Fairness in Large Language Models in Three Hour

Read original: arXiv:2408.00992 - Published 8/6/2024 by Thang Doan Viet, Zichong Wang, Minh Nhat Nguyen, Wenbin Zhang
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a tutorial on fairness in large language models (LLMs) that can be completed in three hours.
  • It covers key concepts, practical methods, and research perspectives on fairness in LLMs.
  • The goal is to help researchers and practitioners better understand and address fairness issues in LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, these models can also reflect and amplify societal biases, leading to unfair or discriminatory outputs.

The tutorial outline covers the fundamentals of fairness in LLMs, including definitions of fairness, measuring bias, and practical methods for improving fairness. It also explores research perspectives on the challenges and limitations of fair LLMs.

The goal is to help researchers, developers, and anyone interested in AI better understand the fairness issues surrounding LLMs. By covering the key concepts and practical approaches, the tutorial aims to equip people with the knowledge to identify and mitigate unfairness in these powerful language models.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines a tutorial that covers four main topics related to fairness in large language models (LLMs):

  1. Definitions of Fairness: This section explores different mathematical and conceptual definitions of fairness, such as demographic parity, equal opportunity, and causal fairness.

  2. Measuring Bias: The tutorial discusses various techniques for measuring bias in LLM outputs, including word embedding association tests, text generation evaluations, and probing classifiers.

  3. Practical Methods: This part covers real-world approaches for improving fairness in LLMs, such as data augmentation, adversarial training, and calibrated data selection.

  4. Research Perspectives: The final section explores open challenges and limitations in achieving fairness in LLMs, including the difficulty of defining and evaluating fairness, the trade-offs between fairness and other desirable model properties, and the inherent biases present in training data.

By covering these key aspects, the tutorial aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of fairness issues in LLMs and equip researchers and practitioners with the knowledge and tools to address these challenges.

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights the importance of fairness in large language models, which are increasingly being deployed in high-stakes applications. It acknowledges the complexities and trade-offs involved in achieving fairness, such as the difficulty of defining and measuring fairness, and the potential tension between fairness and other model properties like performance.

While the tutorial provides a solid overview of the topic, it does not delve deeply into the specific techniques and their limitations. The practical methods section, for example, could benefit from more detailed explanations and discussions of the strengths, weaknesses, and real-world implications of each approach.

Additionally, the research perspectives section could be expanded to explore more of the open challenges and potential avenues for future research. For example, the paper could discuss the difficulty of mitigating intersectional biases or the need for more holistic approaches to fairness that consider the broader societal context.

Overall, this tutorial serves as a valuable introduction to the topic of fairness in large language models, but further research and in-depth discussions would be needed to fully address the nuanced and evolving challenges in this field.

Conclusion

This paper presents a tutorial on fairness in large language models (LLMs) that can be completed in three hours. It covers key concepts, practical methods, and research perspectives to help researchers and practitioners better understand and address fairness issues in these powerful AI systems.

The tutorial outlines definitions of fairness, techniques for measuring bias, practical approaches for improving fairness, and the challenges and limitations in achieving fair LLMs. By providing this comprehensive overview, the paper aims to equip people with the knowledge and tools to identify and mitigate unfairness in large language models, which are increasingly being deployed in high-stakes applications.

While the paper offers a solid introduction to the topic, further research and in-depth discussions would be needed to fully address the nuanced and evolving challenges in this field. Nonetheless, this tutorial serves as a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding and improving fairness in large language models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Fairness in Large Language Models in Three Hour

Thang Doan Viet, Zichong Wang, Minh Nhat Nguyen, Wenbin Zhang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains but often lack fairness considerations, potentially leading to discriminatory outcomes against marginalized populations. Unlike fairness in traditional machine learning, fairness in LLMs involves unique backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. This tutorial provides a systematic overview of recent advances in the literature concerning fair LLMs, beginning with real-world case studies to introduce LLMs, followed by an analysis of bias causes therein. The concept of fairness in LLMs is then explored, summarizing the strategies for evaluating bias and the algorithms designed to promote fairness. Additionally, resources for assessing bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are compiled, and current research challenges and open questions in the field are discussed. The repository is available at url{https://github.com/LavinWong/Fairness-in-Large-Language-Models}.

Read more

8/6/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey

Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.

Read more

4/3/2024

Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained
Total Score

0

Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained

Thang Viet Doan, Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang

Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite these advancements, LMs can inherit and amplify societal biases related to sensitive attributes such as gender and race, limiting their adoption in real-world applications. Therefore, fairness has been extensively explored in LMs, leading to the proposal of various fairness notions. However, the lack of clear agreement on which fairness definition to apply in specific contexts (textit{e.g.,} medium-sized LMs versus large-sized LMs) and the complexity of understanding the distinctions between these definitions can create confusion and impede further progress. To this end, this paper proposes a systematic survey that clarifies the definitions of fairness as they apply to LMs. Specifically, we begin with a brief introduction to LMs and fairness in LMs, followed by a comprehensive, up-to-date overview of existing fairness notions in LMs and the introduction of a novel taxonomy that categorizes these concepts based on their foundational principles and operational distinctions. We further illustrate each definition through experiments, showcasing their practical implications and outcomes. Finally, we discuss current research challenges and open questions, aiming to foster innovative ideas and advance the field. The implementation and additional resources are publicly available at https://github.com/LavinWong/Fairness-in-Large-Language-Models/tree/main/definitions.

Read more

7/29/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey

Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed

Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.

Read more

7/16/2024