Exploring Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation by Synergizing Active Learning and Model Selection

Read original: arXiv:2405.18911 - Published 8/28/2024 by Yushu Li, Yongyi Su, Xulei Yang, Kui Jia, Xun Xu
Total Score

0

Exploring Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation by Synergizing Active Learning and Model Selection

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a novel approach to test-time adaptation that combines active learning and model selection to improve model performance on unseen data.
  • The proposed method, called "Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation," involves human interaction to selectively adapt the model to specific test instances, leveraging the synergies between active learning and model selection.
  • The authors conduct extensive experiments to validate their approach and provide theoretical analyses to understand the benefits of their framework.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to improve the performance of machine learning models when they are used in the real world, on data that the model has not been trained on before. This is called "test-time adaptation," and it's an important problem because models don't always work perfectly on new, unseen data.

The key idea in this paper is to combine two different techniques: active learning and model selection. Active learning is a way to get humans to help the model learn by having them label some of the new data. Model selection is the process of choosing the best model from a set of different models.

By using both of these techniques together, the researchers found they could significantly improve the model's performance on the new, unseen data. The human input helps the model adapt to the specific characteristics of the new data, while the model selection finds the right model to use for that particular situation.

The researchers conducted detailed experiments to test their approach and also provided theoretical analysis to explain why it works so well. They showed that their "Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation" method outperforms other state-of-the-art techniques for adapting models to new data.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel framework called "Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation" that combines active learning and model selection to improve model performance on unseen test data.

The key idea is to leverage human input to selectively adapt the model to specific test instances. The framework first uses active learning to query a human expert for labels on a small subset of the test data. It then uses these labeled instances to perform model selection, choosing the model that performs best on the labeled test data.

The authors conduct extensive experiments on various datasets and tasks, including image classification, text classification, and recommendation systems. They show that their approach significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art test-time adaptation methods, such as entropy-based adaptation and test-time training.

The paper also provides theoretical analyses to understand the benefits of their framework. They show that the combination of active learning and model selection leads to better adaptation performance compared to using either technique alone.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation of the proposed "Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation" framework. The authors have considered various datasets and tasks, providing a comprehensive evaluation of their approach.

One potential limitation of the method is the reliance on human input, which may not always be feasible or scalable, especially for large-scale deployment. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring ways to reduce the human effort required, such as active learning with a smaller number of queries or leveraging unlabeled data.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational overhead of the proposed framework, which may be a concern in real-world applications with tight time constraints. Further research could explore ways to optimize the computational efficiency of the approach.

Overall, the paper presents a novel and promising approach to test-time adaptation, and the authors have provided a solid foundation for future research in this direction.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a innovative "Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation" framework that combines active learning and model selection to improve model performance on unseen data. By leveraging human input to selectively adapt the model, the approach demonstrates significant advantages over other state-of-the-art test-time adaptation methods.

The paper's detailed experiments and theoretical analyses provide valuable insights into the benefits of this synergistic approach. While the reliance on human input and computational efficiency may be areas for further exploration, the proposed framework represents an important step forward in enhancing the real-world applicability of machine learning models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation by Synergizing Active Learning and Model Selection
Total Score

0

Exploring Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation by Synergizing Active Learning and Model Selection

Yushu Li, Yongyi Su, Xulei Yang, Kui Jia, Xun Xu

Existing test-time adaptation (TTA) approaches often adapt models with the unlabeled testing data stream. A recent attempt relaxed the assumption by introducing limited human annotation, referred to as Human-In-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation (HILTTA) in this study. The focus of existing HILTTA studies lies in selecting the most informative samples to label, a.k.a. active learning. In this work, we are motivated by a pitfall of TTA, i.e. sensitivity to hyper-parameters, and propose to approach HILTTA by synergizing active learning and model selection. Specifically, we first select samples for human annotation (active learning) and then use the labeled data to select optimal hyper-parameters (model selection). To prevent the model selection process from overfitting to local distributions, multiple regularization techniques are employed to complement the validation objective. A sample selection strategy is further tailored by considering the balance between active learning and model selection purposes. We demonstrate on 5 TTA datasets that the proposed HILTTA approach is compatible with off-the-shelf TTA methods and such combinations substantially outperform the state-of-the-art HILTTA methods. Importantly, our proposed method can always prevent choosing the worst hyper-parameters on all off-the-shelf TTA methods. The source code will be released upon publication.

