FairGT: A Fairness-aware Graph Transformer

Read original: arXiv:2404.17169 - Published 4/29/2024 by Renqiang Luo, Huafei Huang, Shuo Yu, Xiuzhen Zhang, Feng Xia
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes FairGT, a fairness-aware Graph Transformer model that aims to mitigate bias and unfairness in graph-based machine learning tasks.
  • Existing Graph Transformer models often neglect fairness considerations, leading to biased outcomes against certain sensitive subgroups.
  • FairGT incorporates novel fairness-aware techniques, including a structural feature selection strategy and a multi-hop node feature integration method, to ensure independence from sensitive features and improve fairness.
  • Empirical evaluations demonstrate FairGT's superior performance in fairness metrics compared to existing graph-based models and state-of-the-art fairness-aware approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Graph-based machine learning models, such as Graph Transformers, have become increasingly popular for tasks like social network analysis and recommendation systems. However, these models often fail to consider fairness, leading to biased outcomes that unfairly disadvantage certain groups.

To address this issue, the researchers developed FairGT, a new Graph Transformer model that explicitly incorporates fairness considerations. FairGT uses a clever strategy to select the most important structural features of the graph while ensuring that these features are independent of sensitive attributes, such as race or gender. It also employs a multi-hop approach to integrate node features, which further enhances the model's fairness.

By incorporating these fairness-aware techniques, FairGT is able to mitigate the biases that often arise in traditional Graph Transformer models. The researchers tested FairGT on several real-world datasets and found that it outperformed other graph-based models and state-of-the-art fairness-aware approaches in terms of fairness metrics.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation of the FairGT model is its incorporation of fairness-aware techniques into the Graph Transformer framework. Conventional Graph Transformer models encode graph information without relying on message-passing mechanisms, which means that traditional fairness-aware graph learning methods cannot be directly applied to address fairness concerns.

To tackle this challenge, the researchers introduced two novel components in FairGT:

  1. Structural Feature Selection: FairGT employs a meticulous feature selection strategy to identify the most important structural features of the graph, while ensuring that these features are independent of sensitive attributes. This is achieved by selecting the eigenvectors of the adjacency matrix that have the highest eigenvalues, as these capture the most significant topological information.

  2. Multi-Hop Node Feature Integration: FairGT uses a multi-hop approach to integrate node features, allowing the model to capture higher-order relationships and dependencies. This helps to further bolster fairness considerations by considering a broader context beyond just direct neighbors.

These fairness-aware graph information encodings are then seamlessly integrated into the Transformer framework, enabling the model to perform downstream tasks while maintaining a strong focus on fairness.

The researchers also provide theoretical proofs demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed fair structural topology encoding and multi-hop integration methods in ensuring fairness.

Critical Analysis

The FairGT paper presents a promising approach to addressing fairness issues in graph-based machine learning models. By explicitly incorporating fairness-aware techniques, the researchers have made an important contribution to the field of fair graph neural networks and fair representations.

However, the paper also highlights some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Real-world Applicability: While the empirical evaluations demonstrate FairGT's superiority in fairness metrics, the researchers note that the model's performance may be influenced by the specific dataset characteristics and the choice of fairness metrics. Further research is needed to assess the model's robustness and generalizability to a wider range of real-world scenarios.

  2. Interpretability and Explainability: The paper does not provide much insight into the interpretability of the FairGT model's decisions or the underlying reasons for its fairness improvements. Incorporating interpretability and explainability could enhance the model's trustworthiness and facilitate better understanding of the fairness mechanisms.

  3. Intersectional Fairness: The paper primarily focuses on single-attribute fairness, such as fairness with respect to a specific sensitive feature. Exploring intersectional fairness, which considers the complex interplay of multiple sensitive attributes, could further improve the model's ability to address real-world fairness challenges.

Overall, the FairGT paper represents a significant step forward in the quest for fair graph-based learning, and the proposed techniques could inspire future research in this important direction.

Conclusion

The FairGT paper introduces a novel fairness-aware Graph Transformer model that aims to mitigate bias and unfairness in graph-based machine learning tasks. By incorporating a meticulous structural feature selection strategy and a multi-hop node feature integration method, FairGT is able to ensure independence from sensitive features and improve fairness considerations within the Transformer framework.

