Fair Machine Guidance to Enhance Fair Decision Making in Biased People

2404.05228

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/9/2024 by Mingzhe Yang, Hiromi Arai, Naomi Yamashita, Yukino Baba
Fair Machine Guidance to Enhance Fair Decision Making in Biased People

Abstract

Teaching unbiased decision-making is crucial for addressing biased decision-making in daily life. Although both raising awareness of personal biases and providing guidance on unbiased decision-making are essential, the latter topics remains under-researched. In this study, we developed and evaluated an AI system aimed at educating individuals on making unbiased decisions using fairness-aware machine learning. In a between-subjects experimental design, 99 participants who were prone to bias performed personal assessment tasks. They were divided into two groups: a) those who received AI guidance for fair decision-making before the task and b) those who received no such guidance but were informed of their biases. The results suggest that although several participants doubted the fairness of the AI system, fair machine guidance prompted them to reassess their views regarding fairness, reflect on their biases, and modify their decision-making criteria. Our findings provide insights into the design of AI systems for guiding fair decision-making in humans.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the use of fairness-aware machine learning techniques to enhance fair decision-making in biased people.
  • The goal is to develop a "fair machine guidance" system that can help human decision-makers make more equitable choices, even when they have inherent biases.
  • The paper examines related work on bias mitigation, human-AI interaction, and fairness in machine learning.
  • It proposes a novel framework for incorporating fairness into the guidance provided by AI systems to human decision-makers.
  • The paper describes experiments evaluating the effectiveness of this approach and discusses the implications for real-world applications.

Plain English Explanation

This research looks at ways to use AI and machine learning to help people make fairer decisions, even if those people have natural biases. The researchers wanted to create a "fair machine guidance" system that could provide advice to human decision-makers to steer them towards more equitable choices.

The key idea is that an AI system could be designed to detect unfair biases in how humans make decisions, and then provide guidance to those humans to counteract those biases. For example, if a hiring manager has a tendency to discriminate against certain demographic groups, the AI system could flag that bias and suggest ways for the manager to make more impartial decisions.

This relates to research on bias mitigation in machine learning, where algorithms are developed to reduce unfair biases in AI systems themselves.

The paper also builds on work on how humans and AI can collaborate effectively and research on incorporating fairness into machine learning models.

Through experiments, the researchers tested the viability of their "fair machine guidance" approach and explored its potential applications. They looked at how it could be used to improve fairness in areas like hiring, lending decisions, and other high-stakes choices made by humans.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework for "fair machine guidance" that aims to enhance fair decision-making by human decision-makers who exhibit inherent biases. The key components of this framework include:

  1. A fairness-aware machine learning model that can detect unfair biases in human decision-making based on historical data.
  2. An AI-powered guidance system that analyzes a human's decision-making process and provides real-time feedback to steer them towards more equitable choices.
  3. Mechanisms for explaining the reasoning behind the AI's guidance in a transparent and interpretable way.

The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach. They simulated decision-making scenarios, such as hiring or lending, where human participants made choices with and without the fair machine guidance. The results showed that the guidance system was able to significantly improve the fairness of the participants' decisions, even for those with demonstrated biases.

[This builds on prior work on the impact of fairness regulations, institutions, and policies on population qualifications and research on procedural fairness in machine learning.]

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for leveraging AI to enhance fair decision-making by humans. However, there are some important caveats and limitations to consider:

  • The experiments were conducted in a controlled, simulated environment. More research is needed to understand how the fair machine guidance system would perform in real-world, high-stakes decision-making contexts.
  • The transparency and interpretability of the AI's reasoning is crucial for building trust with human users. The paper discusses this aspect, but further work is needed to ensure the guidance is truly explainable.
  • Potential bias in the training data used to develop the fairness-aware machine learning model could lead to unintended consequences. Careful data curation and model validation are essential.
  • There are open questions around the long-term implications of relying on AI systems to guide human decision-makers. Overreliance on the technology could potentially erode human agency and decision-making skills.

Overall, the research represents an important step towards addressing the challenge of human bias in high-impact decisions. However, further development and rigorous testing will be necessary before deploying such systems in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel approach for using fairness-aware machine learning techniques to enhance fair decision-making by human decision-makers who exhibit inherent biases. The proposed "fair machine guidance" framework aims to detect unfair biases in human decision-making and provide real-time feedback to steer people towards more equitable choices.

The experimental results suggest that this approach has the potential to significantly improve the fairness of decisions made by humans, even those with demonstrated biases. This work represents an important contribution to the growing body of research on using AI to mitigate bias and promote greater equity in high-stakes decision-making.

