On the Feasibility of Fidelity$^-$ for Graph Pruning

Read original: arXiv:2406.11504 - Published 6/18/2024 by Yong-Min Shin, Won-Yong Shin

On the Feasibility of Fidelity$^-$ for Graph Pruning

Overview

This paper explores the feasibility of using fidelity-based graph pruning, which aims to preserve the most important information in a graph while reducing its size.
The authors investigate the challenges and limitations of using fidelity-based approaches for graph pruning, which is a critical task in many applications like network optimization and visualization.
The paper provides insights into the trade-offs between graph fidelity and pruning performance, and highlights the need for more robust and reliable graph pruning techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Graphs are mathematical structures that represent relationships between objects or entities. They are used in many applications, such as social networks, transportation systems, and biological networks. However, as graphs become larger and more complex, it can be difficult to work with them efficiently.

Graph pruning is a technique used to reduce the size of a graph by removing less important nodes and edges, while still preserving the essential structure and information. One approach to graph pruning is called "fidelity-based" pruning, which aims to keep the most important parts of the graph.

In this paper, the researchers investigate the feasibility of using fidelity-based pruning for graphs. They explore the challenges and limitations of this approach, such as the trade-offs between graph fidelity (how well the pruned graph represents the original) and the performance of the pruning process.

The authors provide insights that can help researchers and practitioners develop more robust and reliable graph pruning techniques. For example, they suggest that alternative approaches to measuring graph fidelity may be needed to better capture the essential information in a graph.

Overall, this paper contributes to the ongoing research on explainable AI methods for graphs, which is crucial for many real-world applications that rely on understanding and manipulating complex network-based data.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the feasibility of using fidelity-based approaches for graph pruning. Fidelity-based pruning aims to preserve the most important information in a graph while reducing its size, which is a critical task in many applications.

The authors first provide a review of related work on graph pruning and fidelity measures for evaluating the quality of pruned graphs. They then present a detailed analysis of the challenges and limitations of using fidelity-based pruning.

The key insights from the technical analysis include:

Fidelity-based pruning can be effective at preserving important graph structures, but it often struggles to balance the trade-off between graph fidelity and pruning performance.
Existing fidelity measures may not be sufficient to accurately capture the essential information in a graph, leading to suboptimal pruning results.
The performance of fidelity-based pruning can be highly sensitive to the specific graph properties and the choice of fidelity measure, making it difficult to develop a robust and generalizable approach.

The authors also discuss potential directions for further research, such as exploring alternative methods for evaluating graph explanations and investigating the use of more advanced machine learning techniques for graph pruning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and detailed analysis of the challenges and limitations of using fidelity-based approaches for graph pruning. The authors clearly articulate the trade-offs between graph fidelity and pruning performance, and raise important questions about the adequacy of existing fidelity measures for capturing the essential information in a graph.

One potential limitation of the research is the lack of empirical evaluation on a diverse set of real-world graph datasets. The authors primarily discuss the theoretical and conceptual challenges of fidelity-based pruning, but more extensive testing and validation on various graph types and applications would help to strengthen the conclusions and provide a clearer picture of the practical feasibility of this approach.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into potential solutions or alternative techniques for graph pruning that could address the shortcomings of fidelity-based methods. While the authors suggest some directions for future research, a more comprehensive exploration of other promising approaches, such as counterfactual explanations for graphs or improved interpretation techniques for graph neural networks, could further enhance the value of this work.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing research on graph pruning and the challenges of preserving the essential structure and information in complex network-based data. The insights provided can help guide future work in this area and inspire the development of more robust and reliable graph analysis techniques.

Conclusion

This paper critically examines the feasibility of using fidelity-based approaches for graph pruning, a crucial task in many real-world applications. The authors identify key challenges and limitations of this method, including the trade-offs between graph fidelity and pruning performance, as well as the inadequacies of existing fidelity measures for accurately capturing the essential information in a graph.

