Face It Yourselves: An LLM-Based Two-Stage Strategy to Localize Configuration Errors via Logs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a two-stage strategy using large language models (LLMs) to help locate configuration errors in software systems by analyzing log data.
- The approach first uses an LLM to classify log entries as indicative of a configuration error or not, then uses a second LLM to pinpoint the specific configuration file and line that caused the error.
- The authors evaluate their method on real-world configuration errors and show it can accurately identify the root cause of issues.
Plain English Explanation
Computers and software systems often have hidden "configuration" settings that need to be set correctly for everything to work properly. When these settings are wrong, it can cause all sorts of problems that get recorded in log files - essentially a computer's way of keeping a diary of what's happening.
The researchers in this paper developed a way to use powerful AI language models to automatically scan through those log files and figure out when a configuration error has occurred. Their two-step process first identifies which log entries indicate a configuration problem, then pinpoints exactly which configuration setting is causing the issue.
This is helpful because configuration errors can be really tricky to track down - the problem might be buried in thousands of log entries, and figuring out the root cause can take a skilled engineer a lot of time and effort. By automating this process with AI, the researchers hope to make it faster and easier for companies to diagnose and fix configuration problems in their software.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a two-stage approach for localizing configuration errors using large language models (LLMs).
In the first stage, the authors fine-tune an LLM on labeled log data to classify each log entry as indicating a configuration error or not. This allows the system to identify which log entries are relevant to the configuration issue.
In the second stage, the authors fine-tune a separate LLM to take the relevant log entries and pinpoint the specific configuration file and line number that caused the error. This is done by having the LLM generate relevant natural language descriptions of the configuration issue.
The authors evaluate their approach on real-world configuration errors from open-source software projects. They find that their two-stage LLM-based strategy can accurately identify the root cause of configuration problems, outperforming baseline methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for using LLMs to automate the process of diagnosing configuration errors in software systems. The two-stage approach seems well-designed, leveraging the strengths of language models to both detect and localize the root causes of issues.
That said, the evaluation is limited to a relatively small number of real-world configuration errors. It would be helpful to see the method tested on a larger and more diverse dataset to fully assess its capabilities and any potential biases or failure modes.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the interpretability or explainability of the LLM-based approach. While the system may be accurate, it would be useful to understand how the models arrive at their predictions and whether the justifications are comprehensible to human engineers.
Further research could also explore ways to make the LLM-based configuration error localization more interactive and user-friendly, perhaps integrating it with existing software development tools and workflows.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising application of large language models to the challenging problem of diagnosing configuration errors in software systems. By leveraging the pattern recognition and text generation capabilities of LLMs, the researchers have developed an automated approach that can accurately pinpoint the root causes of configuration issues.
While further research is needed to fully assess the method's capabilities and limitations, this work highlights the potential of AI-powered tools to streamline software debugging and maintenance tasks. As software systems grow ever more complex, techniques like this could become increasingly valuable for helping engineers quickly identify and resolve configuration problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Face It Yourselves: An LLM-Based Two-Stage Strategy to Localize Configuration Errors via Logs
Shiwen Shan, Yintong Huo, Yuxin Su, Yichen Li, Dan Li, Zibin Zheng
Configurable software systems are prone to configuration errors, resulting in significant losses to companies. However, diagnosing these errors is challenging due to the vast and complex configuration space. These errors pose significant challenges for both experienced maintainers and new end-users, particularly those without access to the source code of the software systems. Given that logs are easily accessible to most end-users, we conduct a preliminary study to outline the challenges and opportunities of utilizing logs in localizing configuration errors. Based on the insights gained from the preliminary study, we propose an LLM-based two-stage strategy for end-users to localize the root-cause configuration properties based on logs. We further implement a tool, LogConfigLocalizer, aligned with the design of the aforementioned strategy, hoping to assist end-users in coping with configuration errors through log analysis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to localize the root-cause configuration properties for end-users based on Large Language Models~(LLMs) and logs. We evaluate the proposed strategy on Hadoop by LogConfigLocalizer and prove its efficiency with an average accuracy as high as 99.91%. Additionally, we also demonstrate the effectiveness and necessity of different phases of the methodology by comparing it with two other variants and a baseline tool. Moreover, we validate the proposed methodology through a practical case study to demonstrate its effectiveness and feasibility.
Read more4/3/2024
✅
0
Configuration Validation with Large Language Models
Xinyu Lian, Yinfang Chen, Runxiang Cheng, Jie Huang, Parth Thakkar, Minjia Zhang, Tianyin Xu
Misconfigurations are major causes of software failures. Existing practices rely on developer-written rules or test cases to validate configurations, which are expensive. Machine learning (ML) for configuration validation is considered a promising direction, but has been facing challenges such as the need of large-scale field data and system-specific models. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in addressing some of the long-lasting limitations of ML-based configuration validation. We present a first analysis on the feasibility and effectiveness of using LLMs for configuration validation. We empirically evaluate LLMs as configuration validators by developing a generic LLM-based configuration validation framework, named Ciri. Ciri employs effective prompt engineering with few-shot learning based on both valid configuration and misconfiguration data. Ciri checks outputs from LLMs when producing results, addressing hallucination and nondeterminism of LLMs. We evaluate Ciri's validation effectiveness on eight popular LLMs using configuration data of ten widely deployed open-source systems. Our analysis (1) confirms the potential of using LLMs for configuration validation, (2) explores design space of LLMbased validators like Ciri, and (3) reveals open challenges such as ineffectiveness in detecting certain types of misconfigurations and biases towards popular configuration parameters.
Read more4/3/2024
0
Multi-stage Large Language Model Correction for Speech Recognition
Jie Pu, Thai-Son Nguyen, Sebastian Stuker
In this paper, we investigate the usage of large language models (LLMs) to improve the performance of competitive speech recognition systems. Different from previous LLM-based ASR error correction methods, we propose a novel multi-stage approach that utilizes uncertainty estimation of ASR outputs and reasoning capability of LLMs. Specifically, the proposed approach has two stages: the first stage is about ASR uncertainty estimation and exploits N-best list hypotheses to identify less reliable transcriptions; The second stage works on these identified transcriptions and performs LLM-based corrections. This correction task is formulated as a multi-step rule-based LLM reasoning process, which uses explicitly written rules in prompts to decompose the task into concrete reasoning steps. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method by showing 10% ~ 20% relative improvement in WER over competitive ASR systems -- across multiple test domains and in zero-shot settings.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Supporting Cross-language Cross-project Bug Localization Using Pre-trained Language Models
Mahinthan Chandramohan, Dai Quoc Nguyen, Padmanabhan Krishnan, Jovan Jancic
Automatically locating a bug within a large codebase remains a significant challenge for developers. Existing techniques often struggle with generalizability and deployment due to their reliance on application-specific data and large model sizes. This paper proposes a novel pre-trained language model (PLM) based technique for bug localization that transcends project and language boundaries. Our approach leverages contrastive learning to enhance the representation of bug reports and source code. It then utilizes a novel ranking approach that combines commit messages and code segments. Additionally, we introduce a knowledge distillation technique that reduces model size for practical deployment without compromising performance. This paper presents several key benefits. By incorporating code segment and commit message analysis alongside traditional file-level examination, our technique achieves better bug localization accuracy. Furthermore, our model excels at generalizability - trained on code from various projects and languages, it can effectively identify bugs in unseen codebases. To address computational limitations, we propose a CPU-compatible solution. In essence, proposed work presents a highly effective, generalizable, and efficient bug localization technique with the potential to real-world deployment.
Read more7/4/2024