Exploring and Learning Structure: Active Inference Approach in Navigational Agents

Read original: arXiv:2408.05982 - Published 9/4/2024 by Daria de Tinguy, Tim Verbelen, Bart Dhoedt
Total Score

0

Exploring and Learning Structure: Active Inference Approach in Navigational Agents

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores how navigational agents can actively learn the structure of their environment using the active inference framework.
  • Active inference is a theory of decision-making that frames an agent's behavior as minimizing the uncertainty about its environment.
  • The researchers develop a hierarchical active inference agent that can simultaneously learn a map of the environment and plan optimal navigation paths.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how intelligent agents, like robots or virtual assistants, can explore and learn about the structure of their surroundings. It uses an approach called "active inference" to help the agents figure out their environment.

Active inference is a way of thinking about how agents make decisions. The idea is that agents try to minimize the uncertainty about their world - they take actions that help them better understand their environment.

In this paper, the researchers create a hierarchical active inference agent that can do two key things at the same time:

  1. Learn a map of the environment: The agent builds up a mental model of the layout and features of the space it's in.

  2. Plan optimal navigation paths: Using the map it creates, the agent can figure out the best routes to get where it needs to go.

By combining these two capabilities, the agent can actively explore its surroundings, learn about the structure, and then use that knowledge to move around efficiently. The researchers show that this approach allows the agent to quickly adapt to new or changing environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a hierarchical active inference agent for simultaneous mapping and planning in navigational tasks. Active inference is a framework that models an agent's behavior as minimizing uncertainty about its environment.

The proposed agent has a two-level hierarchical structure. At the higher level, it learns a generative model of the environment, representing the spatial layout and landmark features. At the lower level, it plans optimal navigation paths based on this learned model.

The agent's learning and planning are tightly coupled - as it explores the environment, it updates its internal map, which in turn allows it to plan better routes. This active learning process helps the agent quickly build an accurate representation of the structure of its surroundings.

The researchers evaluate the agent's performance in both simulated and real-world navigation tasks. They find that the hierarchical active inference approach allows the agent to rapidly learn the environment and plan efficient paths, outperforming baseline methods that do not integrate mapping and planning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how active inference can be used to enable intelligent navigation agents that can simultaneously learn about and act within their environments. The hierarchical structure and tight coupling between mapping and planning are notable strengths of the approach.

That said, the paper does not extensively discuss potential limitations or caveats. For example, it is unclear how the approach would scale to large or very complex environments, or how it would handle dynamic changes in the environment over time. Additionally, the reliance on a precise generative model of the environment may be a limitation in real-world scenarios with substantial sensory noise or uncertainty.

Further research could explore ways to make the active inference framework more robust and adaptive, potentially drawing inspiration from other approaches that integrate active inference with other techniques like model-free reinforcement learning. Investigating the agent's human-like navigation capabilities and affordance learning could also be fruitful avenues for future work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel hierarchical active inference agent that can simultaneously learn a spatial map of its environment and plan optimal navigation paths. By tightly coupling these mapping and planning processes, the agent is able to actively explore and build an accurate internal representation of its surroundings, allowing for efficient and adaptive navigation.

While the paper does not fully explore the approach's limitations, it demonstrates the potential of active inference to enable intelligent agents that can effectively learn about and navigate complex environments. Further research in this direction could yield valuable insights for the development of more capable and adaptable navigational systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring and Learning Structure: Active Inference Approach in Navigational Agents
Total Score

0

Exploring and Learning Structure: Active Inference Approach in Navigational Agents

Daria de Tinguy, Tim Verbelen, Bart Dhoedt

Drawing inspiration from animal navigation strategies, we introduce a novel computational model for navigation and mapping, rooted in biologically inspired principles. Animals exhibit remarkable navigation abilities by efficiently using memory, imagination, and strategic decision-making to navigate complex and aliased environments. Building on these insights, we integrate traditional cognitive mapping approaches with an Active Inference Framework (AIF) to learn an environment structure in a few steps. Through the incorporation of topological mapping for long-term memory and AIF for navigation planning and structure learning, our model can dynamically apprehend environmental structures and expand its internal map with predicted beliefs during exploration. Comparative experiments with the Clone-Structured Graph (CSCG) model highlight our model's ability to rapidly learn environmental structures in a single episode, with minimal navigation overlap. this is achieved without prior knowledge of the dimensions of the environment or the type of observations, showcasing its robustness and effectiveness in navigating ambiguous environments.

