Fast Last-Iterate Convergence of Learning in Games Requires Forgetful Algorithms
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the convergence properties of learning algorithms in multi-agent game settings.
- The key finding is that for fast last-iterate convergence, learning algorithms need to have a "forgetful" property, meaning they don't fully retain past information.
- The authors prove theoretical results about the trade-offs between convergence speed, last-iterate convergence, and the degree of "forgetfulness" in the algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of multi-agent games, where multiple parties with different goals interact, understanding how learning algorithms converge to equilibrium solutions is crucial. This paper explores the relationship between the speed of convergence and the ability of algorithms to "forget" past information.
The researchers show that for an algorithm to converge quickly to the final solution (known as "last-iterate convergence"), it needs to have a "forgetful" property. This means the algorithm doesn't fully retain all the information it has learned in previous iterations. Instead, it tends to focus more on the current state of the game rather than dwelling on the past.
Previous work has shown that certain algorithms, like the popular "extra-gradient" method, can guarantee convergence to an equilibrium solution, but this convergence may be slow and the final solution may not be the one the algorithm ends up at. In contrast, the algorithms described in this paper can converge more quickly to the final solution, but they require this "forgetful" property to do so.
The authors provide theoretical analysis and proofs to understand the trade-offs between convergence speed, last-iterate convergence, and the degree of "forgetfulness" in the learning algorithms. This can help researchers and practitioners choose the right algorithm for their specific multi-agent game scenarios, depending on their priorities and the characteristics of the problem at hand.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the convergence properties of learning algorithms in the context of multi-agent games. The authors prove that for fast last-iterate convergence - where the algorithm quickly converges to the final solution - the learning algorithm must have a "forgetful" property, meaning it does not fully retain all past information.
Specifically, the authors consider a class of learning algorithms that can be expressed as a certain type of gradient-based update rule. They show that for this class of algorithms, there is a fundamental trade-off between the speed of convergence, the ability to converge to the last iterate (the final solution), and the degree of "forgetfulness" in the algorithm.
Previous work has shown that algorithms like extra-gradient can guarantee convergence to an equilibrium solution, but this convergence may be slow and the final solution may not be the one the algorithm ends up at. In contrast, the algorithms described in this paper can converge more quickly to the final solution, but they require this "forgetful" property to do so.
The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis, including proofs, to characterize the trade-offs between these three key properties: convergence speed, last-iterate convergence, and the degree of "forgetfulness" in the learning algorithm. This analysis can help researchers and practitioners choose the appropriate algorithm for their specific multi-agent game scenarios, based on their priorities and the characteristics of the problem at hand.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes important contributions to the understanding of learning in multi-agent games, but it also has some limitations and raises questions for further research.
One key limitation is that the analysis is restricted to a specific class of gradient-based learning algorithms. While this class is quite broad, there may be other types of learning algorithms that could exhibit different convergence properties. Further research could explore the convergence characteristics of a wider range of algorithms, including those that use different update mechanisms or explore the game dynamics in different ways.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the theoretical analysis and does not provide extensive experimental validation of the results. While the theoretical insights are valuable, it would be helpful to see how the identified trade-offs play out in practical multi-agent game scenarios, especially ones with more complex dynamics or a larger number of agents. Decentralized online learning in general-sum Stackelberg games could be an interesting area for further exploration.
Another potential area for further research is the impact of the "forgetful" property on the robustness and stability of the learned solutions. While fast last-iterate convergence is desirable, it's important to understand whether the solutions obtained through these "forgetful" algorithms are sensitive to changes in the game dynamics or other perturbations.
Overall, the paper provides valuable theoretical insights into the convergence properties of learning algorithms in multi-agent games. However, further research is needed to explore the practical implications, the generalizability of the results, and the potential trade-offs between convergence speed, last-iterate convergence, and solution robustness.
Conclusion
This paper investigates the convergence properties of learning algorithms in multi-agent game settings, with a focus on the trade-offs between convergence speed, last-iterate convergence, and the degree of "forgetfulness" in the algorithms.
The key finding is that for fast last-iterate convergence - where the algorithm quickly converges to the final solution - the learning algorithm must have a "forgetful" property, meaning it does not fully retain all past information. This contrasts with algorithms like extra-gradient, which can guarantee convergence to an equilibrium solution but may be slower and not necessarily converge to the final solution.
