Fatigue and mental underload further pronounced in L3 conditionally automated driving: Results from an EEG experiment on a test track
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the effects of conditional automation (Level 3 autonomy) on driver fatigue and mental underload during a test track experiment.
- The researchers used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure changes in brain activity as drivers navigated the test track in manual and automated driving modes.
- The results suggest that fatigue and mental underload are more pronounced in conditional automation compared to manual driving, highlighting the need for effective countermeasures.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how a certain level of automated driving, known as "conditional automation" or Level 3, can impact a driver's mental state and level of fatigue. In this type of automation, the car can handle some driving tasks on its own, but the driver must still be ready to take back control at any moment.
The researchers ran an experiment where they had drivers navigate a test track, both in manual driving mode and in the conditional automation mode. They used EEG, which measures electrical activity in the brain, to see how the drivers' brains responded in these different conditions.
The key finding is that drivers experienced more fatigue and mental underload (a state of boredom or lack of mental stimulation) when using the conditional automation compared to manual driving. This suggests that even though the car is handling some of the driving, the driver still has to remain vigilant and ready to intervene, which can be mentally draining over time.
The implication is that as we move towards higher levels of automated driving, we'll need to find ways to keep drivers engaged and alert, so they don't become overly fatigued or mentally checked out. This could involve better interface designs, additional tasks to keep the driver's mind active, or ways to detect when the driver is starting to experience fatigue and provide timely warnings or intervention.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an EEG experiment conducted on a test track to evaluate the effects of Level 3 conditional automation on driver fatigue and mental underload.
The experiment involved 22 participants navigating a test track in two conditions: manual driving and conditional automation (L3). EEG data was collected to measure changes in brain activity, which the researchers used as indicators of fatigue and mental underload.
The results showed that fatigue and mental underload were more pronounced in the L3 conditional automation condition compared to manual driving. Specifically, the EEG data revealed increased theta and alpha power, which are associated with drowsiness and disengagement, in the L3 condition.
These findings suggest that even though the car is handling some driving tasks, the driver still needs to remain vigilant and ready to take over, leading to greater mental strain over time. This underscores the need for effective countermeasures to maintain driver engagement and alertness in conditionally automated driving.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the cognitive challenges faced by drivers in conditional automation scenarios. However, it is important to note some potential limitations and areas for further research.
The experiment was conducted on a test track, which may not fully capture the complexity and distractions of real-world driving conditions. Additionally, the sample size of 22 participants, while not uncommon for EEG studies, could be expanded to increase the generalizability of the findings.
Future research could explore the effects of prolonged exposure to conditional automation, as well as the potential impacts of individual differences in factors like age, experience, and personality on driver fatigue and mental underload.
It would also be interesting to investigate the effectiveness of various countermeasures, such as adaptive interface designs, task-based interventions, or physiological monitoring, in maintaining driver engagement and alertness in conditionally automated driving scenarios.
Conclusion
This study highlights the cognitive challenges associated with Level 3 conditional automation, where drivers must remain vigilant and ready to take over driving tasks at any moment. The findings suggest that fatigue and mental underload are more pronounced in this level of automation compared to manual driving.
