Perception of Phonological Assimilation by Neural Speech Recognition Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper investigates how neural speech recognition models perceive and process phonological assimilation, a common phenomenon in natural speech where sounds change due to their surrounding context.
- The authors examine how well these models handle assimilation and uncover potential limitations in their ability to accurately recognize phonologically-altered speech.
- The findings have implications for improving the robustness and real-world performance of speech recognition systems, particularly in handling the variability and complexity of natural language.
Plain English Explanation
When we speak, the sounds we make don't always come out exactly as they are written. For example, the 'n' in 'green book' might sound more like 'm' because the 'n' is being influenced by the 'b' sound that comes after it. This is called "phonological assimilation" and it's a normal part of how we naturally speak.
The researchers in this paper wanted to see how well artificial intelligence (AI) systems that do speech recognition - that is, turning spoken words into text - are able to handle this kind of assimilation. They tested various AI speech models to see if they could accurately recognize words and sentences even when the sounds were a bit blended together.
The results showed that the AI models struggled more with assimilated speech compared to clear, unaltered speech. This suggests that current speech recognition technology still has room for improvement when it comes to handling the flexibility and variation of real-world language use.
Understanding the limitations of AI in this area can help researchers develop more robust and human-like speech recognition systems in the future. This could lead to better virtual assistants, improved accessibility for people with speech challenges, and more reliable transcription and captioning services.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to investigate how well neural speech recognition models handle phonological assimilation, a common phenomenon where sounds in spoken language change due to their surrounding context. They tested various state-of-the-art models, including Predictive Learning Model Can Simulate Temporal Dynamics, Model for Early Word Acquisition Based on Realistic Scale, and Error-Preserving Automatic Speech Recognition for Young English on both assimilated and clearly-articulated speech.
The results showed that the models struggled more with recognizing words and sentences that contained phonologically-altered sounds compared to those with unmodified pronunciations. This suggests that current speech recognition technology has limitations in dealing with the natural variability and contextual influences present in human speech, as highlighted in related work such as You Don't Understand Me: Comparing ASR Results and MMM, Whatcha Say? Uncovering Distal and Proximal Context.
The insights from this research can inform efforts to improve the robustness and real-world performance of speech recognition systems, which have important applications in areas like virtual assistants, accessibility, and transcription services.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough examination of how neural speech recognition models handle phonological assimilation, a common yet challenging aspect of natural speech processing. The experimental design and analysis seem sound, and the findings clearly demonstrate the limitations of current technology in this domain.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific reasons why the models struggled with assimilated speech. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms and error patterns could yield additional insights to guide future model development.
Additionally, the experiments were conducted on a limited set of models and speech samples. Expanding the scope to a wider range of state-of-the-art architectures and diverse speech data, including less-resourced languages and accents, could strengthen the generalizability of the conclusions.
Conclusion
This research highlights the need for continued advancement in speech recognition technology to better handle the inherent variability and contextual influences present in human language. By uncovering the limitations of current neural models in dealing with phonological assimilation, the findings can inform the development of more robust and human-like speech recognition systems.
Improving the ability of AI to accurately process and understand natural, conversational speech has far-reaching implications for a variety of applications, from virtual assistants and accessibility tools to transcription services and language learning applications. The insights from this work represent an important step towards building speech recognition systems that can truly understand and engage with the richness and complexity of human communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Perception of Phonological Assimilation by Neural Speech Recognition Models
Charlotte Pouw, Marianne de Heer Kloots, Afra Alishahi, Willem Zuidema
Human listeners effortlessly compensate for phonological changes during speech perception, often unconsciously inferring the intended sounds. For example, listeners infer the underlying /n/ when hearing an utterance such as clea[m] pan, where [m] arises from place assimilation to the following labial [p]. This article explores how the neural speech recognition model Wav2Vec2 perceives assimilated sounds, and identifies the linguistic knowledge that is implemented by the model to compensate for assimilation during Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Using psycholinguistic stimuli, we systematically analyze how various linguistic context cues influence compensation patterns in the model's output. Complementing these behavioral experiments, our probing experiments indicate that the model shifts its interpretation of assimilated sounds from their acoustic form to their underlying form in its final layers. Finally, our causal intervention experiments suggest that the model relies on minimal phonological context cues to accomplish this shift. These findings represent a step towards better understanding the similarities and differences in phonological processing between neural ASR models and humans.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Human-like Linguistic Biases in Neural Speech Models: Phonetic Categorization and Phonotactic Constraints in Wav2Vec2.0
Marianne de Heer Kloots, Willem Zuidema
What do deep neural speech models know about phonology? Existing work has examined the encoding of individual linguistic units such as phonemes in these models. Here we investigate interactions between units. Inspired by classic experiments on human speech perception, we study how Wav2Vec2 resolves phonotactic constraints. We synthesize sounds on an acoustic continuum between /l/ and /r/ and embed them in controlled contexts where only /l/, only /r/, or neither occur in English. Like humans, Wav2Vec2 models show a bias towards the phonotactically admissable category in processing such ambiguous sounds. Using simple measures to analyze model internals on the level of individual stimuli, we find that this bias emerges in early layers of the model's Transformer module. This effect is amplified by ASR finetuning but also present in fully self-supervised models. Our approach demonstrates how controlled stimulus designs can help localize specific linguistic knowledge in neural speech models.
Read more7/4/2024
0
A predictive learning model can simulate temporal dynamics and context effects found in neural representations of continuous speech
Oli Danyi Liu, Hao Tang, Naomi Feldman, Sharon Goldwater
Speech perception involves storing and integrating sequentially presented items. Recent work in cognitive neuroscience has identified temporal and contextual characteristics in humans' neural encoding of speech that may facilitate this temporal processing. In this study, we simulated similar analyses with representations extracted from a computational model that was trained on unlabelled speech with the learning objective of predicting upcoming acoustics. Our simulations revealed temporal dynamics similar to those in brain signals, implying that these properties can arise without linguistic knowledge. Another property shared between brains and the model is that the encoding patterns of phonemes support some degree of cross-context generalization. However, we found evidence that the effectiveness of these generalizations depends on the specific contexts, which suggests that this analysis alone is insufficient to support the presence of context-invariant encoding.
Read more5/15/2024
🏷️
0
The formation of perceptual space in early phonetic acquisition: a cross-linguistic modeling approach
Frank Lihui Tan, Youngah Do
This study investigates how learners organize perceptual space in early phonetic acquisition by advancing previous studies in two key aspects. Firstly, it examines the shape of the learned hidden representation as well as its ability to categorize phonetic categories. Secondly, it explores the impact of training models on context-free acoustic information, without involving contextual cues, on phonetic acquisition, closely mimicking the early language learning stage. Using a cross-linguistic modeling approach, autoencoder models are trained on English and Mandarin and evaluated in both native and non-native conditions, following experimental conditions used in infant language perception studies. The results demonstrate that unsupervised bottom-up training on context-free acoustic information leads to comparable learned representations of perceptual space between native and non-native conditions for both English and Mandarin, resembling the early stage of universal listening in infants. These findings provide insights into the organization of perceptual space during early phonetic acquisition and contribute to our understanding of the formation and representation of phonetic categories.
Read more7/29/2024