The theoretical analysis and proofs provided in the paper can help researchers and practitioners choose the appropriate learning algorithm for their specific multi-agent game scenarios, based on their priorities and the characteristics of the problem at hand. However, further research is needed to explore the practical implications, the generalizability of the results, and the potential trade-offs between convergence speed, last-iterate convergence, and solution robustness.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fast Last-Iterate Convergence of Learning in Games Requires Forgetful Algorithms
Yang Cai, Gabriele Farina, Julien Grand-Cl'ement, Christian Kroer, Chung-Wei Lee, Haipeng Luo, Weiqiang Zheng
Self-play via online learning is one of the premier ways to solve large-scale two-player zero-sum games, both in theory and practice. Particularly popular algorithms include optimistic multiplicative weights update (OMWU) and optimistic gradient-descent-ascent (OGDA). While both algorithms enjoy $O(1/T)$ ergodic convergence to Nash equilibrium in two-player zero-sum games, OMWU offers several advantages including logarithmic dependence on the size of the payoff matrix and $widetilde{O}(1/T)$ convergence to coarse correlated equilibria even in general-sum games. However, in terms of last-iterate convergence in two-player zero-sum games, an increasingly popular topic in this area, OGDA guarantees that the duality gap shrinks at a rate of $O(1/sqrt{T})$, while the best existing last-iterate convergence for OMWU depends on some game-dependent constant that could be arbitrarily large. This begs the question: is this potentially slow last-iterate convergence an inherent disadvantage of OMWU, or is the current analysis too loose? Somewhat surprisingly, we show that the former is true. More generally, we prove that a broad class of algorithms that do not forget the past quickly all suffer the same issue: for any arbitrarily small $delta>0$, there exists a $2times 2$ matrix game such that the algorithm admits a constant duality gap even after $1/delta$ rounds. This class of algorithms includes OMWU and other standard optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader algorithms.
Read more6/18/2024
🏷️
0
Last-Iterate Convergence of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games
Zaiwei Chen, Kaiqing Zhang, Eric Mazumdar, Asuman Ozdaglar, Adam Wierman
In this paper, we consider two-player zero-sum matrix and stochastic games and develop learning dynamics that are payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric between the two players. Specifically, the learning dynamics for matrix games are based on the smoothed best-response dynamics, while the learning dynamics for stochastic games build upon those for matrix games, with additional incorporation of the minimax value iteration. To our knowledge, our theoretical results present the first finite-sample analysis of such learning dynamics with last-iterate guarantees. In the matrix game setting, the results imply a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-1})$ to find the Nash distribution and a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-8})$ to find a Nash equilibrium. In the stochastic game setting, the results also imply a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-8})$ to find a Nash equilibrium. To establish these results, the main challenge is to handle stochastic approximation algorithms with multiple sets of coupled and stochastic iterates that evolve on (possibly) different time scales. To overcome this challenge, we developed a coupled Lyapunov-based approach, which may be of independent interest to the broader community studying the convergence behavior of stochastic approximation algorithms.
Read more9/6/2024
0
$widetilde{O}(T^{-1})$ Convergence to (Coarse) Correlated Equilibria in Full-Information General-Sum Markov Games
Weichao Mao, Haoran Qiu, Chen Wang, Hubertus Franke, Zbigniew Kalbarczyk, Tamer Bac{s}ar
No-regret learning has a long history of being closely connected to game theory. Recent works have devised uncoupled no-regret learning dynamics that, when adopted by all the players in normal-form games, converge to various equilibrium solutions at a near-optimal rate of $widetilde{O}(T^{-1})$, a significant improvement over the $O(1/sqrt{T})$ rate of classic no-regret learners. However, analogous convergence results are scarce in Markov games, a more generic setting that lays the foundation for multi-agent reinforcement learning. In this work, we close this gap by showing that the optimistic-follow-the-regularized-leader (OFTRL) algorithm, together with appropriate value update procedures, can find $widetilde{O}(T^{-1})$-approximate (coarse) correlated equilibria in full-information general-sum Markov games within $T$ iterations. Numerical results are also included to corroborate our theoretical findings.
Read more4/24/2024
0
Last-iterate Convergence Separation between Extra-gradient and Optimism in Constrained Periodic Games
Yi Feng, Ping Li, Ioannis Panageas, Xiao Wang
Last-iterate behaviors of learning algorithms in repeated two-player zero-sum games have been extensively studied due to their wide applications in machine learning and related tasks. Typical algorithms that exhibit the last-iterate convergence property include optimistic and extra-gradient methods. However, most existing results establish these properties under the assumption that the game is time-independent. Recently, (Feng et al, 2023) studied the last-iterate behaviors of optimistic and extra-gradient methods in games with a time-varying payoff matrix, and proved that in an unconstrained periodic game, extra-gradient method converges to the equilibrium while optimistic method diverges. This finding challenges the conventional wisdom that these two methods are expected to behave similarly as they do in time-independent games. However, compared to unconstrained games, games with constrains are more common both in practical and theoretical studies. In this paper, we investigate the last-iterate behaviors of optimistic and extra-gradient methods in the constrained periodic games, demonstrating that similar separation results for last-iterate convergence also hold in this setting.
Read more6/18/2024