Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
2404.01349
0
0
💬
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the complex copyright issues that arise with the use of generative AI systems for creating digital art and other content.
- The authors take a multidisciplinary approach, drawing on legal, technical, and artistic perspectives to examine the boundaries and ambiguities in current copyright law as it applies to AI-generated works.
- Key topics include the challenges of authorship and ownership, potential infringement concerns, and the role of technologies like watermarking in protecting intellectual property.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the tricky copyright questions that come up when using AI systems to create digital art, images, and other content. The authors look at this issue from different angles - the legal side, the technical side, and the artistic side.
Copyright law wasn't really designed with AI-generated works in mind, so there's a lot of uncertainty around who owns the rights to these creations and whether they could infringe on existing copyrights. For example, if an AI system trains on a large dataset of images and then generates a new image, it's not clear if that new image can be considered the "original work" of the AI, the human who prompted the AI, the company that built the AI, or someone else.
The paper also examines technologies like digital watermarking that could be used to help protect the intellectual property rights of AI-generated content. Overall, the goal is to explore these complex and murky copyright issues from multiple disciplinary perspectives to try to find some clarity and solutions.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the copyright challenges posed by generative AI systems across legal, technical, and artistic domains. From the legal perspective, the authors analyze existing copyright frameworks and case law to illuminate the ambiguities and limitations when applied to AI-generated works. Key issues include establishing authorship, the scope of fair use, and the potential for infringement.
On the technical side, the paper explores watermarking and other forensic techniques that could be used to track the provenance and ownership of AI-generated content. The authors discuss the tradeoffs between the robustness of such techniques and their potential impact on the user experience and creative process.
From an artistic lens, the paper delves into the evolving role of the human creator in an AI-powered creative landscape. It examines how notions of creativity, originality, and artistic expression may need to be reconsidered in light of generative AI capabilities.
Throughout the paper, the authors highlight the inherent tensions and complexities involved, underscoring the need for a multidisciplinary approach to address the uncertain boundaries of copyright in the generative AI domain.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and thoughtful exploration of the copyright challenges posed by generative AI, drawing attention to the nuanced legal, technical, and artistic considerations. By taking a multidisciplinary approach, the authors effectively illustrate the depth and breadth of the issues at hand.
However, the analysis could be strengthened by delving deeper into some of the specific copyright case law and legal precedents that may inform the application of existing frameworks to AI-generated works. Additionally, the paper would benefit from a more detailed discussion of the potential limitations and pitfalls of technological solutions like watermarking, such as their susceptibility to adversarial attacks or the risk of creating an overly restrictive creative environment.
Further research may also be warranted to better understand the evolving perspectives and concerns of artists, creators, and the general public as the use of generative AI in content creation becomes more widespread. Incorporating these diverse voices could lend additional nuance and insights to the analysis.
Overall, the paper represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing dialogue around the complex intersection of copyright law and the rapidly advancing field of generative AI. The authors have successfully highlighted the need for multidisciplinary collaboration and creative problem-solving to navigate these uncertain boundaries.
Conclusion
This paper underscores the significant copyright challenges presented by the rise of generative AI systems in the creation of digital art, images, and other content. By examining the issue through legal, technical, and artistic lenses, the authors have illuminated the inherent ambiguities and tensions within current copyright frameworks.
The key takeaway is that as generative AI capabilities continue to evolve, policymakers, technologists, and artists will need to work together to develop new approaches and frameworks to protect intellectual property rights while also fostering creativity and innovation. This will require careful consideration of the nuances and tradeoffs involved, as well as an openness to rethinking traditional notions of authorship, originality, and the creative process.
Ultimately, the successful navigation of these uncertain copyright boundaries will have significant implications for the future of digital art, content creation, and the broader creative landscape. The insights and recommendations provided in this paper offer a valuable starting point for tackling these complex challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✅
The Impossibility of Fair LLMs
Jacy Anthis, Kristian Lum, Michael Ekstrand, Avi Feller, Alexander D'Amour, Chenhao Tan
0
0
The need for fair AI is increasingly clear in the era of general-purpose systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs). However, the increasing complexity of human-AI interaction and its social impacts have raised questions of how fairness standards could be applied. Here, we review the technical frameworks that machine learning researchers have used to evaluate fairness, such as group fairness and fair representations, and find that their application to LLMs faces inherent limitations. We show that each framework either does not logically extend to LLMs or presents a notion of fairness that is intractable for LLMs, primarily due to the multitudes of populations affected, sensitive attributes, and use cases. To address these challenges, we develop guidelines for the more realistic goal of achieving fairness in particular use cases: the criticality of context, the responsibility of LLM developers, and the need for stakeholder participation in an iterative process of design and evaluation. Moreover, it may eventually be possible and even necessary to use the general-purpose capabilities of AI systems to address fairness challenges as a form of scalable AI-assisted alignment.
