Supporting Cross-language Cross-project Bug Localization Using Pre-trained Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.02732 - Published 7/4/2024 by Mahinthan Chandramohan, Dai Quoc Nguyen, Padmanabhan Krishnan, Jovan Jancic
Total Score

0

Supporting Cross-language Cross-project Bug Localization Using Pre-trained Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using pre-trained language models for cross-language, cross-project bug localization, which is the task of identifying the source code files responsible for a reported bug.
  • The researchers investigate how well large language models like BERT can be adapted to this task, which is important for automating software maintenance and improving developer productivity.
  • The paper presents a novel knowledge distillation approach that allows these language models to be fine-tuned on bug localization data without requiring access to the original pre-training data.

Plain English Explanation

When software has bugs, developers need to figure out which parts of the code are causing the problems. This process, called bug localization, is time-consuming and tedious. To help automate this task, the researchers in this paper explored using large language models like BERT, which are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data.

The key insight is that these pre-trained models might be able to understand the natural language used in bug reports and source code, and use that knowledge to identify the relevant code files. However, the researchers faced a challenge - the bug localization data they had access to was in a different language and from different software projects than the data the language models were originally trained on.

To address this, the researchers developed a novel "knowledge distillation" technique. This allowed them to fine-tune the language models on the bug localization data without needing access to the original training data. The end result is a system that can take bug reports in one language and identify the responsible code files, even if the training data comes from a different language and software project.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework for cross-language, cross-project bug localization using pre-trained language models. The key components are:

  1. Pre-trained Language Model: The researchers experiment with using large language models like BERT, which are trained on massive amounts of text data and can capture rich semantic and syntactic knowledge.

  2. Knowledge Distillation: Since the bug localization data is in a different language and domain than the pre-training data, the researchers use a knowledge distillation approach to fine-tune the language model. This allows them to specialize the model for the bug localization task without requiring access to the original pre-training data.

  3. Cross-language, Cross-project Transfer: The fine-tuned language model is then evaluated on bug localization tasks across different languages and software projects, demonstrating the ability to generalize beyond the training data.

The paper's experiments show that this approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods for cross-language, cross-project bug localization, highlighting the potential of large language models for automating software maintenance tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for leveraging large pre-trained language models to tackle the challenge of cross-language, cross-project bug localization. The proposed knowledge distillation approach is a clever way to specialize the models for this task without requiring access to the original pre-training data.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Data Diversity: The experiments only consider a limited set of languages and software projects. Evaluating the approach on a more diverse set of data would help assess its broader applicability.

  2. Interpretability: As with many deep learning models, the internal workings of the fine-tuned language model may be opaque. Improving the interpretability of the model's bug localization decisions could make the system more trustworthy and easier to debug.

  3. Computational Efficiency: Fine-tuning large language models can be computationally expensive. Exploring more efficient fine-tuning approaches or model architectures could make the system more practical for real-world deployment.

Despite these caveats, the paper presents an important step forward in leveraging powerful language models for automating software engineering tasks. Continued research in this direction could lead to significant improvements in developer productivity and software quality.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for cross-language, cross-project bug localization using pre-trained language models and knowledge distillation. By fine-tuning large language models like BERT on bug localization data, the researchers demonstrate the potential of these models to understand the natural language used in bug reports and source code, and to identify the relevant code files responsible for reported bugs.

The proposed framework outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods, highlighting the power of large language models for automating software maintenance tasks. While there are still some limitations to address, this work represents an exciting advancement in the field of code-mixed probes and the broader use of large language models for software engineering.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Supporting Cross-language Cross-project Bug Localization Using Pre-trained Language Models
Total Score

0

Supporting Cross-language Cross-project Bug Localization Using Pre-trained Language Models

Mahinthan Chandramohan, Dai Quoc Nguyen, Padmanabhan Krishnan, Jovan Jancic

Automatically locating a bug within a large codebase remains a significant challenge for developers. Existing techniques often struggle with generalizability and deployment due to their reliance on application-specific data and large model sizes. This paper proposes a novel pre-trained language model (PLM) based technique for bug localization that transcends project and language boundaries. Our approach leverages contrastive learning to enhance the representation of bug reports and source code. It then utilizes a novel ranking approach that combines commit messages and code segments. Additionally, we introduce a knowledge distillation technique that reduces model size for practical deployment without compromising performance. This paper presents several key benefits. By incorporating code segment and commit message analysis alongside traditional file-level examination, our technique achieves better bug localization accuracy. Furthermore, our model excels at generalizability - trained on code from various projects and languages, it can effectively identify bugs in unseen codebases. To address computational limitations, we propose a CPU-compatible solution. In essence, proposed work presents a highly effective, generalizable, and efficient bug localization technique with the potential to real-world deployment.

