The Impossibility of Fair LLMs
2406.03198
0
0
✅
Abstract
The need for fair AI is increasingly clear in the era of general-purpose systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs). However, the increasing complexity of human-AI interaction and its social impacts have raised questions of how fairness standards could be applied. Here, we review the technical frameworks that machine learning researchers have used to evaluate fairness, such as group fairness and fair representations, and find that their application to LLMs faces inherent limitations. We show that each framework either does not logically extend to LLMs or presents a notion of fairness that is intractable for LLMs, primarily due to the multitudes of populations affected, sensitive attributes, and use cases. To address these challenges, we develop guidelines for the more realistic goal of achieving fairness in particular use cases: the criticality of context, the responsibility of LLM developers, and the need for stakeholder participation in an iterative process of design and evaluation. Moreover, it may eventually be possible and even necessary to use the general-purpose capabilities of AI systems to address fairness challenges as a form of scalable AI-assisted alignment.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the fundamental challenges in achieving fair large language models (LLMs) and why true fairness may be impossible to attain.
- It examines recent research on fairness in LLMs and highlights the inherent tensions between different notions of fairness.
- The paper concludes that fairness in LLMs is an elusive goal, as any attempt to enforce one type of fairness will inevitably lead to unfairness in other respects.
Plain English Explanation
The paper argues that it is incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to create truly "fair" large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT or other state-of-the-art models. The reason for this is that there are many different ways to define fairness, and trying to optimize for one type of fairness often comes at the expense of another.
For example, one notion of fairness might be to ensure that the model treats people from all backgrounds and demographics equally. But this could mean the model ends up producing biased or discriminatory outputs, which would violate a different conception of fairness. Alternatively, the model could be designed to avoid biased outputs, but this might make the model less accurate or useful for certain groups of people.
The paper reviews recent research on fairness in LLMs and shows how these conflicting fairness objectives play out in practice. It also discusses empirical studies that have found significant fairness issues in state-of-the-art LLMs.
Ultimately, the authors conclude that true fairness in LLMs is likely an unattainable goal. Any attempts to enforce one type of fairness will inevitably lead to unfairness in other respects. This is a fundamental tension that arises from the complexity of language and the inherent biases present in the data used to train these models.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing recent research on fairness in LLMs, which has revealed significant challenges in achieving fairness. The authors highlight the inherent tensions between different notions of fairness, such as demographic parity, equal opportunity, and individual fairness.
The paper then presents a formal framework for specifying and assessing fairness in generative AI systems, which they apply to the context of LLMs. This framework reveals that attempts to enforce one type of fairness will inevitably lead to unfairness in other respects.
The authors support this claim with empirical evidence, citing studies that have found significant fairness issues in state-of-the-art LLMs, such as biases in language generation and ranking tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a convincing case that achieving true fairness in LLMs is an extremely challenging, if not impossible, task. The authors' formal framework for defining and assessing fairness provides a valuable analytical tool for understanding the inherent tensions in this problem.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential causes of these fairness issues, such as the biases present in the training data or the limitations of current fairness-enhancing techniques. Additionally, the paper could have provided more concrete examples or case studies to illustrate the tradeoffs between different fairness objectives.
Furthermore, the paper could have discussed potential avenues for mitigating fairness issues in LLMs, such as improved data curation, algorithmic interventions, or human oversight. While the authors acknowledge the difficulty of the problem, they could have offered more constructive suggestions for addressing it.
Conclusion
This paper makes a compelling argument that the pursuit of fairness in large language models is fraught with fundamental challenges and inherent tradeoffs. The authors demonstrate that attempts to enforce one type of fairness will inevitably lead to unfairness in other respects, rendering true fairness in LLMs an elusive goal.
The implications of this research are significant, as LLMs are becoming increasingly prevalent in a wide range of applications, from e-commerce to language generation. This paper serves as an important wake-up call for the AI research community, urging them to grapple with the complex and intractable nature of fairness in these powerful models. Ultimately, this work highlights the need for continued vigilance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a deeper understanding of the societal impacts of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🐍
Fairness of ChatGPT
Yunqi Li, Lanjing Zhang, Yongfeng Zhang
0
0
Understanding and addressing unfairness in LLMs are crucial for responsible AI deployment. However, there is a limited number of quantitative analyses and in-depth studies regarding fairness evaluations in LLMs, especially when applying LLMs to high-stakes fields. This work aims to fill this gap by providing a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness and fairness of LLMs using ChatGPT as a study case. We focus on assessing ChatGPT's performance in high-takes fields including education, criminology, finance and healthcare. To conduct a thorough evaluation, we consider both group fairness and individual fairness metrics. We also observe the disparities in ChatGPT's outputs under a set of biased or unbiased prompts. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of LLMs' fairness performance, facilitates bias mitigation and fosters the development of responsible AI systems.
5/7/2024
💬
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
4/3/2024
🔍
Navigating LLM Ethics: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions
Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Yiming Xu, Connor Phillips
0
0
This study addresses ethical issues surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) within the field of artificial intelligence. It explores the common ethical challenges posed by both LLMs and other AI systems, such as privacy and fairness, as well as ethical challenges uniquely arising from LLMs. It highlights challenges such as hallucination, verifiable accountability, and decoding censorship complexity, which are unique to LLMs and distinct from those encountered in traditional AI systems. The study underscores the need to tackle these complexities to ensure accountability, reduce biases, and enhance transparency in the influential role that LLMs play in shaping information dissemination. It proposes mitigation strategies and future directions for LLM ethics, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration. It recommends ethical frameworks tailored to specific domains and dynamic auditing systems adapted to diverse contexts. This roadmap aims to guide responsible development and integration of LLMs, envisioning a future where ethical considerations govern AI advancements in society.
7/1/2024
💬
A survey on fairness of large language models in e-commerce: progress, application, and challenge
Qingyang Ren, Zilin Jiang, Jinghan Cao, Sijia Li, Chiqu Li, Yiyang Liu, Shuning Huo, Tiange He, Yuan Chen
0
0
This survey explores the fairness of large language models (LLMs) in e-commerce, examining their progress, applications, and the challenges they face. LLMs have become pivotal in the e-commerce domain, offering innovative solutions and enhancing customer experiences. This work presents a comprehensive survey on the applications and challenges of LLMs in e-commerce. The paper begins by introducing the key principles underlying the use of LLMs in e-commerce, detailing the processes of pretraining, fine-tuning, and prompting that tailor these models to specific needs. It then explores the varied applications of LLMs in e-commerce, including product reviews, where they synthesize and analyze customer feedback; product recommendations, where they leverage consumer data to suggest relevant items; product information translation, enhancing global accessibility; and product question and answer sections, where they automate customer support. The paper critically addresses the fairness challenges in e-commerce, highlighting how biases in training data and algorithms can lead to unfair outcomes, such as reinforcing stereotypes or discriminating against certain groups. These issues not only undermine consumer trust, but also raise ethical and legal concerns. Finally, the work outlines future research directions, emphasizing the need for more equitable and transparent LLMs in e-commerce. It advocates for ongoing efforts to mitigate biases and improve the fairness of these systems, ensuring they serve diverse global markets effectively and ethically. Through this comprehensive analysis, the survey provides a holistic view of the current landscape of LLMs in e-commerce, offering insights into their potential and limitations, and guiding future endeavors in creating fairer and more inclusive e-commerce environments.
6/26/2024