Fault-tolerant Consensus in Anonymous Dynamic Network
2405.03017
0
0
🌐
Abstract
This paper studies the feasibility of reaching consensus in an anonymous dynamic network. In our model, $n$ anonymous nodes proceed in synchronous rounds. We adopt a hybrid fault model in which up to $f$ nodes may suffer crash or Byzantine faults, and the dynamic message adversary chooses a communication graph for each round. We introduce a stability property of the dynamic network -- $(T,D)$-dynaDegree for $T geq 1$ and $n-1 geq D geq 1$ -- which requires that for every $T$ consecutive rounds, any fault-free node must have incoming directed links from at least $D$ distinct neighbors. These links might occur in different rounds during a $T$-round interval. $(1,n-1)$-dynaDegree means that the graph is a complete graph in every round. $(1,1)$-dynaDegree means that each node has at least one incoming neighbor in every round, but the set of incoming neighbor(s) at each node may change arbitrarily between rounds. We show that exact consensus is impossible even with $(1,n-2)$-dynaDegree. For an arbitrary $T$, we show that for crash-tolerant approximate consensus, $(T,lfloor n/2 rfloor)$-dynaDegree and $n > 2f$ are together necessary and sufficient, whereas for Byzantine approximate consensus, $(T,lfloor (n+3f)/2 rfloor)$-dynaDegree and $n > 5f$ are together necessary and sufficient.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenge of achieving fault-tolerant consensus in anonymous dynamic networks, where the identities and membership of the nodes are not known.
- The authors investigate the fundamental limits of consensus in such environments, proving impossibility results and providing resilient protocols that can tolerate message adversaries.
- The research has implications for distributed systems, blockchain, and other applications where reliable coordination is needed in uncertain, dynamic network conditions.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers examine the problem of reaching agreement, or consensus, in computer networks where the identities of the participants are unknown and the network itself is constantly changing. This is a common challenge in many real-world applications, such as blockchain and distributed systems.
The key difficulty is that without knowing who the other participants are, it becomes very hard to determine who to trust and coordinate with. An attacker could potentially join the network, pretend to be multiple participants, and disrupt the consensus process. This is known as a Byzantine failure, where some nodes in the network are behaving maliciously.
The researchers prove that in these anonymous, dynamic network conditions, it is impossible to achieve perfect consensus that tolerates even a single Byzantine fault. However, they develop protocols that can achieve a weaker form of consensus, known as approximate consensus, where the participants converge to near-identical values despite the presence of faulty nodes.
These protocols work by having the nodes repeatedly exchange information and gradually adjusting their local values. As long as the majority of nodes are behaving correctly, the system can converge to a stable state. The authors show that their protocols are resilient to a wide range of message adversaries, which can selectively disrupt or delay the communication between nodes.
The techniques developed in this paper have important implications for distributed systems, social networks, and other applications where reliable coordination is needed in uncertain, dynamic environments. By understanding the fundamental limits and designing robust protocols, the researchers are helping to pave the way for more resilient and secure distributed systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the problem of fault-tolerant consensus in anonymous dynamic networks, where the identities and membership of the nodes are not known. The authors investigate the fundamental limits of consensus in such environments, proving impossibility results and providing resilient protocols that can tolerate message adversaries.
The key challenge is that without knowing the other participants, it becomes very difficult to determine who to trust and coordinate with. An adversary could potentially join the network, pretend to be multiple participants, and disrupt the consensus process. This is known as a Byzantine failure.
The researchers first prove that in these anonymous, dynamic network conditions, it is impossible to achieve perfect consensus that tolerates even a single Byzantine fault. However, they develop protocols that can achieve a weaker form of consensus, known as approximate consensus, where the participants converge to near-identical values despite the presence of faulty nodes.
The proposed protocols work by having the nodes repeatedly exchange information and gradually adjusting their local values. As long as the majority of nodes are behaving correctly, the system can converge to a stable state. The authors show that their protocols are resilient to a wide range of message adversaries, which can selectively disrupt or delay the communication between nodes.
The techniques developed in this paper have important implications for distributed systems, blockchain, social networks, and other applications where reliable coordination is needed in uncertain, dynamic environments. By understanding the fundamental limits and designing robust protocols, the researchers are helping to pave the way for more resilient and secure distributed systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of the fundamental limits of consensus in anonymous dynamic networks. The authors' proofs of impossibility and the design of resilient protocols are technically sound and make valuable contributions to the field.
However, one potential limitation is the reliance on the message adversary model, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world network dynamics and adversarial behavior. In practice, there may be other types of failures or attacks that the proposed protocols do not explicitly address.
