Exploring How Multiple Levels of GPT-Generated Programming Hints Support or Disappoint Novices

Read original: arXiv:2404.02213 - Published 4/4/2024 by Ruiwei Xiao, Xinying Hou, John Stamper
Total Score

0

Exploring How Multiple Levels of GPT-Generated Programming Hints Support or Disappoint Novices

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines how different levels of programming hints generated by large language models (GPT) can either support or disappoint novice programmers.
  • The researchers tested various programming hint formats to understand which ones were most helpful for beginners learning to code.
  • The findings provide insights into how AI-generated assistance can be designed to best support novice programmers.

Plain English Explanation

Learning to code can be challenging, especially for beginners. This research looks at how AI language models like GPT can be used to provide programming hints and guidance to help novice coders.

The researchers created different versions of programming hints - some very detailed, some more concise - and had beginner programmers try them out. They wanted to see which types of hints were most useful and which ones fell short of expectations.

The key idea is that AI systems have the potential to provide personalized, on-demand coding assistance. But the researchers found that the format and level of detail in the hints really mattered. Overly complex or generic hints were not as helpful as targeted, step-by-step guidance.

By understanding what makes AI-generated programming support effective, the researchers hope to inform the design of better AI tutoring and assistance tools for novice coders. The goal is to use the power of large language models to scaffold the learning process and enable more people to pick up valuable programming skills.

Technical Explanation

The paper conducts a user study to explore the use of GPT-generated programming hints to support novice programmers. The researchers created three levels of programming hints:

  1. High-Level Hints: These provided a broad, conceptual overview of the programming problem and potential approaches.
  2. Medium-Level Hints: These gave more specific, step-by-step guidance on how to implement the solution.
  3. Low-Level Hints: These provided detailed, line-by-line code snippets to complete the task.

Beginner programmers were randomly assigned to receive one of these three hint types while working on introductory coding exercises. The researchers collected quantitative data on the participants' performance, as well as qualitative feedback on their experiences and perceptions of the different hint formats.

The results showed that the medium-level hints were most effective, leading to better task completion rates and more positive user feedback compared to the high-level or low-level hints. Participants felt the medium hints struck the right balance of guidance without being overly prescriptive.

The authors argue these findings demonstrate the importance of optimizing the format and granularity of AI-generated programming assistance to match the needs of novice learners. Blindly providing very detailed or very broad hints may not be as helpful as a tailored, scaffolded approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of how to design effective AI-based programming support for beginners. The user study methodology is sound, and the results offer clear, actionable insights.

However, the research is limited to a specific set of coding exercises and does not address how these findings might apply to more advanced programming tasks or different learning contexts. The authors acknowledge this as an area for future work.

Additionally, while the paper highlights the benefits of medium-level hints, it does not delve into the potential drawbacks of overly detailed, low-level hints. There may be risks of these hints discouraging independent problem-solving or masking fundamental gaps in understanding.

Further research could investigate how to dynamically adjust the hint level based on a learner's progress and needs. Exploring the integration of these AI-generated hints with other educational scaffolding techniques could also yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution to understanding how AI language models like GPT can be leveraged to support novice programmers. The key finding - that medium-level, step-by-step hints tend to be more effective than high-level overviews or low-level code snippets - provides a useful guideline for designing AI-assisted learning systems.

By optimizing the format and granularity of programming support, the research suggests AI can play a valuable role in making coding education more accessible and effective. As large language models continue to advance, this work highlights the potential to harness their power to scaffold the learning process and empower more people to develop vital programming skills.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring How Multiple Levels of GPT-Generated Programming Hints Support or Disappoint Novices
Total Score

0

Exploring How Multiple Levels of GPT-Generated Programming Hints Support or Disappoint Novices

Ruiwei Xiao, Xinying Hou, John Stamper

Recent studies have integrated large language models (LLMs) into diverse educational contexts, including providing adaptive programming hints, a type of feedback focuses on helping students move forward during problem-solving. However, most existing LLM-based hint systems are limited to one single hint type. To investigate whether and how different levels of hints can support students' problem-solving and learning, we conducted a think-aloud study with 12 novices using the LLM Hint Factory, a system providing four levels of hints from general natural language guidance to concrete code assistance, varying in format and granularity. We discovered that high-level natural language hints alone can be helpless or even misleading, especially when addressing next-step or syntax-related help requests. Adding lower-level hints, like code examples with in-line comments, can better support students. The findings open up future work on customizing help responses from content, format, and granularity levels to accurately identify and meet students' learning needs.

