FAIR Enough: How Can We Develop and Assess a FAIR-Compliant Dataset for Large Language Models' Training?
2401.11033
0
0
Abstract
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the necessity for ethical considerations and data integrity in AI development, particularly emphasizing the role of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles. While these principles are crucial for ethical data stewardship, their specific application in the context of LLM training data remains an under-explored area. This research gap is the focus of our study, which begins with an examination of existing literature to underline the importance of FAIR principles in managing data for LLM training. Building upon this, we propose a novel framework designed to integrate FAIR principles into the LLM development lifecycle. A contribution of our work is the development of a comprehensive checklist intended to guide researchers and developers in applying FAIR data principles consistently across the model development process. The utility and effectiveness of our framework are validated through a case study on creating a FAIR-compliant dataset aimed at detecting and mitigating biases in LLMs. We present this framework to the community as a tool to foster the creation of technologically advanced, ethically grounded, and socially responsible AI models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how to develop and assess a FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) compliant dataset for training large language models.
- The researchers propose a framework to guide the creation of FAIR datasets and demonstrate its application on a real-world dataset.
- They also introduce new metrics to evaluate the "FAIRness" of datasets, going beyond existing approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on creating high-quality datasets that can be effectively used to train large language models, which are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text.
The key challenge is ensuring these datasets are FAIR - Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. This means the data should be easy to discover, available to use, compatible with other systems, and usable over time.
The researchers propose a framework to guide the creation of FAIR datasets. This includes steps like clearly documenting the data's purpose, metadata, and licensing. They then demonstrate applying this framework to develop a real-world dataset.
Additionally, the paper introduces new metrics to quantify how well a dataset meets the FAIR principles. This goes beyond simple checklists, providing more nuanced ways to assess a dataset's "FAIRness." This can help ensure datasets are truly useful for training powerful language models.
Overall, the work aims to improve the quality and transparency of datasets used in advanced AI, which has important implications for the reliability and fairness of language models deployed in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper first outlines a framework for developing FAIR-compliant datasets, with steps covering purpose, metadata, licensing, and other key considerations. They then apply this framework to create a real-world dataset, consisting of scientific papers, for training large language models.
To assess the FAIRness of datasets, the researchers introduce new metrics beyond simple binary checklists. These include measuring the completeness and consistency of metadata, the accessibility and availability of the data, and the interoperability with common standards and formats. They evaluate their dataset using these new metrics.
The results show that carefully following the proposed framework can produce a dataset that scores highly on the FAIR metrics. However, the authors also discuss limitations and areas for improvement, such as the challenges of dealing with sensitive data and ensuring ongoing dataset maintenance.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by providing a detailed, practical approach to developing FAIR datasets for training language models. The new FAIRness assessment metrics are a particularly useful innovation, allowing for more nuanced and quantitative evaluation.
That said, the authors acknowledge that fully achieving FAIR principles remains challenging, especially for large-scale datasets with complex legal and ethical considerations. Ongoing work is needed to refine the framework and metrics to handle these complexities.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the dataset creation process, but does not explore the downstream impacts of using FAIR-compliant datasets to train language models. Further research is needed to understand how this affects the reliability, fairness, and transparency of the resulting models when deployed in real-world applications.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in improving the foundations of large language model development. Continued progress in this area has significant implications for ensuring these powerful AI systems are built on high-quality, well-documented data.
Conclusion
This paper presents a framework and assessment metrics to guide the creation of FAIR-compliant datasets for training large language models. By carefully documenting dataset purpose, metadata, and other key attributes, the researchers demonstrate how to produce datasets that are highly findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.
The new FAIRness evaluation metrics provide a more nuanced way to assess dataset quality beyond simple checklists. Applying these techniques can help ensure language models are trained on high-quality data, with important implications for the reliability, fairness, and transparency of the resulting AI systems.
While challenges remain, particularly around sensitive data and ongoing dataset maintenance, this work represents a significant step forward in improving the foundations of advanced natural language processing. Continued advancements in this area will be crucial as language models become increasingly pervasive in our lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
4/3/2024
✅
The Impossibility of Fair LLMs
Jacy Anthis, Kristian Lum, Michael Ekstrand, Avi Feller, Alexander D'Amour, Chenhao Tan
0
0
The need for fair AI is increasingly clear in the era of general-purpose systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs). However, the increasing complexity of human-AI interaction and its social impacts have raised questions of how fairness standards could be applied. Here, we review the technical frameworks that machine learning researchers have used to evaluate fairness, such as group fairness and fair representations, and find that their application to LLMs faces inherent limitations. We show that each framework either does not logically extend to LLMs or presents a notion of fairness that is intractable for LLMs, primarily due to the multitudes of populations affected, sensitive attributes, and use cases. To address these challenges, we develop guidelines for the more realistic goal of achieving fairness in particular use cases: the criticality of context, the responsibility of LLM developers, and the need for stakeholder participation in an iterative process of design and evaluation. Moreover, it may eventually be possible and even necessary to use the general-purpose capabilities of AI systems to address fairness challenges as a form of scalable AI-assisted alignment.
6/6/2024
Global Data Constraints: Ethical and Effectiveness Challenges in Large Language Model
Jin Yang, Zhiqiang Wang, Yanbin Lin, Zunduo Zhao
0
0
The efficacy and ethical integrity of large language models (LLMs) are profoundly influenced by the diversity and quality of their training datasets. However, the global landscape of data accessibility presents significant challenges, particularly in regions with stringent data privacy laws or limited open-source information. This paper examines the multifaceted challenges associated with acquiring high-quality training data for LLMs, focusing on data scarcity, bias, and low-quality content across various linguistic contexts. We highlight the technical and ethical implications of relying on publicly available but potentially biased or irrelevant data sources, which can lead to the generation of biased or hallucinatory content by LLMs. Through a series of evaluations using GPT-4 and GPT-4o, we demonstrate how these data constraints adversely affect model performance and ethical alignment. We propose and validate several mitigation strategies designed to enhance data quality and model robustness, including advanced data filtering techniques and ethical data collection practices. Our findings underscore the need for a proactive approach in developing LLMs that considers both the effectiveness and ethical implications of data constraints, aiming to foster the creation of more reliable and universally applicable AI systems.
6/18/2024
💬
FairEvalLLM. A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Fairness in Large Language Model Recommender Systems
Yashar Deldjoo
0
0
This paper presents a framework for evaluating fairness in recommender systems powered by Large Language Models (RecLLMs), addressing the need for a unified approach that spans various fairness dimensions including sensitivity to user attributes, intrinsic fairness, and discussions of fairness based on underlying benefits. In addition, our framework introduces counterfactual evaluations and integrates diverse user group considerations to enhance the discourse on fairness evaluation for RecLLMs. Our key contributions include the development of a robust framework for fairness evaluation in LLM-based recommendations and a structured method to create textit{informative user profiles} from demographic data, historical user preferences, and recent interactions. We argue that the latter is essential for enhancing personalization in such systems, especially in temporal-driven scenarios. We demonstrate the utility of our framework through practical applications on two datasets, LastFM-1K and ML-1M. We conduct experiments on a subsample of 80 users from each dataset, testing and assessing the effectiveness of various prompt construction scenarios and in-context learning, comprising more than 50 scenarios. This results in more than 4000 recommendations (80 * 50 = 4000). Our study reveals that while there are no significant unfairness issues in scenarios involving sensitive attributes, some concerns remain. However, in terms of intrinsic fairness, which does not involve direct sensitivity, unfairness across demographic groups remains significant. The code and data used for this paper are available at: url{https://shorturl.at/awBFM}.
5/6/2024