The empirical evaluations demonstrate FairGT's superior performance in fairness metrics compared to existing graph-based models and state-of-the-art fairness-aware approaches, highlighting the potential of this approach to address the critical issue of fairness in graph-based machine learning. As the application of graph-based models continues to expand, the insights and techniques presented in this paper could have significant implications for building more equitable and inclusive AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

FairGT: A Fairness-aware Graph Transformer

Renqiang Luo, Huafei Huang, Shuo Yu, Xiuzhen Zhang, Feng Xia

The design of Graph Transformers (GTs) generally neglects considerations for fairness, resulting in biased outcomes against certain sensitive subgroups. Since GTs encode graph information without relying on message-passing mechanisms, conventional fairness-aware graph learning methods cannot be directly applicable to address these issues. To tackle this challenge, we propose FairGT, a Fairness-aware Graph Transformer explicitly crafted to mitigate fairness concerns inherent in GTs. FairGT incorporates a meticulous structural feature selection strategy and a multi-hop node feature integration method, ensuring independence of sensitive features and bolstering fairness considerations. These fairness-aware graph information encodings seamlessly integrate into the Transformer framework for downstream tasks. We also prove that the proposed fair structural topology encoding with adjacency matrix eigenvector selection and multi-hop integration are theoretically effective. Empirical evaluations conducted across five real-world datasets demonstrate FairGT's superiority in fairness metrics over existing graph transformers, graph neural networks, and state-of-the-art fairness-aware graph learning approaches.

Read more

4/29/2024

Hypergraph Transformer for Semi-Supervised Classification
Total Score

0

Hypergraph Transformer for Semi-Supervised Classification

Zexi Liu, Bohan Tang, Ziyuan Ye, Xiaowen Dong, Siheng Chen, Yanfeng Wang

Hypergraphs play a pivotal role in the modelling of data featuring higher-order relations involving more than two entities. Hypergraph neural networks emerge as a powerful tool for processing hypergraph-structured data, delivering remarkable performance across various tasks, e.g., hypergraph node classification. However, these models struggle to capture global structural information due to their reliance on local message passing. To address this challenge, we propose a novel hypergraph learning framework, HyperGraph Transformer (HyperGT). HyperGT uses a Transformer-based neural network architecture to effectively consider global correlations among all nodes and hyperedges. To incorporate local structural information, HyperGT has two distinct designs: i) a positional encoding based on the hypergraph incidence matrix, offering valuable insights into node-node and hyperedge-hyperedge interactions; and ii) a hypergraph structure regularization in the loss function, capturing connectivities between nodes and hyperedges. Through these designs, HyperGT achieves comprehensive hypergraph representation learning by effectively incorporating global interactions while preserving local connectivity patterns. Extensive experiments conducted on real-world hypergraph node classification tasks showcase that HyperGT consistently outperforms existing methods, establishing new state-of-the-art benchmarks. Ablation studies affirm the effectiveness of the individual designs of our model.

Read more

6/4/2024

FUGNN: Harmonizing Fairness and Utility in Graph Neural Networks
Total Score

0

FUGNN: Harmonizing Fairness and Utility in Graph Neural Networks

Renqiang Luo, Huafei Huang, Shuo Yu, Zhuoyang Han, Estrid He, Xiuzhen Zhang, Feng Xia

Fairness-aware Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) often face a challenging trade-off, where prioritizing fairness may require compromising utility. In this work, we re-examine fairness through the lens of spectral graph theory, aiming to reconcile fairness and utility within the framework of spectral graph learning. We explore the correlation between sensitive features and spectrum in GNNs, using theoretical analysis to delineate the similarity between original sensitive features and those after convolution under different spectra. Our analysis reveals a reduction in the impact of similarity when the eigenvectors associated with the largest magnitude eigenvalue exhibit directional similarity. Based on these theoretical insights, we propose FUGNN, a novel spectral graph learning approach that harmonizes the conflict between fairness and utility. FUGNN ensures algorithmic fairness and utility by truncating the spectrum and optimizing eigenvector distribution during the encoding process. The fairness-aware eigenvector selection reduces the impact of convolution on sensitive features while concurrently minimizing the sacrifice of utility. FUGNN further optimizes the distribution of eigenvectors through a transformer architecture. By incorporating the optimized spectrum into the graph convolution network, FUGNN effectively learns node representations. Experiments on six real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of FUGNN over baseline methods. The codes are available at https://github.com/yushuowiki/FUGNN.

Read more

8/14/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Bridging the Fairness Divide: Achieving Group and Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks

Duna Zhan, Dongliang Guo, Pengsheng Ji, Sheng Li

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing and learning from complex data structured as graphs, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in various applications, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and drug discovery. However, despite their impressive performance, the fairness problem has increasingly gained attention as a crucial aspect to consider. Existing research in graph learning focuses on either group fairness or individual fairness. However, since each concept provides unique insights into fairness from distinct perspectives, integrating them into a fair graph neural network system is crucial. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet to comprehensively tackle both individual and group fairness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a new concept of individual fairness within groups and a novel framework named Fairness for Group and Individual (FairGI), which considers both group fairness and individual fairness within groups in the context of graph learning. FairGI employs the similarity matrix of individuals to achieve individual fairness within groups, while leveraging adversarial learning to address group fairness in terms of both Equal Opportunity and Statistical Parity. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of group fairness and individual fairness within groups, but also exhibits excellent performance in population-level individual fairness, while maintaining comparable prediction accuracy.

Read more

4/29/2024