Read more

9/4/2024

Spatial and Temporal Hierarchy for Autonomous Navigation using Active Inference in Minigrid Environment
Total Score

0

Spatial and Temporal Hierarchy for Autonomous Navigation using Active Inference in Minigrid Environment

Daria de Tinguy, Toon van de Maele, Tim Verbelen, Bart Dhoedt

Robust evidence suggests that humans explore their environment using a combination of topological landmarks and coarse-grained path integration. This approach relies on identifiable environmental features (topological landmarks) in tandem with estimations of distance and direction (coarse-grained path integration) to construct cognitive maps of the surroundings. This cognitive map is believed to exhibit a hierarchical structure, allowing efficient planning when solving complex navigation tasks. Inspired by human behaviour, this paper presents a scalable hierarchical active inference model for autonomous navigation, exploration, and goal-oriented behaviour. The model uses visual observation and motion perception to combine curiosity-driven exploration with goal-oriented behaviour. Motion is planned using different levels of reasoning, i.e., from context to place to motion. This allows for efficient navigation in new spaces and rapid progress toward a target. By incorporating these human navigational strategies and their hierarchical representation of the environment, this model proposes a new solution for autonomous navigation and exploration. The approach is validated through simulations in a mini-grid environment.

Read more

9/16/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Dynamic planning in hierarchical active inference

Matteo Priorelli, Ivilin Peev Stoianov

By dynamic planning, we refer to the ability of the human brain to infer and impose motor trajectories related to cognitive decisions. A recent paradigm, active inference, brings fundamental insights into the adaptation of biological organisms, constantly striving to minimize prediction errors to restrict themselves to life-compatible states. Over the past years, many studies have shown how human and animal behavior could be explained in terms of an active inferential process - either as discrete decision-making or continuous motor control - inspiring innovative solutions in robotics and artificial intelligence. Still, the literature lacks a comprehensive outlook on how to effectively plan actions in changing environments. Setting ourselves the goal of modeling tool use, we delve into the topic of dynamic planning in active inference, keeping in mind two crucial aspects of biological goal-directed behavior: the capacity to understand and exploit affordances for object manipulation, and to learn the hierarchical interactions between the self and the environment, including other agents. We start from a simple unit and gradually describe more advanced structures, comparing recently proposed design choices and providing basic examples for each section. This study distances itself from traditional views centered on neural networks and reinforcement learning, and points toward a yet unexplored direction in active inference: hybrid representations in hierarchical models.

Read more

7/1/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Structured Active Inference (Extended Abstract)

Toby St Clere Smithe

We introduce structured active inference, a large generalization and formalization of active inference using the tools of categorical systems theory. We cast generative models formally as systems on an interface, with the latter being a compositional abstraction of the usual notion of Markov blanket; agents are then 'controllers' for their generative models, formally dual to them. This opens the active inference landscape to new horizons, such as: agents with structured interfaces (e.g. with 'mode-dependence', or that interact with computer APIs); agents that can manage other agents; and 'meta-agents', that use active inference to change their (internal or external) structure. With structured interfaces, we also gain structured ('typed') policies, which are amenable to formal verification, an important step towards safe artificial agents. Moreover, we can make use of categorical logic to describe express agents' goals as formal predicates, whose satisfaction may be dependent on the interaction context. This points towards powerful compositional tools to constrain and control self-organizing ensembles of agents.

Read more

6/13/2024