Exploring Sound Change Over Time: A Review of Computational and Human Perception
0
🎯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper reviews current computational and human-based research on understanding how sounds change over time.
- It examines both computational models that analyze sound change, as well as studies on how humans perceive and adapt to evolving speech patterns.
- The review covers a range of relevant topics, from using phylogenetic reconstruction to track sound changes, to neural speech recognition models that can simulate human perception of sound changes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at two main ways researchers are studying how spoken language evolves over time. First, there are computational models that analyze sound changes by tracing the "family tree" of languages, similar to how biologists study the evolution of species. These models can identify patterns and trends in how sounds shift and morph across related languages.
On the human side, researchers have also been studying how people perceive and adapt to changes in speech. For example, some studies have used neural networks to simulate how the human brain processes and learns new pronunciations. This can provide insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying our ability to understand evolving language.
The paper provides an overview of the key computational and psychological perspectives on sound change, highlighting how the two approaches can complement each other to give a more holistic understanding of this fascinating linguistic phenomenon.
Technical Explanation
The paper first outlines the "computational perception" approach, which uses various computational models to analyze and track sound changes over time. This includes techniques like phylogenetic reconstruction, which infers the evolutionary relationships between languages based on their sound systems.
Other computational methods reviewed include using neural speech recognition models to simulate how humans perceive and adapt to sound changes, as well as computational analysis of lyric similarity to quantify changes in pronunciation and vocabulary over time.
The paper then covers the "human perception" perspective, which looks at how people actually experience and respond to evolving speech patterns. This includes research using predictive learning models to understand the cognitive mechanisms underlying our ability to adapt to new pronunciations and accents.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive review of the current state of research on computational and human-based approaches to sound change. However, it also notes some key limitations and areas for further exploration.
For the computational side, the authors acknowledge that many of the current models rely on simplified assumptions or limited datasets. Expanding the scope and realism of these simulations could yield additional insights.
On the human perception side, the authors highlight the need for more cross-cultural and longitudinal studies to fully capture the complexities of how people experience and internalize sound changes over time and across different language communities.
Additionally, the paper suggests that integrating the computational and human-based perspectives could lead to even more powerful frameworks for understanding the multifaceted nature of sound change.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable synthesis of the current computational and psychological research on sound change, a fundamental aspect of language evolution. By bridging these two complementary approaches, the review provides a nuanced understanding of how both technological models and human cognition contribute to the dynamic transformation of spoken language over time.
The insights gleaned from this work have implications for fields ranging from historical linguistics to speech technology development. Continued advancements in computational morphology and human perception studies could lead to more accurate reconstructions of language histories, better machine translation, and a deeper appreciation for the rich complexity of human communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
0
Exploring Sound Change Over Time: A Review of Computational and Human Perception
Siqi He, Wei Zhao
Computational and human perception are often considered separate approaches for studying sound changes over time; few works have touched on the intersection of both. To fill this research gap, we provide a pioneering review contrasting computational with human perception from the perspectives of methods and tasks. Overall, computational approaches rely on computer-driven models to perceive historical sound changes on etymological datasets, while human approaches use listener-driven models to perceive ongoing sound changes on recording corpora. Despite their differences, both approaches complement each other on phonetic and acoustic levels, showing the potential to achieve a more comprehensive perception of sound change. Moreover, we call for a comparative study on the datasets used by both approaches to investigate the influence of historical sound changes on ongoing changes. Lastly, we discuss the applications of sound change in computational linguistics, and point out that perceiving sound change alone is insufficient, as many processes of language change are complex, with entangled changes at syntactic, semantic, and phonetic levels.
Read more7/9/2024
📈
0
Are Sounds Sound for Phylogenetic Reconstruction?
Luise Hauser, Gerhard Jager, Taraka Rama, Johann-Mattis List, Alexandros Stamatakis
In traditional studies on language evolution, scholars often emphasize the importance of sound laws and sound correspondences for phylogenetic inference of language family trees. However, to date, computational approaches have typically not taken this potential into account. Most computational studies still rely on lexical cognates as major data source for phylogenetic reconstruction in linguistics, although there do exist a few studies in which authors praise the benefits of comparing words at the level of sound sequences. Building on (a) ten diverse datasets from different language families, and (b) state-of-the-art methods for automated cognate and sound correspondence detection, we test, for the first time, the performance of sound-based versus cognate-based approaches to phylogenetic reconstruction. Our results show that phylogenies reconstructed from lexical cognates are topologically closer, by approximately one third with respect to the generalized quartet distance on average, to the gold standard phylogenies than phylogenies reconstructed from sound correspondences.
Read more5/15/2024
0
Perception of Phonological Assimilation by Neural Speech Recognition Models
Charlotte Pouw, Marianne de Heer Kloots, Afra Alishahi, Willem Zuidema
Human listeners effortlessly compensate for phonological changes during speech perception, often unconsciously inferring the intended sounds. For example, listeners infer the underlying /n/ when hearing an utterance such as clea[m] pan, where [m] arises from place assimilation to the following labial [p]. This article explores how the neural speech recognition model Wav2Vec2 perceives assimilated sounds, and identifies the linguistic knowledge that is implemented by the model to compensate for assimilation during Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Using psycholinguistic stimuli, we systematically analyze how various linguistic context cues influence compensation patterns in the model's output. Complementing these behavioral experiments, our probing experiments indicate that the model shifts its interpretation of assimilated sounds from their acoustic form to their underlying form in its final layers. Finally, our causal intervention experiments suggest that the model relies on minimal phonological context cues to accomplish this shift. These findings represent a step towards better understanding the similarities and differences in phonological processing between neural ASR models and humans.
Read more6/24/2024
0
A Computational Analysis of Lyric Similarity Perception
Haven Kim, Taketo Akama
In musical compositions that include vocals, lyrics significantly contribute to artistic expression. Consequently, previous studies have introduced the concept of a recommendation system that suggests lyrics similar to a user's favorites or personalized preferences, aiding in the discovery of lyrics among millions of tracks. However, many of these systems do not fully consider human perceptions of lyric similarity, primarily due to limited research in this area. To bridge this gap, we conducted a comparative analysis of computational methods for modeling lyric similarity with human perception. Results indicated that computational models based on similarities between embeddings from pre-trained BERT-based models, the audio from which the lyrics are derived, and phonetic components are indicative of perceptual lyric similarity. This finding underscores the importance of semantic, stylistic, and phonetic similarities in human perception about lyric similarity. We anticipate that our findings will enhance the development of similarity-based lyric recommendation systems by offering pseudo-labels for neural network development and introducing objective evaluation metrics.
Read more8/28/2024