Read more

8/28/2024

Realistic Evaluation of Test-Time Adaptation Algorithms: Unsupervised Hyperparameter Selection
Total Score

0

Realistic Evaluation of Test-Time Adaptation Algorithms: Unsupervised Hyperparameter Selection

Sebastian Cygert, Damian S'ojka, Tomasz Trzci'nski, Bart{l}omiej Twardowski

Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has recently emerged as a promising strategy for tackling the problem of machine learning model robustness under distribution shifts by adapting the model during inference without access to any labels. Because of task difficulty, hyperparameters strongly influence the effectiveness of adaptation. However, the literature has provided little exploration into optimal hyperparameter selection. In this work, we tackle this problem by evaluating existing TTA methods using surrogate-based hp-selection strategies (which do not assume access to the test labels) to obtain a more realistic evaluation of their performance. We show that some of the recent state-of-the-art methods exhibit inferior performance compared to the previous algorithms when using our more realistic evaluation setup. Further, we show that forgetting is still a problem in TTA as the only method that is robust to hp-selection resets the model to the initial state at every step. We analyze different types of unsupervised selection strategies, and while they work reasonably well in most scenarios, the only strategies that work consistently well use some kind of supervision (either by a limited number of annotated test samples or by using pretraining data). Our findings underscore the need for further research with more rigorous benchmarking by explicitly stating model selection strategies, to facilitate which we open-source our code.

Read more

7/22/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Towards Clinician-Preferred Segmentation: Leveraging Human-in-the-Loop for Test Time Adaptation in Medical Image Segmentation

Shishuai Hu, Zehui Liao, Zeyou Liu, Yong Xia

Deep learning-based medical image segmentation models often face performance degradation when deployed across various medical centers, largely due to the discrepancies in data distribution. Test Time Adaptation (TTA) methods, which adapt pre-trained models to test data, have been employed to mitigate such discrepancies. However, existing TTA methods primarily focus on manipulating Batch Normalization (BN) layers or employing prompt and adversarial learning, which may not effectively rectify the inconsistencies arising from divergent data distributions. In this paper, we propose a novel Human-in-the-loop TTA (HiTTA) framework that stands out in two significant ways. First, it capitalizes on the largely overlooked potential of clinician-corrected predictions, integrating these corrections into the TTA process to steer the model towards predictions that coincide more closely with clinical annotation preferences. Second, our framework conceives a divergence loss, designed specifically to diminish the prediction divergence instigated by domain disparities, through the careful calibration of BN parameters. Our HiTTA is distinguished by its dual-faceted capability to acclimatize to the distribution of test data whilst ensuring the model's predictions align with clinical expectations, thereby enhancing its relevance in a medical context. Extensive experiments on a public dataset underscore the superiority of our HiTTA over existing TTA methods, emphasizing the advantages of integrating human feedback and our divergence loss in enhancing the model's performance and adaptability across diverse medical centers.

Read more

5/15/2024

Active Test-Time Adaptation: Theoretical Analyses and An Algorithm
Total Score

0

Active Test-Time Adaptation: Theoretical Analyses and An Algorithm

Shurui Gui, Xiner Li, Shuiwang Ji

Test-time adaptation (TTA) addresses distribution shifts for streaming test data in unsupervised settings. Currently, most TTA methods can only deal with minor shifts and rely heavily on heuristic and empirical studies. To advance TTA under domain shifts, we propose the novel problem setting of active test-time adaptation (ATTA) that integrates active learning within the fully TTA setting. We provide a learning theory analysis, demonstrating that incorporating limited labeled test instances enhances overall performances across test domains with a theoretical guarantee. We also present a sample entropy balancing for implementing ATTA while avoiding catastrophic forgetting (CF). We introduce a simple yet effective ATTA algorithm, known as SimATTA, using real-time sample selection techniques. Extensive experimental results confirm consistency with our theoretical analyses and show that the proposed ATTA method yields substantial performance improvements over TTA methods while maintaining efficiency and shares similar effectiveness to the more demanding active domain adaptation (ADA) methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/divelab/ATTA

Read more

4/9/2024