Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Overview

• Companies are increasingly using algorithmic technology to make hiring decisions throughout the recruitment process.
• Ensuring algorithmic fairness is crucial in this domain due to its high stakes and structural inequalities.
• However, existing research on this topic often takes a limited perspective, either optimistically focusing on replacing biased human decisions or pessimistically pointing to the automation of discrimination.
• Whether and how algorithmic hiring can be less biased and more beneficial to society than current low-tech alternatives remains an open question, which is detrimental to building trust in these systems.

Plain English Explanation

This paper discusses the growing use of algorithmic technology in the hiring process, and the importance of ensuring these algorithms are fair and unbiased. Many companies are using automated systems to help make hiring decisions, from screening resumes to conducting interviews. This is concerning because these algorithms could potentially perpetuate or even amplify existing biases and inequalities in the hiring process.

The research in this area often takes a limited view, either being overly optimistic about algorithms replacing biased human decisions, or overly pessimistic and simply pointing out how algorithms can automate discrimination. The reality is more complex. Whether and how algorithmic hiring can be less biased and more beneficial to society than current manual hiring methods is still an open question. This uncertainty makes it difficult for people to trust these algorithmic hiring systems.

The paper aims to provide a balanced and comprehensive overview of the systems, biases, measurements, mitigation strategies, datasets, and legal aspects of algorithmic hiring and fairness. This multidisciplinary approach is intended to help both practitioners and researchers better understand the current state of this technology, its limitations, and how it can be improved to benefit all stakeholders.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a multidisciplinary survey on the use of algorithmic technology in hiring and the challenge of ensuring fairness in this domain. The authors highlight that most existing work in this area takes a limited perspective, either focusing on the potential for algorithms to replace biased human decision-making or on the ways algorithms can automate discrimination.

To address this gap, the paper provides a balanced and integrated coverage of the various aspects of algorithmic hiring and fairness. This includes an examination of the hiring systems themselves, the types of biases that can arise, the measures used to assess fairness, strategies for mitigating bias, the datasets used to train these systems, and the legal considerations around algorithmic hiring.

The authors argue that a more contextualized understanding and governance of this technology is needed to ensure shared benefits for all stakeholders. They identify current opportunities and limitations in the field and provide recommendations for future work to make algorithmic hiring less biased and more beneficial to society than existing low-tech alternatives.

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights an important issue in the growing use of algorithmic technology for hiring decisions. The authors are correct that much of the existing research on this topic tends to take a polarized view, either overly optimistic or overly pessimistic. A more balanced and nuanced understanding of the challenges and potential of algorithmic hiring is necessary.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into specific algorithmic techniques or case studies. While the broad overview is valuable, more detailed analysis of how different algorithmic approaches impact fairness in hiring would strengthen the research. Additionally, the paper does not address the role of human oversight and decision-making in the hiring process, which is an important consideration when evaluating the fairness of these hybrid human-algorithm systems.

[Further research is needed to develop more robust frameworks for assessing fairness and incorporating stakeholder preferences into the design of algorithmic hiring systems. Ongoing monitoring and adjustment of these systems will also be crucial to ensuring they remain fair and beneficial over time.

Conclusion

This paper provides a much-needed multidisciplinary survey of the complex issue of algorithmic fairness in hiring. By highlighting the current limitations of research in this area and the need for a more balanced and contextualized understanding, the authors have laid the groundwork for further exploration and improvement of algorithmic hiring practices. Addressing the challenges of ensuring fairness in this high-stakes domain is crucial for building trust in these emerging technologies and ensuring they benefit all members of society.