Additionally, the paper focuses on achieving approximate consensus, which may not be sufficient for all applications. In some cases, full consensus may be necessary, and the impossibility result presented in the paper suggests that alternative approaches or assumptions may be required to achieve this.
Further research could explore the interplay between various network characteristics, adversarial models, and the levels of consensus required. Investigating the practical performance and implementation challenges of the proposed protocols would also be valuable for bridging the gap between theory and real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the fundamental challenge of achieving fault-tolerant consensus in anonymous dynamic networks, where the identities and membership of the nodes are not known. The researchers prove that perfect consensus is impossible in such environments, but develop resilient protocols that can achieve approximate consensus despite the presence of Byzantine faults and message adversaries.
The techniques and insights presented in this work have important implications for the design of distributed systems, blockchain, and other applications where reliable coordination is needed in uncertain, dynamic network conditions. By understanding the limits and developing robust protocols, the researchers are contributing to the advancement of more secure and resilient distributed computing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Synchronous Consensus in Partial Synchrony
Ivan Klianev
0
0
We demonstrate a deterministic Byzantine consensus algorithm with synchronous operation in partial synchrony. It is naturally leaderless, tolerates any number of $ f<n/2 $ Byzantine processes with 2 rounds of exchange of originator-only signed messages, and terminates within a bounded interval of time. The algorithm is resilient to transient faults and asynchrony in a fraction of links with known size per number of faulty processes. It circumvents asynchronous and faulty links with 3-hop epidemic dissemination. Key finding: the resilience to asynchrony of links and the enabled by it leaderless consensus in partial synchrony ensure algorithm operation with simultaneous validity, safety, and bounded liveness.
5/16/2024
🏅
D-CAST: Distributed Consensus Switch in Wireless Trustworthy Autonomous System
Dachao Yu, Jiayuan Ma, Hao Xu
0
0
The protocols of distributed consensus normally aim to tolerate different types of faults including crash faults and byzantine faults that occur in the distributed systems. However, the dynamic network topology and stochastic wireless channels may cause the same trustworthy system to suffer both crash fault and byzantine fault. This article proposes the concept of a distributed consensus autonomous switch mechanism in trustworthy autonomous systems (D-CAST) to reach the different fault tolerance requirements of the dynamic nodes and discusses the challenges of D-CAST while it is implemented in the wireless trustworthy system.
5/15/2024
🛠️
Nearly-Optimal Consensus Tolerating Adaptive Omissions: Why is a Lot of Randomness is Needed?
Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi, Dariusz R. Kowalski, Jan Olkowski
0
0
We study the problem of reaching agreement in a synchronous distributed system by $n$ autonomous parties, when the communication links from/to faulty parties can omit messages. The faulty parties are selected and controlled by an adaptive, full-information, computationally unbounded adversary. We design a randomized algorithm that works in $O(sqrt{n}log^2 n)$ rounds and sends $O(n^2log^3 n)$ communication bits, where the number of faulty parties is $Theta(n)$. Our result is simultaneously tight for both these measures within polylogarithmic factors: due to the $Omega(n^2)$ lower bound on communication by Abraham et al. (PODC'19) and $Omega(sqrt{n/log n})$ lower bound on the number of rounds by Bar-Joseph and Ben-Or (PODC'98). We also quantify how much randomness is necessary and sufficient to reduce time complexity to a certain value, while keeping the communication complexity (nearly) optimal. We prove that no MC algorithm can work in less than $Omega(frac{n^2}{max{R,n}log n})$ rounds if it uses less than $O(R)$ calls to a random source, assuming a constant fraction of faulty parties. This can be contrasted with a long line of work on consensus against an {em adversary limited to polynomial computation time}, thus unable to break cryptographic primitives, culminating in a work by Ghinea et al. (EUROCRYPT'22), where an optimal $O(r)$-round solution with probability $1-(cr)^{-r}$ is given. Our lower bound strictly separates these two regimes, by excluding such results if the adversary is computationally unbounded. On the upper bound side, we show that for $Rintilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ there exists an algorithm solving consensus in $tilde{O}(frac{n^2}{R})$ rounds with high probability, where tilde notation hides a polylogarithmic factor. The communication complexity of the algorithm does not depend on the amount of randomness $R$ and stays optimal within polylogarithmic factor.
5/27/2024
Consensus Through Knot Discovery in Asynchronous Dynamic Networks
Rachel Bricker, Mikhail Nesterenko, Gokarna Sharma
0
0
We state the Problem of Knot Identification as a way to achieve consensus in dynamic networks. The network adversary is asynchronous and not oblivious. The network may be disconnected throughout the computation. We determine the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a solution to the Knot Identification Problem: the knots must be observable by all processes and the first observed knot must be the same for all processes. We present an algorithm KIA that solves it. We conduct KIA performance evaluation.
6/10/2024