AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey

Read original: arXiv:2407.18369 - Published 7/29/2024 by Jaymari Chua, Yun Li, Shiyi Yang, Chen Wang, Lina Yao
Total Score

0

AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of AI safety challenges and mitigation strategies for large language models (LLMs).
  • Key topics covered include model biases, safety and robustness, transparency, oversight, and the implications of LLM capabilities on society.
  • The authors analyze the current state of the field and identify critical areas for future research.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines the important issue of AI safety in generative AI large language models. As these powerful language models become more advanced and widely used, there are growing concerns about potential risks and unintended consequences.

The authors review the current landscape of guidelines and best practices for ensuring the safety and responsible development of LLMs. They explore a range of challenges, such as model biases, safety and robustness, transparency, and oversight.

The paper also discusses the broader societal implications of these highly capable language models, and identifies crucial areas for future research and mitigation strategies to address the identified risks and challenges.

By evaluating the current state of the field and proposing solutions, the authors aim to help guide the development of safe and responsible LLMs that can be leveraged to benefit humanity.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by outlining the strategy for the literature search and the key areas of focus, which include model biases, safety and robustness, transparency, oversight, and the broader societal implications of LLMs.

The authors then review the current landscape of academic guidelines and best practices for ensuring the responsible development of LLMs, highlighting both the progress made and the remaining challenges.

Next, the paper delves into the technical details of the identified AI safety challenges, such as model biases, safety and robustness issues, transparency concerns, and the need for effective oversight and governance mechanisms.

The authors also examine the broader societal implications of LLMs, including their potential impact on employment, education, and democratic processes, as well as the ethical considerations surrounding their use.

Finally, the paper outlines key areas for future research and mitigation strategies to address the identified AI safety challenges and ensure the responsible development and deployment of LLMs.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the critical AI safety issues surrounding large language models. The authors have done an excellent job of synthesizing the current state of the field and identifying the key challenges.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it may not cover the most recent advancements and developments in the field, as the research landscape is rapidly evolving. Additionally, the proposed mitigation strategies may require further testing and validation to ensure their effectiveness in real-world applications.

Nonetheless, the paper serves as an invaluable resource for researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders working to develop safe and responsible large language models. By bringing attention to these critical issues and outlining potential solutions, the authors have made a significant contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure the responsible development and deployment of this transformative technology.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey paper provides a detailed examination of the AI safety challenges and mitigation strategies for large language models. By analyzing the current state of the field and identifying key research areas, the authors have laid the groundwork for future efforts to develop safe and responsible LLMs that can be leveraged to benefit society.

The insights and recommendations presented in this paper will be invaluable for researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders as they work to navigate the complex landscape of LLM development and deployment. Continued progress in this critical area will be essential for ensuring that the transformative potential of large language models is realized in a way that prioritizes safety, transparency, and ethical considerations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey
Total Score

0

AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey

Jaymari Chua, Yun Li, Shiyi Yang, Chen Wang, Lina Yao

Large Language Model (LLMs) such as ChatGPT that exhibit generative AI capabilities are facing accelerated adoption and innovation. The increased presence of Generative AI (GAI) inevitably raises concerns about the risks and safety associated with these models. This article provides an up-to-date survey of recent trends in AI safety research of GAI-LLMs from a computer scientist's perspective: specific and technical. In this survey, we explore the background and motivation for the identified harms and risks in the context of LLMs being generative language models; our survey differentiates by emphasising the need for unified theories of the distinct safety challenges in the research development and applications of LLMs. We start our discussion with a concise introduction to the workings of LLMs, supported by relevant literature. Then we discuss earlier research that has pointed out the fundamental constraints of generative models, or lack of understanding thereof (e.g., performance and safety trade-offs as LLMs scale in number of parameters). We provide a sufficient coverage of LLM alignment -- delving into various approaches, contending methods and present challenges associated with aligning LLMs with human preferences. By highlighting the gaps in the literature and possible implementation oversights, our aim is to create a comprehensive analysis that provides insights for addressing AI safety in LLMs and encourages the development of aligned and secure models. We conclude our survey by discussing future directions of LLMs for AI safety, offering insights into ongoing research in this critical area.

Read more

7/29/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Grounding and Evaluation for Large Language Models: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned (Survey)

Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Mehrnoosh Sameki, Ankur Taly

With the ongoing rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based systems in high-stakes domains, ensuring the trustworthiness, safety, and observability of these systems has become crucial. It is essential to evaluate and monitor AI systems not only for accuracy and quality-related metrics but also for robustness, bias, security, interpretability, and other responsible AI dimensions. We focus on large language models (LLMs) and other generative AI models, which present additional challenges such as hallucinations, harmful and manipulative content, and copyright infringement. In this survey article accompanying our KDD 2024 tutorial, we highlight a wide range of harms associated with generative AI systems, and survey state of the art approaches (along with open challenges) to address these harms.

Read more

7/19/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models

Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Kevin Chen, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.

Read more

7/1/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Current state of LLM Risks and AI Guardrails

Suriya Ganesh Ayyamperumal, Limin Ge

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly sophisticated, leading to widespread deployment in sensitive applications where safety and reliability are paramount. However, LLMs have inherent risks accompanying them, including bias, potential for unsafe actions, dataset poisoning, lack of explainability, hallucinations, and non-reproducibility. These risks necessitate the development of guardrails to align LLMs with desired behaviors and mitigate potential harm. This work explores the risks associated with deploying LLMs and evaluates current approaches to implementing guardrails and model alignment techniques. We examine intrinsic and extrinsic bias evaluation methods and discuss the importance of fairness metrics for responsible AI development. The safety and reliability of agentic LLMs (those capable of real-world actions) are explored, emphasizing the need for testability, fail-safes, and situational awareness. Technical strategies for securing LLMs are presented, including a layered protection model operating at external, secondary, and internal levels. System prompts, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architectures, and techniques to minimize bias and protect privacy are highlighted. Effective guardrail design requires a deep understanding of the LLM's intended use case, relevant regulations, and ethical considerations. Striking a balance between competing requirements, such as accuracy and privacy, remains an ongoing challenge. This work underscores the importance of continuous research and development to ensure the safe and responsible use of LLMs in real-world applications.

Read more

6/21/2024