Last-Iterate Convergence of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

Overview

• This paper explores learning dynamics for two-player zero-sum matrix and stochastic games.
• The proposed learning dynamics are payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric between the two players.
• The authors present the first finite-sample analysis of such learning dynamics with last-iterate guarantees.
• The results show sample complexity bounds for finding the Nash distribution and Nash equilibrium in matrix and stochastic games.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how two players can learn to play zero-sum games effectively. Zero-sum games are situations where one player's gain is the other player's loss, like chess or poker.

The authors develop learning algorithms that allow the players to converge to good strategies, even if they don't have full information about the game. Importantly, the learning is "payoff-based," meaning the players only need to know how much they've won or lost, not the full details of the game. And the learning is "rational" and "symmetric," meaning the players are trying to maximize their own payoffs and are treated equally.

Compared to previous work, the key contribution is a rigorous analysis of how quickly these learning algorithms converge. The authors show that for matrix games, the players can find a good approximation of the optimal strategy after seeing the game played only a relatively small number of times. For more complex stochastic games, the players can still find a good equilibrium strategy, but it requires seeing the game played many more times.

The technical analysis is quite involved, but the key ideas are: 1) Carefully modeling the learning process as a stochastic approximation algorithm with multiple, coupled update rules, and 2) Developing a new Lyapunov-based approach to prove convergence of these complex, multi-agent learning dynamics.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers two main settings: matrix games and stochastic games. In matrix games, the payoffs are fixed, while in stochastic games, the payoffs and transition dynamics can change based on the current state of the game.

For matrix games, the authors develop a learning dynamic based on smoothed best-response dynamics. This means the players update their strategies by approximately best-responding to their opponent's current strategy, with some smoothing to ensure stability.

For stochastic games, the authors build on the matrix game dynamics, but also incorporate minimax value iteration to estimate the long-term value of each state.

The key technical contribution is a finite-sample analysis of these learning dynamics, showing that they converge to Nash equilibrium strategies. Specifically:

• For matrix games, the sample complexity to find the Nash distribution is $O(1/\epsilon)$, and the sample complexity to find a Nash equilibrium is $O(1/\epsilon^8)$.
• For stochastic games, the sample complexity to find a Nash equilibrium is also $O(1/\epsilon^8)$.

To prove these results, the authors developed a new "coupled Lyapunov-based approach" to handle the complex, multi-timescale stochastic approximation algorithms involved in the learning dynamics. This technique may be useful for studying the convergence of other multi-agent learning algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes significant technical contributions, providing the first finite-sample guarantees for convergent, payoff-based learning dynamics in zero-sum games. The analysis is rigorous and the results are interesting, with the authors notably improving upon the $O(1/\epsilon^{12})$ sample complexity bounds of prior work.

However, the technical complexity of the analysis may limit the accessibility of these results to a general audience. The authors acknowledge that their techniques rely on "carefully modeling the learning process as a stochastic approximation algorithm with multiple, coupled update rules," which could be difficult for non-experts to follow.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis and does not provide any empirical evaluation of the proposed learning dynamics. While the theoretical guarantees are valuable, it would be helpful to see how the algorithms perform in practice, especially for the more complex stochastic game setting.

Finally, the authors note that their results assume the players have access to the full game payoffs, even if they don't know the opponent's strategy. Relaxing this assumption to handle more realistic, partial information settings could be an important direction for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents novel learning dynamics for two-player zero-sum games, along with a rigorous theoretical analysis of their convergence properties. The key contributions are the first finite-sample guarantees for payoff-based, convergent, and symmetric learning in both matrix and stochastic game settings.

While the technical complexity may limit the accessibility of these results, the work represents an important advance in our understanding of multi-agent learning in strategic environments. The new Lyapunov-based techniques developed by the authors could also have broader applications in the study of stochastic approximation algorithms.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how artificial agents can learn to play complex games effectively, with potential implications for areas like algorithmic game theory, reinforcement learning, and multi-agent systems.