and we find that CCA Merge works significantly better than past methods. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/shoroi/align-n-merge

Read more

7/9/2024