Recommendation Fairness in Social Networks Over Time
2402.03450
0
0
Abstract
In social recommender systems, it is crucial that the recommendation models provide equitable visibility for different demographic groups, such as gender or race. Most existing research has addressed this problem by only studying individual static snapshots of networks that typically change over time. To address this gap, we study the evolution of recommendation fairness over time and its relation to dynamic network properties. We examine three real-world dynamic networks by evaluating the fairness of six recommendation algorithms and analyzing the association between fairness and network properties over time. We further study how interventions on network properties influence fairness by examining counterfactual scenarios with alternative evolution outcomes and differing network properties. Our results on empirical datasets suggest that recommendation fairness improves over time, regardless of the recommendation method. We also find that two network properties, minority ratio, and homophily ratio, exhibit stable correlations with fairness over time. Our counterfactual study further suggests that an extreme homophily ratio potentially contributes to unfair recommendations even with a balanced minority ratio. Our work provides insights into the evolution of fairness within dynamic networks in social science. We believe that our findings will help system operators and policymakers to better comprehend the implications of temporal changes and interventions targeting fairness in social networks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the issue of fairness in social network recommendation systems over time.
- It examines how recommendations can become biased and unfair as social networks evolve, and proposes methods to improve fairness.
- The research explores the complex interplay between network dynamics, user preferences, and algorithmic recommendations.
Plain English Explanation
In social networks, recommendation systems suggest content or connections to users based on their preferences and the behavior of their peers. However, as these networks change over time, the recommendations can become biased and unfair.
The researchers in this paper explore this issue of fairness in social network recommendations. They look at how the evolving structure of social networks and shifting user preferences can lead to some users being recommended content or connections less often than others, even if they have similar interests.
To address this, the paper proposes new algorithms and techniques to enhance the fairness of social recommendations. The goal is to ensure that recommendations are balanced and equitable, giving all users a fair chance to discover relevant content and connections over time.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the problem of recommendation fairness in dynamic social networks. It formalizes the concepts of user preferences, network structure, and recommendation algorithms, and how they interact to influence recommendation outcomes.
The researchers then design a set of experiments to evaluate different fairness-aware recommendation approaches. They simulate the evolution of social networks over time and measure how well various algorithms maintain fairness as the networks change. The key techniques explored include:
- Fairness-aware recommendation models that explicitly consider fairness objectives alongside accuracy.
- Dynamic network analysis methods to track and mitigate unfairness as networks evolve.
- Techniques to learn fairness preferences from user feedback and incorporate them into recommendation systems.
Through extensive simulations, the paper demonstrates that these fairness-enhancing approaches can significantly improve recommendation fairness over time compared to standard recommendation algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the growing field of algorithmic fairness in recommender systems. It highlights an important but understudied aspect of fairness - the dynamic nature of social networks and how that can lead to unfairness over time.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is the use of simulated data, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world social networks. Validating the proposed techniques on empirical data from deployed recommender systems would strengthen the findings.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on fairness across users, but does not explore potential fairness issues that may arise for different demographic groups or marginalized communities within the network. Further research is needed to ensure recommendations are fair and inclusive for all users.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of fairness in social network recommendations. By considering the dynamic nature of social networks, the researchers have developed new techniques to maintain fairness over time, rather than just at a single snapshot.
The findings have important implications for the design of responsible recommendation systems that can adapt to changing user preferences and network structures while ensuring equitable access to content and connections. As social networks continue to play a central role in our lives, addressing fairness in this domain is crucial for promoting digital inclusion and empowering all users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Interpolating Item and User Fairness in Multi-Sided Recommendations
Qinyi Chen, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang, Negin Golrezaei, Djallel Bouneffouf
0
0
Today's online platforms heavily lean on algorithmic recommendations for bolstering user engagement and driving revenue. However, these recommendations can impact multiple stakeholders simultaneously -- the platform, items (sellers), and users (customers) -- each with their unique objectives, making it difficult to find the right middle ground that accommodates all stakeholders. To address this, we introduce a novel fair recommendation framework, Problem (FAIR), that flexibly balances multi-stakeholder interests via a constrained optimization formulation. We next explore Problem (FAIR) in a dynamic online setting where data uncertainty further adds complexity, and propose a low-regret algorithm FORM that concurrently performs real-time learning and fair recommendations, two tasks that are often at odds. Via both theoretical analysis and a numerical case study on real-world data, we demonstrate the efficacy of our framework and method in maintaining platform revenue while ensuring desired levels of fairness for both items and users.