As the automotive industry continues to develop and deploy more advanced autonomous technologies, it will be crucial to address these human factors challenges to ensure the safety and well-being of drivers. Effective countermeasures and personalized approaches will be necessary to maintain driver engagement and prevent the negative impacts of conditional automation on cognitive states.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fatigue and mental underload further pronounced in L3 conditionally automated driving: Results from an EEG experiment on a test track
Nikol Figalov'a, Hans Joachim Bieg, Michael Schulz, Jurgen Pichen, Martin Baumann, Lewis Chuang, Olga Pollatos
Drivers' role changes with increasing automation from the primary driver to a system supervisor. This study investigates how supervising an SAE L2 and L3 automated vehicle (AV) affects drivers' mental workload and sleepiness compared to manual driving. Using an AV prototype on a test track, the oscillatory brain activity of 23 adult participants was recorded during L2, L3, and manual driving. Results showed decreased mental workload and increased sleepiness in L3 drives compared to L2 and manual drives, indicated by self-report scales and changes in the frontal alpha and theta power spectral density. These findings suggest that fatigue and mental underload are significant issues in L3 driving and should be considered when designing future AV interfaces.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Human-Machine Interface Evaluation Using EEG in Driving Simulator
Y. C. Liu, N. Figalova, M. Baumann, K Bengler
Automated vehicles are pictured as the future of transportation, and facilitating safer driving is only one of the many benefits. However, due to the constantly changing role of the human driver, users are easily confused and have little knowledge about their responsibilities. Being the bridge between automation and human, the human-machine interface (HMI) is of great importance to driving safety. This study was conducted in a static driving simulator. Three HMI designs were developed, among which significant differences in mental workload using NASA-TLX and the subjective transparency test were found. An electroencephalogram was applied throughout the study to determine if differences in the mental workload could also be found using EEG's spectral power analysis. Results suggested that more studies are required to determine the effectiveness of the spectral power of EEG on mental workload, but the three interface designs developed in this study could serve as a solid basis for future research to evaluate the effectiveness of psychophysiological measures. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions; Innovative Training Network (ITN); SHAPE-IT; Grant number 860410; Publication date: [27 July 2023]; DOI: [10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186567]
Read more6/17/2024
📈
0
Predicting cognitive load in immersive driving scenarios with a hybrid CNN-RNN model
Mehshan Ahmed Khan, Houshyar Asadi, Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani, Adetokunbo Arogbonlo, Saeid Nahavandi, Chee Peng Lim
One debatable issue in traffic safety research is that cognitive load from sec-ondary tasks reduces primary task performance, such as driving. Although physiological signals have been extensively used in driving-related research to assess cognitive load, only a few studies have specifically focused on high cognitive load scenarios. Most existing studies tend to examine moderate or low levels of cognitive load In this study, we adopted an auditory version of the n-back task of three levels as a cognitively loading secondary task while driving in a driving simulator. During the simultaneous execution of driving and the n-back task, we recorded fNIRS, eye-tracking, and driving behavior data to predict cognitive load at three different levels. To the best of our knowledge, this combination of data sources has never been used before. Un-like most previous studies that utilize binary classification of cognitive load and driving in conditions without traffic, our study involved three levels of cognitive load, with drivers operating in normal traffic conditions under low visibility, specifically during nighttime and rainy weather. We proposed a hybrid neural network combining a 1D Convolutional Neural Network and a Recurrent Neural Network to predict cognitive load. Our experimental re-sults demonstrate that the proposed model, with fewer parameters, increases accuracy from 99.82% to 99.99% using physiological data, and from 87.26% to 92.02% using driving behavior data alone. This significant improvement highlights the effectiveness of our hybrid neural network in accurately pre-dicting cognitive load during driving under challenging conditions.
Read more8/14/2024
📊
0
System Immersion of a Driving Simulator Affects the Oscillatory Brain Activity
Nikol Figalov'a, Jurgen Pichen, Lewis L. Chuang, Martin Baumann, Olga Pollatos
The technological properties of a system delivering simulation experience are a crucial dimension of immersion. To create a sense of presence and reproduce drivers behaviour as realistically as possible, we need reliable driving simulators that allow drivers to become highly immersed. This study investigates the impact of a system immersion of a driving simulator on the drivers' brain activity while operating a conditionally automated vehicle. Nineteen participants drove approximately 40 minutes while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). We found a significant effect of the system immersion in the occipital and parietal areas, primarily in the high-Beta bandwidth. No effect was found in the Theta, Alpha, and low-Beta bandwidths. These findings suggest that the system immersion might influence the drivers' physiological arousal, consequently influencing their cognitive and emotional processes.
Read more6/21/2024