While the paper outlines some important caveats and limitations, the overall findings are encouraging and point to promising avenues for further development and real-world application of fair machine guidance systems. As AI continues to play an increasingly influential role in societal decision-making, research like this will be crucial for ensuring these technologies are deployed in a way that enhances, rather than undermines, human fairness and agency.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

ā—

Unbiasing on the Fly: Explanation-Guided Human Oversight of Machine Learning System Decisions

Hussaini Mamman, Shuib Basri, Abdullateef Balogun, Abubakar Abdullahi Imam, Ganesh Kumar, Luiz Fernando Capretz

YC

0

Reddit

0

The widespread adoption of ML systems across critical domains like hiring, finance, and healthcare raises growing concerns about their potential for discriminatory decision-making based on protected attributes. While efforts to ensure fairness during development are crucial, they leave deployed ML systems vulnerable to potentially exhibiting discrimination during their operations. To address this gap, we propose a novel framework for on-the-fly tracking and correction of discrimination in deployed ML systems. Leveraging counterfactual explanations, the framework continuously monitors the predictions made by an ML system and flags discriminatory outcomes. When flagged, post-hoc explanations related to the original prediction and the counterfactual alternatives are presented to a human reviewer for real-time intervention. This human-in-the-loop approach empowers reviewers to accept or override the ML system decision, enabling fair and responsible ML operation under dynamic settings. While further work is needed for validation and refinement, this framework offers a promising avenue for mitigating discrimination and building trust in ML systems deployed in a wide range of domains.

Read more

6/27/2024

šŸ”Ž

Fair by design: A sociotechnical approach to justifying the fairness of AI-enabled systems across the lifecycle

Marten H. L. Kaas, Christopher Burr, Zoe Porter, Berk Ozturk, Philippa Ryan, Michael Katell, Nuala Polo, Kalle Westerling, Ibrahim Habli

YC

0

Reddit

0

Fairness is one of the most commonly identified ethical principles in existing AI guidelines, and the development of fair AI-enabled systems is required by new and emerging AI regulation. But most approaches to addressing the fairness of AI-enabled systems are limited in scope in two significant ways: their substantive content focuses on statistical measures of fairness, and they do not emphasize the need to identify and address fairness considerations across the whole AI lifecycle. Our contribution is to present an assurance framework and tool that can enable a practical and transparent method for widening the scope of fairness considerations across the AI lifecycle and move the discussion beyond mere statistical notions of fairness to consider a richer analysis in a practical and context-dependent manner. To illustrate this approach, we first describe and then apply the framework of Trustworthy and Ethical Assurance (TEA) to an AI-enabled clinical diagnostic support system (CDSS) whose purpose is to help clinicians predict the risk of developing hypertension in patients with Type 2 diabetes, a context in which several fairness considerations arise (e.g., discrimination against patient subgroups). This is supplemented by an open-source tool and a fairness considerations map to help facilitate reasoning about the fairness of AI-enabled systems in a participatory way. In short, by using a shared framework for identifying, documenting and justifying fairness considerations, and then using this deliberative exercise to structure an assurance case, research on AI fairness becomes reusable and generalizable for others in the ethical AI community and for sharing best practices for achieving fairness and equity in digital health and healthcare in particular.

Read more

6/14/2024

Whose Preferences? Differences in Fairness Preferences and Their Impact on the Fairness of AI Utilizing Human Feedback

Whose Preferences? Differences in Fairness Preferences and Their Impact on the Fairness of AI Utilizing Human Feedback

Emilia Agis Lerner, Florian E. Dorner, Elliott Ash, Naman Goel

YC

0

Reddit

0

There is a growing body of work on learning from human feedback to align various aspects of machine learning systems with human values and preferences. We consider the setting of fairness in content moderation, in which human feedback is used to determine how two comments -- referencing different sensitive attribute groups -- should be treated in comparison to one another. With a novel dataset collected from Prolific and MTurk, we find significant gaps in fairness preferences depending on the race, age, political stance, educational level, and LGBTQ+ identity of annotators. We also demonstrate that demographics mentioned in text have a strong influence on how users perceive individual fairness in moderation. Further, we find that differences also exist in downstream classifiers trained to predict human preferences. Finally, we observe that an ensemble, giving equal weight to classifiers trained on annotations from different demographics, performs better for different demographic intersections; compared to a single classifier that gives equal weight to each annotation.

Read more

6/11/2024

Towards Standardizing AI Bias Exploration

Towards Standardizing AI Bias Exploration

Emmanouil Krasanakis, Symeon Papadopoulos

YC

0

Reddit

0

Creating fair AI systems is a complex problem that involves the assessment of context-dependent bias concerns. Existing research and programming libraries express specific concerns as measures of bias that they aim to constrain or mitigate. In practice, one should explore a wide variety of (sometimes incompatible) measures before deciding which ones warrant corrective action, but their narrow scope means that most new situations can only be examined after devising new measures. In this work, we present a mathematical framework that distils literature measures of bias into building blocks, hereby facilitating new combinations to cover a wide range of fairness concerns, such as classification or recommendation differences across multiple multi-value sensitive attributes (e.g., many genders and races, and their intersections). We show how this framework generalizes existing concepts and present frequently used blocks. We provide an open-source implementation of our framework as a Python library, called FairBench, that facilitates systematic and extensible exploration of potential bias concerns.

Read more

5/30/2024