FairQuant: Certifying and Quantifying Fairness of Deep Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2409.03220 - Published 9/6/2024 by Brian Hyeongseok Kim, Jingbo Wang, Chao Wang

🤿

Overview

The paper proposes a method called FairQuant for certifying and quantifying the fairness of deep neural networks.
FairQuant aims to address concerns about fairness and bias in AI systems by providing a way to evaluate and measure the fairness of deep learning models.
The method uses formal verification techniques to certify the fairness of a model and provides quantitative metrics to measure the degree of fairness.

Plain English Explanation

FairQuant: Certifying and Quantifying Fairness of Deep Neural Networks is a research paper that presents a new approach for evaluating the fairness of deep learning models. Deep learning models are powerful AI systems that can learn complex patterns from data, but they can also inadvertently learn and perpetuate biases present in the training data.

The researchers behind FairQuant recognized the importance of ensuring these AI systems are fair and unbiased, especially when they are used for high-stakes decisions that can impact people's lives. FairQuant uses formal verification techniques to rigorously analyze deep learning models and certify that they meet certain fairness criteria. It also provides quantitative metrics to measure the degree of fairness, allowing developers to understand and improve the fairness of their models.

By making fairness a key consideration in the development of deep learning models, the FairQuant approach can help ensure these powerful AI systems are used in a way that is equitable and inclusive, rather than perpetuating unfair biases.

Technical Explanation

FairQuant is a method for certifying and quantifying the fairness of deep neural networks. The researchers developed this approach to address the growing concern about fairness and bias in AI systems.

The core idea behind FairQuant is to use formal verification techniques to analyze deep learning models and determine whether they meet certain fairness criteria. These formal verification methods allow the researchers to mathematically prove properties about the model's behavior, such as whether it treats individuals fairly regardless of sensitive attributes like race or gender.

In addition to this certification process, FairQuant also provides quantitative metrics to measure the degree of fairness exhibited by a deep learning model. These metrics can help developers understand the fairness characteristics of their models and guide them in improving the fairness during the training process.

The researchers evaluated FairQuant on several datasets and deep learning models, demonstrating its ability to effectively certify and quantify fairness. They showed that FairQuant can identify fairness issues in models and provide insights to help improve the fairness of the AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The FairQuant approach represents an important step forward in ensuring the fairness of deep learning models. By providing a formal, rigorous way to evaluate fairness, it addresses a significant challenge in the development of AI systems.

However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations of the FairQuant method. For example, the fairness criteria it uses may not capture all aspects of fairness, and the quantitative metrics may not fully reflect the nuances of fairness in real-world applications.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the FairQuant approach, which could be a practical concern when dealing with large, complex deep learning models.

Further research could explore ways to expand the fairness properties that FairQuant can analyze, as well as investigate more efficient algorithms to make the approach scalable for industry-scale deep learning models.

Conclusion

The FairQuant paper presents a significant contribution to the field of AI fairness by providing a formal method for certifying and quantifying the fairness of deep learning models. By addressing the growing concerns about bias and unfairness in AI systems, FairQuant has the potential to help ensure that these powerful technologies are developed and deployed in a way that is equitable and inclusive.

While the approach has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to build AI systems that are fair and trustworthy. As the field of AI continues to evolve, methods like FairQuant will likely play a crucial role in shaping the development of responsible and ethical AI technologies.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

FairQuant: Certifying and Quantifying Fairness of Deep Neural Networks

Brian Hyeongseok Kim, Jingbo Wang, Chao Wang

We propose a method for formally certifying and quantifying individual fairness of deep neural networks (DNN). Individual fairness guarantees that any two individuals who are identical except for a legally protected attribute (e.g., gender or race) receive the same treatment. While there are existing techniques that provide such a guarantee, they tend to suffer from lack of scalability or accuracy as the size and input dimension of the DNN increase. Our method overcomes this limitation by applying abstraction to a symbolic interval based analysis of the DNN followed by iterative refinement guided by the fairness property. Furthermore, our method lifts the symbolic interval based analysis from conventional qualitative certification to quantitative certification, by computing the percentage of individuals whose classification outputs are provably fair, instead of merely deciding if the DNN is fair. We have implemented our method and evaluated it on deep neural networks trained on four popular fairness research datasets. The experimental results show that our method is not only more accurate than state-of-the-art techniques but also several orders-of-magnitude faster.

9/6/2024

FairProof : Confidential and Certifiable Fairness for Neural Networks

Chhavi Yadav, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Dan Boneh, Kamalika Chaudhuri

Machine learning models are increasingly used in societal applications, yet legal and privacy concerns demand that they very often be kept confidential. Consequently, there is a growing distrust about the fairness properties of these models in the minds of consumers, who are often at the receiving end of model predictions. To this end, we propose name -- a system that uses Zero-Knowledge Proofs (a cryptographic primitive) to publicly verify the fairness of a model, while maintaining confidentiality. We also propose a fairness certification algorithm for fully-connected neural networks which is befitting to ZKPs and is used in this system. We implement name in Gnark and demonstrate empirically that our system is practically feasible. Code is available at https://github.com/infinite-pursuits/FairProof.

7/17/2024

NeuFair: Neural Network Fairness Repair with Dropout

Vishnu Asutosh Dasu, Ashish Kumar, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari, Gang Tan

This paper investigates neuron dropout as a post-processing bias mitigation for deep neural networks (DNNs). Neural-driven software solutions are increasingly applied in socially critical domains with significant fairness implications. While neural networks are exceptionally good at finding statistical patterns from data, they may encode and amplify existing biases from the historical data. Existing bias mitigation algorithms often require modifying the input dataset or the learning algorithms. We posit that the prevalent dropout methods that prevent over-fitting during training by randomly dropping neurons may be an effective and less intrusive approach to improve the fairness of pre-trained DNNs. However, finding the ideal set of neurons to drop is a combinatorial problem. We propose NeuFair, a family of post-processing randomized algorithms that mitigate unfairness in pre-trained DNNs via dropouts during inference after training. Our randomized search is guided by an objective to minimize discrimination while maintaining the model's utility. We show that our design of randomized algorithms is effective and efficient in improving fairness (up to 69%) with minimal or no model performance degradation. We provide intuitive explanations of these phenomena and carefully examine the influence of various hyperparameters of search algorithms on the results. Finally, we empirically and conceptually compare NeuFair to different state-of-the-art bias mitigators.

9/4/2024

Implementing Fairness: the view from a FairDream

Thomas Souverain, Johnathan Nguyen, Nicolas Meric, Paul 'Egr'e

In this paper, we propose an experimental investigation of the problem of AI fairness in classification. We train an AI model and develop our own fairness package FairDream to detect inequalities and then to correct for them, using income prediction as a case study. Our experiments show that it is a property of FairDream to fulfill fairness objectives which are conditional on the ground truth (Equalized Odds), even when the algorithm is set the task of equalizing positives across groups (Demographic Parity). While this may be seen as an anomaly, we explain this property by comparing our approach with a closely related fairness method (GridSearch), which can enforce Demographic Parity at the expense of Equalized Odds. We grant that a fairness metric conditioned on true labels does not give a sufficient criterion to reach fairness, but we argue that it gives us at least a necessary condition to implement Demographic Parity cautiously. We also explain why neither Equal Calibration nor Equal Precision stand as relevant fairness criteria in classification. Addressing their limitations to warn the decision-maker for any disadvantaging rate, Equalized Odds avoids the peril of strict conservatism, while keeping away the utopia of a whole redistribution of resources through algorithms.

7/23/2024