The findings from this research highlight the need for more robust and reliable graph pruning techniques that can balance the competing objectives of preserving important graph structures and efficiently reducing the size of complex network-based data. The insights provided can guide future work in this area, potentially leading to the development of advanced explainable AI methods for graphs that are better equipped to handle the nuances and complexities of real-world graph data.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On the Feasibility of Fidelity$^-$ for Graph Pruning

Yong-Min Shin, Won-Yong Shin

As one of popular quantitative metrics to assess the quality of explanation of graph neural networks (GNNs), fidelity measures the output difference after removing unimportant parts of the input graph. Fidelity has been widely used due to its straightforward interpretation that the underlying model should produce similar predictions when features deemed unimportant from the explanation are removed. This raises a natural question: Does fidelity induce a global (soft) mask for graph pruning? To solve this, we aim to explore the potential of the fidelity measure to be used for graph pruning, eventually enhancing the GNN models for better efficiency. To this end, we propose Fidelity$^-$-inspired Pruning (FiP), an effective framework to construct global edge masks from local explanations. Our empirical observations using 7 edge attribution methods demonstrate that, surprisingly, general eXplainable AI methods outperform methods tailored to GNNs in terms of graph pruning performance.

6/18/2024

Perks and Pitfalls of Faithfulness in Regular, Self-Explainable and Domain Invariant GNNs

Steve Azzolin, Antonio Longa, Stefano Teso, Andrea Passerini

As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) become more pervasive, it becomes paramount to build robust tools for computing explanations of their predictions. A key desideratum is that these explanations are faithful, i.e., that they portray an accurate picture of the GNN's reasoning process. A number of different faithfulness metrics exist, begging the question of what faithfulness is exactly, and what its properties are. We begin by showing that existing metrics are not interchangeable -- i.e., explanations attaining high faithfulness according to one metric may be unfaithful according to others -- and can be systematically insensitive to important properties of the explanation, and suggest how to address these issues. We proceed to show that, surprisingly, optimizing for faithfulness is not always a sensible design goal. Specifically, we show that for injective regular GNN architectures, perfectly faithful explanations are completely uninformative. The situation is different for modular GNNs, such as self-explainable and domain-invariant architectures, where optimizing faithfulness does not compromise informativeness, and is also unexpectedly tied to out-of-distribution generalization.

6/24/2024

💬

Faithfulness Measurable Masked Language Models

Andreas Madsen, Siva Reddy, Sarath Chandar

A common approach to explaining NLP models is to use importance measures that express which tokens are important for a prediction. Unfortunately, such explanations are often wrong despite being persuasive. Therefore, it is essential to measure their faithfulness. One such metric is if tokens are truly important, then masking them should result in worse model performance. However, token masking introduces out-of-distribution issues, and existing solutions that address this are computationally expensive and employ proxy models. Furthermore, other metrics are very limited in scope. This work proposes an inherently faithfulness measurable model that addresses these challenges. This is achieved using a novel fine-tuning method that incorporates masking, such that masking tokens become in-distribution by design. This differs from existing approaches, which are completely model-agnostic but are inapplicable in practice. We demonstrate the generality of our approach by applying it to 16 different datasets and validate it using statistical in-distribution tests. The faithfulness is then measured with 9 different importance measures. Because masking is in-distribution, importance measures that themselves use masking become consistently more faithful. Additionally, because the model makes faithfulness cheap to measure, we can optimize explanations towards maximal faithfulness; thus, our model becomes indirectly inherently explainable.

8/29/2024

💬

Robust Infidelity: When Faithfulness Measures on Masked Language Models Are Misleading

Evan Crothers, Herna Viktor, Nathalie Japkowicz

A common approach to quantifying neural text classifier interpretability is to calculate faithfulness metrics based on iteratively masking salient input tokens and measuring changes in the model prediction. We propose that this property is better described as sensitivity to iterative masking, and highlight pitfalls in using this measure for comparing text classifier interpretability. We show that iterative masking produces large variation in faithfulness scores between otherwise comparable Transformer encoder text classifiers. We then demonstrate that iteratively masked samples produce embeddings outside the distribution seen during training, resulting in unpredictable behaviour. We further explore task-specific considerations that undermine principled comparison of interpretability using iterative masking, such as an underlying similarity to salience-based adversarial attacks. Our findings give insight into how these behaviours affect neural text classifiers, and provide guidance on how sensitivity to iterative masking should be interpreted.

6/4/2024