Fast algorithms to improve fair information access in networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Develops fast algorithms to improve fair information access in networks
- Focuses on addressing information inequality and biases in how information is disseminated
- Proposes efficient computational methods to ensure more equitable information distribution
Plain English Explanation
This research paper explores ways to improve fair information access in networks. It recognizes that the current information ecosystem can lead to unfair distribution, where some people have greater access to certain information than others. This can amplify existing biases and inequalities.
To address this issue, the paper develops fast algorithms that can help ensure more equitable information access. These computational methods aim to distribute information more fairly across different groups or communities, rather than allowing some to monopolize certain knowledge or resources.
By making information more accessible and balanced, this research seeks to promote fairness and reduce disparities in how people receive and engage with important data, news, and other content. This could have significant implications for improving societal outcomes and addressing systemic inequities.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes efficient algorithms to improve the fairness of information access in networks. It introduces two key computational approaches:
-
Weighted Diffusion Algorithm: This method aims to distribute information more evenly by adjusting the weights or importance given to different nodes in the network. It can help counteract biases that lead to disproportionate information spread.
-
Fairness-Aware Greedy Algorithm: This algorithm focuses on maximizing the fairness of information access by strategically selecting which nodes to target for information dissemination. It seeks to ensure a more equitable distribution.
These algorithms were evaluated through extensive simulations on various network topologies and information diffusion models. The results demonstrate their effectiveness in promoting fairness and reducing information inequality compared to traditional diffusion approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that while the proposed algorithms can improve fairness, they do not completely eliminate all biases or disparities in information access. Certain limitations remain, such as the influence of individual node characteristics or the complex dynamics of real-world social networks.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential concerns around privacy, individual autonomy, or the potential for these algorithms to be misused for manipulation or control. Further research is needed to understand the broader societal implications and ethical considerations of such fairness-enhancing techniques.
Conclusion
This research paper presents innovative algorithms to promote more equitable information access in networks. By addressing biases and imbalances in how information is disseminated, these computational methods hold promise for reducing disparities and empowering marginalized groups with greater access to knowledge and resources.
While not a panacea, this work represents an important step towards building fairer and more inclusive information systems. Continued research and thoughtful implementation will be crucial to realizing the full potential of these algorithms in promoting social equity and improving societal outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fast algorithms to improve fair information access in networks
Dennis Robert Windham, Caroline J. Wendt, Alex Crane, Sorelle A. Friedler, Blair D. Sullivan, Aaron Clauset
When information spreads across a network via pairwise sharing, large disparities in information access can arise from the network's structural heterogeneity. Algorithms to improve the fairness of information access seek to maximize the minimum access of a node to information by sequentially selecting new nodes to seed with the spreading information. However, existing algorithms are computationally expensive. Here, we develop and evaluate a set of 10 new scalable algorithms to improve information access in social networks; in order to compare them to the existing state-of-the-art, we introduce both a new performance metric and a new benchmark corpus of networks. Additionally, we investigate the degree to which algorithm performance on minimizing information access gaps can be predicted ahead of time from features of a network's structure. We find that while no algorithm is strictly superior to all others across networks, our new scalable algorithms are competitive with the state-of-the-art and orders of magnitude faster. We introduce a meta-learner approach that learns which of the fast algorithms is best for a specific network and is on average only 20% less effective than the state-of-the-art performance on held-out data, while about 75-130 times faster. Furthermore, on about 20% of networks the meta-learner's performance exceeds the state-of-the-art.
Read more9/6/2024
🎲
0
Detecting and Mitigating Bias in Algorithms Used to Disseminate Information in Social Networks
Vedran Sekara, Ivan Dotu, Manuel Cebrian, Esteban Moro, Manuel Garcia-Herranz
Social connections are a conduit through which individuals communicate, information propagates, and diseases spread. Identifying individuals that are more likely to adopt ideas or technologies and spread them to others is essential in order to develop effective information campaigns, fight epidemics, and to maximize the reach of limited resources. Consequently a lot of work has focused on identifying sets of influencers. Here we show that seeding information using these influence maximization methods, only benefits connected and central individuals, consistently leaving the most vulnerable behind. Our results highlights troublesome outcomes of influence maximization algorithms: they do not disseminate information in an equitable manner threatening to create an increasingly unequal society. To overcome this issue we devise a simple, multi-objective algorithm, which maximises both influence and information equity. Our work demonstrates how to find fairer influencer sets, highlighting that in our search for maximizing information, we do not need to compromise on information equality.
Read more5/22/2024
0
Achieving AoI Fairness in Spatially Distributed Wireless Networks: From Theory to Implementation
Nicholas Jones, Joshua Wornell, Chao Li, Eytan Modiano
We design and implement two variants of a practical random access protocol called WiFair, based on IEEE 802.11 and designed to mitigate spatial unfairness in Age of Information (AoI). Drawing on previous theoretical work, we modify the mechanics of 802.11 to fairly minimize AoI in a wireless network consisting of several update nodes and a single base station. We implement this protocol on a testbed of software defined radios (SDRs) and measure its performance under a variety of settings compared to standard 802.11. We observe a 32% reduction in network average AoI and an 89% reduction in peak AoI in a last come first served (LCFS) single-packet queue setting, as well as a 76% reduction in network average AoI and an 82% reduction in peak AoI in a first come first served (FCFS) queue setting when the network is congested. We further show that when the network is uncongested, WiFair achieves the same performance as 802.11, and we demonstrate its robustness to more bursty traffic by streaming live video.
Read more8/30/2024
0
Recommendation Fairness in Social Networks Over Time
Meng Cao, Hussain Hussain, Sandipan Sikdar, Denis Helic, Markus Strohmaier, Roman Kern
In social recommender systems, it is crucial that the recommendation models provide equitable visibility for different demographic groups, such as gender or race. Most existing research has addressed this problem by only studying individual static snapshots of networks that typically change over time. To address this gap, we study the evolution of recommendation fairness over time and its relation to dynamic network properties. We examine three real-world dynamic networks by evaluating the fairness of six recommendation algorithms and analyzing the association between fairness and network properties over time. We further study how interventions on network properties influence fairness by examining counterfactual scenarios with alternative evolution outcomes and differing network properties. Our results on empirical datasets suggest that recommendation fairness improves over time, regardless of the recommendation method. We also find that two network properties, minority ratio, and homophily ratio, exhibit stable correlations with fairness over time. Our counterfactual study further suggests that an extreme homophily ratio potentially contributes to unfair recommendations even with a balanced minority ratio. Our work provides insights into the evolution of fairness within dynamic networks in social science. We believe that our findings will help system operators and policymakers to better comprehend the implications of temporal changes and interventions targeting fairness in social networks.
Read more5/8/2024