Read more

4/4/2024

Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validation
Total Score

0

Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validation

Tung Phung, Victor-Alexandru Pu{a}durean, Anjali Singh, Christopher Brooks, Jos'e Cambronero, Sumit Gulwani, Adish Singla, Gustavo Soares

Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating individualized feedback for students. We investigate the role of generative AI models in providing human tutor-style programming hints to help students resolve errors in their buggy programs. Recent works have benchmarked state-of-the-art models for various feedback generation scenarios; however, their overall quality is still inferior to human tutors and not yet ready for real-world deployment. In this paper, we seek to push the limits of generative AI models toward providing high-quality programming hints and develop a novel technique, GPT4Hints-GPT3.5Val. As a first step, our technique leverages GPT-4 as a ``tutor'' model to generate hints -- it boosts the generative quality by using symbolic information of failing test cases and fixes in prompts. As a next step, our technique leverages GPT-3.5, a weaker model, as a ``student'' model to further validate the hint quality -- it performs an automatic quality validation by simulating the potential utility of providing this feedback. We show the efficacy of our technique via extensive evaluation using three real-world datasets of Python programs covering a variety of concepts ranging from basic algorithms to regular expressions and data analysis using pandas library.

Read more

8/7/2024

A Knowledge-Component-Based Methodology for Evaluating AI Assistants
Total Score

0

A Knowledge-Component-Based Methodology for Evaluating AI Assistants

Laryn Qi, J. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Taehan Kim, Bjorn Hartmann, John DeNero, Narges Norouzi

We evaluate an automatic hint generator for CS1 programming assignments powered by GPT-4, a large language model. This system provides natural language guidance about how students can improve their incorrect solutions to short programming exercises. A hint can be requested each time a student fails a test case. Our evaluation addresses three Research Questions: RQ1: Do the hints help students improve their code? RQ2: How effectively do the hints capture problems in student code? RQ3: Are the issues that students resolve the same as the issues addressed in the hints? To address these research questions quantitatively, we identified a set of fine-grained knowledge components and determined which ones apply to each exercise, incorrect solution, and generated hint. Comparing data from two large CS1 offerings, we found that access to the hints helps students to address problems with their code more quickly, that hints are able to consistently capture the most pressing errors in students' code, and that hints that address a few issues at once rather than a single bug are more likely to lead to direct student progress.

Read more

6/11/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Feedback-Generation for Programming Exercises With GPT-4

Imen Azaiz, Natalie Kiesler, Sven Strickroth

Ever since Large Language Models (LLMs) and related applications have become broadly available, several studies investigated their potential for assisting educators and supporting students in higher education. LLMs such as Codex, GPT-3.5, and GPT 4 have shown promising results in the context of large programming courses, where students can benefit from feedback and hints if provided timely and at scale. This paper explores the quality of GPT-4 Turbo's generated output for prompts containing both the programming task specification and a student's submission as input. Two assignments from an introductory programming course were selected, and GPT-4 was asked to generate feedback for 55 randomly chosen, authentic student programming submissions. The output was qualitatively analyzed regarding correctness, personalization, fault localization, and other features identified in the material. Compared to prior work and analyses of GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Turbo shows notable improvements. For example, the output is more structured and consistent. GPT-4 Turbo can also accurately identify invalid casing in student programs' output. In some cases, the feedback also includes the output of the student program. At the same time, inconsistent feedback was noted such as stating that the submission is correct but an error needs to be fixed. The present work increases our understanding of LLMs' potential, limitations, and how to integrate them into e-assessment systems, pedagogical scenarios, and instructing students who are using applications based on GPT-4.

Read more

7/8/2024