Fast and Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification: Fundamental Limits and Low-Complexity Algorithms

Overview

• This paper considers a multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem with two goals: quickly identifying the optimal arm and maximizing rewards over a sequence of rounds.
• While these goals have been studied individually, achieving both simultaneously remains an open challenge.
• The paper introduces "Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification" (ROBAI) to address this problem.
• It presents algorithms called EOCP and variants that achieve optimal regret in Gaussian and general bandits, while also identifying the optimal arm quickly.
• The paper analyzes lower bounds on the time to identify the optimal arm and shows the proposed algorithms are optimal or near-optimal.

Plain English Explanation

The multi-armed bandit problem is a type of decision-making challenge where you have multiple "arms" (options) that each provide a random reward when pulled. The goal is to maximize the total reward you earn over a sequence of rounds by figuring out which arm is the best (i.e., has the highest average reward).

This paper looks at a version of the multi-armed bandit problem with two objectives: 1) quickly identify which arm is the best, and 2) maximize the total rewards earned throughout the process. These two goals can conflict with each other - for example, you may need to "explore" the different arms to figure out which is best, but that exploration comes at the cost of earning lower rewards in the short term.

The researchers introduce a new approach called "Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification" (ROBAI) that aims to achieve both objectives simultaneously. They present algorithms called EOCP and variants that are able to both identify the best arm quickly (in a logarithmic number of rounds) and also achieve optimal "regret" (a measure of how much reward was lost compared to always playing the best arm).

The paper also analyzes the theoretical limits on how quickly the best arm can be identified, and shows that the EOCP algorithms are either optimal or near-optimal in this regard. Numerical experiments also suggest that classic "explore-then-commit" algorithms like UCB may actually do more exploration than is necessary, leading to lower overall rewards than the EOCP approach.

Technical Explanation

The multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem is a classic reinforcement learning setting where a learner is faced with multiple "arms" (options), each of which provides a random reward when "pulled" (selected). The goal is to maximize the total rewards earned over a sequence of $T$ rounds by determining which arm is optimal (has the highest expected reward).

This paper considers a stochastic MAB problem with two objectives: (1) quickly identifying and committing to the optimal arm, and (2) maximizing rewards throughout the sequence of $T$ rounds. These objectives are in tension, as quickly identifying the optimal arm may require extensive "exploration" of the different arms, which can reduce short-term rewards.

To address this, the authors introduce Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification (ROBAI), which aims to achieve both objectives simultaneously. They present an algorithm called EOCP and variants that:

1. Achieve asymptotically optimal regret (a measure of reward loss compared to always playing the optimal arm) in both Gaussian and general bandits.
2. Commit to the optimal arm in $\mathcal{O}(\log T)$ rounds with a pre-determined stopping time, or $\mathcal{O}(\log^2 T)$ rounds with an adaptive stopping time.

The paper also characterizes lower bounds on the time to identify the optimal arm, showing that EOCP and variants are either sample-optimal (with pre-determined stopping) or almost sample-optimal (with adaptive stopping).

Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical analysis and reveal an interesting "over-exploration" phenomenon with classic UCB algorithms. Despite stopping exploration much earlier ($\mathcal{O}(\log T)$ vs. $\mathcal{O}(T)$), EOCP achieves lower regret, suggesting that excessive exploration can be unnecessary and even harmful to system performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes important contributions by addressing the simultaneous objectives of quickly identifying the optimal arm and maximizing rewards in a multi-armed bandit setting, which is a significant open problem in the field.

One limitation mentioned is that the lower bounds on commitment time (sample complexity) for the adaptive stopping case are not tight, leaving room for potential improvement. The authors also note that their analysis assumes the rewards are sub-Gaussian, which may not hold in all practical scenarios.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the asymptotic performance of the algorithms, but does not provide a thorough analysis of their finite-time behavior. Understanding the algorithms' performance in realistic, non-asymptotic settings would be valuable for practitioners.

Another potential area for further research is exploring the trade-offs between exploration and exploitation in more detail. The paper's observation about "over-exploration" by classic UCB algorithms suggests there may be room for more efficient exploration strategies.

Overall, the paper presents a strong theoretical foundation and promising algorithms for the ROBAI problem, but additional research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the proposed approaches.

Conclusion

This paper addresses the important challenge of simultaneously achieving quick identification of the optimal arm and reward maximization in a multi-armed bandit setting, an open problem with practical significance. The introduced Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification (ROBAI) framework and associated EOCP algorithms demonstrate strong theoretical guarantees, including asymptotically optimal regret and near-optimal sample complexity for identifying the best arm.

The paper's insights into the potential pitfalls of "over-exploration" by classic algorithms like UCB also suggest avenues for further improving the efficiency of exploration-exploitation trade-offs in multi-armed bandit problems. While the theoretical foundation is solid, additional research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the ROBAI approach, particularly in non-asymptotic regimes. Overall, this work represents an important step forward in addressing a fundamental challenge at the intersection of reinforcement learning and optimal decision-making.