Exploring Parent-Child Perceptions on Safety in Generative AI: Concerns, Mitigation Strategies, and Design Implications
0
🔗
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores parent-child perceptions on safety in generative AI
- Identifies key concerns and mitigation strategies
- Discusses design implications for safe and trustworthy generative AI systems
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how parents and their children view the safety of generative AI systems, such as chatbots and content generators. It aims to understand the key concerns that families have about these technologies and the strategies they believe could address those issues.
The researchers conducted interviews with both parents and their children to get a well-rounded perspective. They found that common concerns include the risk of exposure to inappropriate content, the potential for biased or inaccurate outputs, and the challenge of monitoring and managing usage.
Families proposed a variety of mitigation strategies, such as improved content filtering, more transparency about AI capabilities and limitations, and collaborative approaches to ensuring safe and trustworthy interactions. The paper discusses how these perspectives can inform the design of future generative AI systems to better meet the needs and concerns of users, especially when children are involved.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 parent-child dyads to explore their perceptions on the safety of generative AI systems. They recruited families with children aged 8-14 and asked both parents and children about their experiences, concerns, and ideas for addressing safety issues.
The interviews covered topics like the types of generative AI apps/tools used, perceived risks and benefits, strategies for managing usage, and desired safety features. The researchers used thematic analysis to identify recurring themes in the responses.
Key findings include:
- Common concerns around inappropriate content, biased or unreliable outputs, and difficulty monitoring and controlling usage
- Proposed mitigation strategies like enhanced content filtering, clearer AI limitations, and collaborative family approaches
- Design implications for making generative AI systems more transparent, controllable, and aligned with user safety needs
The findings highlight the importance of considering diverse user perspectives, especially for technologies that may impact children, when developing safe and trustworthy AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into how families perceive the safety of generative AI and what they believe could help address their concerns. However, the study is limited by its relatively small sample size and focus on a specific age range of children.
Further research may be needed to understand the perspectives of families with younger or older children, as well as those from diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. The paper also does not delve deeply into the technical details of how generative AI systems work or the broader landscape of AI safety research.
Additionally, while the proposed mitigation strategies seem reasonable, their effectiveness and feasibility would need to be rigorously tested and validated. Implementing some of these ideas, such as enhanced content filtering or collaborative family approaches, may come with their own set of challenges and unintended consequences that warrant further exploration.
Conclusion
This study offers an important glimpse into the safety concerns that parents and children have around generative AI and the strategies they believe could help mitigate those issues. The findings suggest that addressing user needs, especially for vulnerable populations like children, should be a key priority in the development of safe and trustworthy AI systems.
By incorporating user perspectives into the design process, AI researchers and developers can work towards creating technologies that better align with the values and expectations of the communities they serve. This paper provides a solid foundation for future work in this area, which will be increasingly crucial as generative AI becomes more prevalent in our daily lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔗
0
Exploring Parent-Child Perceptions on Safety in Generative AI: Concerns, Mitigation Strategies, and Design Implications
Yaman Yu, Tanusree Sharma, Melinda Hu, Justin Wang, Yang Wang
The widespread use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) among teenagers has led to significant misuse and safety concerns. To identify risks and understand parental controls challenges, we conducted a content analysis on Reddit and interviewed 20 participants (seven teenagers and 13 parents). Our study reveals a significant gap in parental awareness of the extensive ways children use GAI, such as interacting with character-based chatbots for emotional support or engaging in virtual relationships. Parents and children report differing perceptions of risks associated with GAI. Parents primarily express concerns about data collection, misinformation, and exposure to inappropriate content. In contrast, teenagers are more concerned about becoming addicted to virtual relationships with GAI, the potential misuse of GAI to spread harmful content in social groups, and the invasion of privacy due to unauthorized use of their personal data in GAI applications. The absence of parental control features on GAI platforms forces parents to rely on system-built controls, manually check histories, share accounts, and engage in active mediation. Despite these efforts, parents struggle to grasp the full spectrum of GAI-related risks and to perform effective real-time monitoring, mediation, and education. We provide design recommendations to improve parent-child communication and enhance the safety of GAI use.