Read more

7/4/2024

Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection

Micheline B'en'edicte Moumoula, Abdoul Kader Kabore, Jacques Klein, Tegawend'e Bissyande

With the involvement of multiple programming languages in modern software development, cross-lingual code clone detection has gained traction with the software engineering community. Numerous studies have explored this topic, proposing various promising approaches. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning in recent years, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), which have demonstrated their ability to tackle various tasks, this paper revisits cross-lingual code clone detection. We investigate the capabilities of four (04) LLMs and eight (08) prompts for the identification of cross-lingual code clones. Additionally, we evaluate a pre-trained embedding model to assess the effectiveness of the generated representations for classifying clone and non-clone pairs. Both studies (based on LLMs and Embedding models) are evaluated using two widely used cross-lingual datasets, XLCoST and CodeNet. Our results show that LLMs can achieve high F1 scores, up to 0.98, for straightforward programming examples (e.g., from XLCoST). However, they not only perform less well on programs associated with complex programming challenges but also do not necessarily understand the meaning of code clones in a cross-lingual setting. We show that embedding models used to represent code fragments from different programming languages in the same representation space enable the training of a basic classifier that outperforms all LLMs by ~2 and ~24 percentage points on the XLCoST and CodeNet datasets, respectively. This finding suggests that, despite the apparent capabilities of LLMs, embeddings provided by embedding models offer suitable representations to achieve state-of-the-art performance in cross-lingual code clone detection.

Read more

8/13/2024

BLAZE: Cross-Language and Cross-Project Bug Localization via Dynamic Chunking and Hard Example Learning
Total Score

0

BLAZE: Cross-Language and Cross-Project Bug Localization via Dynamic Chunking and Hard Example Learning

Partha Chakraborty, Mahmoud Alfadel, Meiyappan Nagappan

Software bugs require developers to exert significant effort to identify and resolve them, often consuming about one-third of their time. Bug localization, the process of pinpointing the exact source code files that need modification, is crucial in reducing this effort. Existing bug localization tools, typically reliant on deep learning techniques, face limitations in cross-project applicability and effectiveness in multi-language environments. Recent advancements with Large Language Models (LLMs) offer detailed representations for bug localization. However, they encounter challenges with limited context windows and mapping accuracy. To address these issues, we propose BLAZE, an approach that employs dynamic chunking and hard example learning. First, BLAZE dynamically segments source code to minimize continuity loss. Then, BLAZE fine-tunes a GPT-based model using challenging bug cases, in order to enhance cross-project and cross-language bug localization. To support the capability of BLAZE, we create the BEETLEBOX dataset, which comprises 26,321 bugs from 29 large and thriving open-source projects across five different programming languages (Java, C++, Python, Go, and JavaScript). Our evaluations of BLAZE on three benchmark datasets BEETLEBOX, SWE-Bench, and Ye et al. demonstrate substantial improvements compared to six state-of-the-art baselines. Specifically, BLAZE achieves up to an increase of 120% in Top 1 accuracy, 144% in Mean Average Precision (MAP), and 100% in Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR). An extensive ablation study confirms the contributions of our pipeline components to the overall performance enhancement.

Read more

8/20/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Harnessing Large Language Models for Software Vulnerability Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study

Karl Tamberg, Hayretdin Bahsi

Despite various approaches being employed to detect vulnerabilities, the number of reported vulnerabilities shows an upward trend over the years. This suggests the problems are not caught before the code is released, which could be caused by many factors, like lack of awareness, limited efficacy of the existing vulnerability detection tools or the tools not being user-friendly. To help combat some issues with traditional vulnerability detection tools, we propose using large language models (LLMs) to assist in finding vulnerabilities in source code. LLMs have shown a remarkable ability to understand and generate code, underlining their potential in code-related tasks. The aim is to test multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and identify the best prompting strategies, allowing extraction of the best value from the LLMs. We provide an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the LLM-based approach and compare the results to those of traditional static analysis tools. We find that LLMs can pinpoint many more issues than traditional static analysis tools, outperforming traditional tools in terms of recall and F1 scores. The results should benefit software developers and security analysts responsible for ensuring that the code is free of vulnerabilities.

Read more

5/27/2024