5/28/2024
Transparency, Privacy, and Fairness in Recommender Systems
Dominik Kowald
0
0
Recommender systems have become a pervasive part of our daily online experience, and are one of the most widely used applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Therefore, regulations and requirements for trustworthy artificial intelligence, for example, the European AI Act, which includes notions such as transparency, privacy, and fairness are also highly relevant for the design of recommender systems in practice. This habilitation elaborates on aspects related to these three notions in the light of recommender systems, namely: (i) transparency and cognitive models, (ii) privacy and limited preference information, and (iii) fairness and popularity bias in recommender systems. Specifically, with respect to aspect (i), we highlight the usefulness of incorporating psychological theories for a transparent design process of recommender systems. We term this type of systems psychology-informed recommender systems. In aspect (ii), we study and address the trade-off between accuracy and privacy in differentially-private recommendations. We design a novel recommendation approach for collaborative filtering based on an efficient neighborhood reuse concept, which reduces the number of users that need to be protected with differential privacy. Furthermore, we address the related issue of limited availability of user preference information, e.g., click data, in the settings of session-based and cold-start recommendations. With respect to aspect (iii), we analyze popularity bias in recommender systems. We find that the recommendation frequency of an item is positively correlated with this item's popularity. This also leads to the unfair treatment of users with little interest in popular content. Finally, we study long-term fairness dynamics in algorithmic decision support in the labor market using agent-based modeling techniques.
6/18/2024
BankFair: Balancing Accuracy and Fairness under Varying User Traffic in Recommender System
Xiaopeng Ye, Chen Xu, Jun Xu, Xuyang Xie, Gang Wang, Zhenhua Dong
0
0
Driven by sustainability and economic considerations, two-sided recommendation platforms are required to satisfy the needs of both users and providers. Previous studies often indicate that the two sides' needs differ in urgency: providers have relatively long-term exposure requirements, while users desire short-term, accurate services. However, our empirical study reveals that existing methods for balancing fairness and accuracy often fail to ensure both long-term fairness and short-term accuracy under fluctuating user traffic in real applications. Notably, when user traffic is low, user experience tends to decline significantly. Then, we conducted a theoretical analysis confirming that user traffic is a crucial factor in such a trade-off problem. Ensuring accuracy and fairness under variable user traffic remains a challenge. Inspired by the bankruptcy problem in economics, we propose a novel fairness-aware re-ranking approach called BankFair. BankFair intuitively uses the Talmud rule to leverage periods of high user traffic to compensate for periods of low traffic, ensuring consistent user service while maintaining long-term fairness. BankFair is composed of two modules: (1) utilizing the Talmud rule to determine the necessary degree of fairness across varying user traffic periods, and (2) implementing an online re-ranking algorithm based on the fairness degree established by the Talmud rule. Experiments on one publicly available and one real industrial dataset demonstrate that BankFair outperforms all baselines in terms of both accuracy and provider fairness.
5/28/2024
Measuring Fairness in Large-Scale Recommendation Systems with Missing Labels
Yulong Dong, Kun Jin, Xinghai Hu, Yang Liu
0
0
In large-scale recommendation systems, the vast array of items makes it infeasible to obtain accurate user preferences for each product, resulting in a common issue of missing labels. Typically, only items previously recommended to users have associated ground truth data. Although there is extensive research on fairness concerning fully observed user-item interactions, the challenge of fairness in scenarios with missing labels remains underexplored. Previous methods often treat these samples missing labels as negative, which can significantly deviate from the ground truth fairness metrics. Our study addresses this gap by proposing a novel method employing a small randomized traffic to estimate fairness metrics accurately. We present theoretical bounds for the estimation error of our fairness metric and support our findings with empirical evidence on real data. Our numerical experiments on synthetic and TikTok's real-world data validate our theory and show the efficiency and effectiveness of our novel methods. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to emphasize the necessity of random traffic in dataset collection for recommendation fairness, the first to publish a fairness-related dataset from TikTok and to provide reliable estimates of fairness metrics in the context of large-scale recommendation systems with missing labels.
6/11/2024