Read more6/18/2024
🤖
0
Children's Overtrust and Shifting Perspectives of Generative AI
Jaemarie Solyst, Ellia Yang, Shixian Xie, Jessica Hammer, Amy Ogan, Motahhare Eslami
The capabilities of generative AI (genAI) have dramatically increased in recent times, and there are opportunities for children to leverage new features for personal and school-related endeavors. However, while the future of genAI is taking form, there remain potentially harmful limitations, such as generation of outputs with misinformation and bias. We ran a workshop study focused on ChatGPT to explore middle school girls' (N = 26) attitudes and reasoning about how genAI works. We focused on girls who are often disproportionately impacted by algorithmic bias. We found that: (1) middle school girls were initially overtrusting of genAI, (2) deliberate exposure to the limitations and mistakes of generative AI shifted this overtrust to disillusionment about genAI capabilities, though they were still optimistic for future possibilities of genAI, and (3) their ideas about school policy were nuanced. This work informs how children think about genAI like ChatGPT and its integration in learning settings.
Read more7/2/2024
0
AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey
Jaymari Chua, Yun Li, Shiyi Yang, Chen Wang, Lina Yao
Large Language Model (LLMs) such as ChatGPT that exhibit generative AI capabilities are facing accelerated adoption and innovation. The increased presence of Generative AI (GAI) inevitably raises concerns about the risks and safety associated with these models. This article provides an up-to-date survey of recent trends in AI safety research of GAI-LLMs from a computer scientist's perspective: specific and technical. In this survey, we explore the background and motivation for the identified harms and risks in the context of LLMs being generative language models; our survey differentiates by emphasising the need for unified theories of the distinct safety challenges in the research development and applications of LLMs. We start our discussion with a concise introduction to the workings of LLMs, supported by relevant literature. Then we discuss earlier research that has pointed out the fundamental constraints of generative models, or lack of understanding thereof (e.g., performance and safety trade-offs as LLMs scale in number of parameters). We provide a sufficient coverage of LLM alignment -- delving into various approaches, contending methods and present challenges associated with aligning LLMs with human preferences. By highlighting the gaps in the literature and possible implementation oversights, our aim is to create a comprehensive analysis that provides insights for addressing AI safety in LLMs and encourages the development of aligned and secure models. We conclude our survey by discussing future directions of LLMs for AI safety, offering insights into ongoing research in this critical area.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Understanding Parents' Perceptions and Practices Toward Children's Security and Privacy in Virtual Reality
Jiaxun Cao, Abhinaya S. B., Anupam Das, Pardis Emami-Naeini
Recent years have seen a sharp increase in the number of underage users in virtual reality (VR), where security and privacy (S&P) risks such as data surveillance and self-disclosure in social interaction have been increasingly prominent. Prior work shows children largely rely on parents to mitigate S&P risks in their technology use. Therefore, understanding parents' S&P knowledge, perceptions, and practices is critical for identifying the gaps for parents, technology designers, and policymakers to enhance children's S&P. While such empirical knowledge is substantial in other consumer technologies, it remains largely unknown in the context of VR. To address the gap, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 parents of children under the age of 18 who use VR at home. Our findings highlight parents generally lack S&P awareness due to the perception that VR is still in its infancy. To protect their children's interactions with VR, parents currently primarily rely on active strategies such as verbal education about S&P. Passive strategies such as using parental controls in VR are not commonly used among our interviewees, mainly due to their perceived technical constraints. Parents also highlight that a multi-stakeholder ecosystem must be established towards more S&P support for children in VR. Based on the findings, we propose actionable S&P recommendations for critical stakeholders, including parents, educators, VR companies, and governments.
Read more5/7/2024