6/6/2024
💬
A survey on fairness of large language models in e-commerce: progress, application, and challenge
Qingyang Ren, Zilin Jiang, Jinghan Cao, Sijia Li, Chiqu Li, Yiyang Liu, Shuning Huo, Tiange He, Yuan Chen
0
0
This survey explores the fairness of large language models (LLMs) in e-commerce, examining their progress, applications, and the challenges they face. LLMs have become pivotal in the e-commerce domain, offering innovative solutions and enhancing customer experiences. This work presents a comprehensive survey on the applications and challenges of LLMs in e-commerce. The paper begins by introducing the key principles underlying the use of LLMs in e-commerce, detailing the processes of pretraining, fine-tuning, and prompting that tailor these models to specific needs. It then explores the varied applications of LLMs in e-commerce, including product reviews, where they synthesize and analyze customer feedback; product recommendations, where they leverage consumer data to suggest relevant items; product information translation, enhancing global accessibility; and product question and answer sections, where they automate customer support. The paper critically addresses the fairness challenges in e-commerce, highlighting how biases in training data and algorithms can lead to unfair outcomes, such as reinforcing stereotypes or discriminating against certain groups. These issues not only undermine consumer trust, but also raise ethical and legal concerns. Finally, the work outlines future research directions, emphasizing the need for more equitable and transparent LLMs in e-commerce. It advocates for ongoing efforts to mitigate biases and improve the fairness of these systems, ensuring they serve diverse global markets effectively and ethically. Through this comprehensive analysis, the survey provides a holistic view of the current landscape of LLMs in e-commerce, offering insights into their potential and limitations, and guiding future endeavors in creating fairer and more inclusive e-commerce environments.
6/26/2024
Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers
Yuan Wang, Xuyang Wu, Hsin-Tai Wu, Zhiqiang Tao, Yi Fang
0
0
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in information retrieval has raised a critical reevaluation of fairness in the text-ranking models. LLMs, such as GPT models and Llama2, have shown effectiveness in natural language understanding tasks, and prior works (e.g., RankGPT) have also demonstrated that the LLMs exhibit better performance than the traditional ranking models in the ranking task. However, their fairness remains largely unexplored. This paper presents an empirical study evaluating these LLMs using the TREC Fair Ranking dataset, focusing on the representation of binary protected attributes such as gender and geographic location, which are historically underrepresented in search outcomes. Our analysis delves into how these LLMs handle queries and documents related to these attributes, aiming to uncover biases in their ranking algorithms. We assess fairness from both user and content perspectives, contributing an empirical benchmark for evaluating LLMs as the fair ranker.
6/27/2024
💬
Confronting LLMs with Traditional ML: Rethinking the Fairness of Large Language Models in Tabular Classifications
Yanchen Liu, Srishti Gautam, Jiaqi Ma, Himabindu Lakkaraju
0
0
Recent literature has suggested the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to make classifications for tabular tasks. However, LLMs have been shown to exhibit harmful social biases that reflect the stereotypes and inequalities present in society. To this end, as well as the widespread use of tabular data in many high-stake applications, it is important to explore the following questions: what sources of information do LLMs draw upon when making classifications for tabular tasks; whether and to what extent are LLM classifications for tabular data influenced by social biases and stereotypes; and what are the consequential implications for fairness? Through a series of experiments, we delve into these questions and show that LLMs tend to inherit social biases from their training data which significantly impact their fairness in tabular classification tasks. Furthermore, our investigations show that in the context of bias mitigation, though in-context learning and finetuning have a moderate effect, the fairness metric gap between different subgroups is still larger than that in traditional machine learning models, such as Random Forest and shallow Neural Networks. This observation emphasizes that the social biases are inherent within the LLMs themselves and inherited from their pretraining corpus, not only from the downstream task datasets. Besides, we demonstrate that label-flipping of in-context examples can significantly reduce biases, further highlighting the presence of inherent bias within LLMs.
4/4/2024