Federated $mathcal{X}$-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation

Read original: arXiv:2409.07251 - Published 9/12/2024 by Ali Arabzadeh, James A. Grant, David S. Leslie
Total Score

0

Federated $mathcal{X}$-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Federated learning (FL) allows multiple devices to collaboratively train a shared machine learning model without directly sharing their data.
  • Multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems involve optimizing the selection of actions (or "arms") to maximize rewards.
  • This paper proposes a federated X-armed bandit algorithm with flexible personalization, which aims to address challenges in federated MAB settings.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new approach called Federated X-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation. This combines the ideas of federated learning and multi-armed bandits.

In a typical multi-armed bandit problem, there are multiple "arms" (actions) and the goal is to choose the arms that maximize the total rewards. Federated learning allows multiple devices to collaborate on training a shared model without directly sharing their data.

The key innovation in this paper is adding "personalization" to the federated multi-armed bandit setting. This means the algorithm can learn personalized models for each individual device, rather than just a single global model. This is important because different users may have very different preferences or contexts, so a one-size-fits-all approach may not work well.

The paper presents a technical algorithm for this federated multi-armed bandit with personalization, and demonstrates through experiments that it can outperform simpler approaches, especially when there is a lot of diversity in user preferences.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a Federated X-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation (FXBP) algorithm. This extends the standard federated learning setting to the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem.

In the FXBP algorithm, each client (device) maintains its own personalized MAB model, rather than a single global model. The clients collaborate by sharing model updates with a central server, which aggregates the updates and sends back a merged model to each client.

This personalized approach allows the algorithm to adapt to the unique preferences of each user, rather than optimizing for an average user. The paper shows that this can lead to significantly better performance compared to a non-personalized federated MAB approach, especially when there is high diversity in user preferences.

The authors also introduce a "flexible" personalization mechanism, which allows the degree of personalization to be adjusted based on the specific problem setting. This provides a knob to trade off between the benefits of personalization and the computational/communication cost.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of personalization in federated multi-armed bandit problems. The proposed FXBP algorithm provides a principled way to achieve this personalization, and the experimental results demonstrate its advantages.

However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or areas for further research:

  • Scalability: As the number of clients grows, the communication and computation costs of the personalized models may become prohibitive. Strategies for efficient scaling would be an important area to explore.
  • Practical Deployment: The paper assumes a relatively idealized federated learning setting. Deploying such an algorithm in real-world scenarios with heterogeneous devices, unreliable connections, and practical constraints would likely introduce additional challenges.
  • Interpretability: The personalized models may be difficult to interpret or understand, which could limit their usefulness in certain applications. Techniques for improving the interpretability of the models could be valuable.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach, but further research is needed to address these types of practical concerns and limitations.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel Federated X-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation algorithm that combines the concepts of federated learning and multi-armed bandits with personalization.

The key innovation is allowing each client to maintain its own personalized multi-armed bandit model, rather than a single global model. This enables the algorithm to adapt to the unique preferences of each user, leading to improved performance compared to non-personalized approaches.

The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation and experimental validation for this approach. While there are some practical challenges that merit further research, the FXBP algorithm represents an important step forward in the field of federated learning and multi-armed bandits.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Federated $mathcal{X}$-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation
Total Score

0

Federated $mathcal{X}$-armed Bandit with Flexible Personalisation

Ali Arabzadeh, James A. Grant, David S. Leslie

This paper introduces a novel approach to personalised federated learning within the $mathcal{X}$-armed bandit framework, addressing the challenge of optimising both local and global objectives in a highly heterogeneous environment. Our method employs a surrogate objective function that combines individual client preferences with aggregated global knowledge, allowing for a flexible trade-off between personalisation and collective learning. We propose a phase-based elimination algorithm that achieves sublinear regret with logarithmic communication overhead, making it well-suited for federated settings. Theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing methods. Potential applications of this work span various domains, including healthcare, smart home devices, and e-commerce, where balancing personalisation with global insights is crucial.

Read more

9/12/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Federated Combinatorial Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits

Fares Fourati, Mohamed-Slim Alouini, Vaneet Aggarwal

This paper introduces a federated learning framework tailored for online combinatorial optimization with bandit feedback. In this setting, agents select subsets of arms, observe noisy rewards for these subsets without accessing individual arm information, and can cooperate and share information at specific intervals. Our framework transforms any offline resilient single-agent $(alpha-epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, having a complexity of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{psi}{epsilon^beta})$, where the logarithm is omitted, for some function $psi$ and constant $beta$, into an online multi-agent algorithm with $m$ communicating agents and an $alpha$-regret of no more than $tilde{mathcal{O}}(m^{-frac{1}{3+beta}} psi^frac{1}{3+beta} T^frac{2+beta}{3+beta})$. This approach not only eliminates the $epsilon$ approximation error but also ensures sublinear growth with respect to the time horizon $T$ and demonstrates a linear speedup with an increasing number of communicating agents. Additionally, the algorithm is notably communication-efficient, requiring only a sublinear number of communication rounds, quantified as $tilde{mathcal{O}}left(psi T^frac{beta}{beta+1}right)$. Furthermore, the framework has been successfully applied to online stochastic submodular maximization using various offline algorithms, yielding the first results for both single-agent and multi-agent settings and recovering specialized single-agent theoretical guarantees. We empirically validate our approach to a stochastic data summarization problem, illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed framework, even in single-agent scenarios.

Read more

5/10/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Personalized Federated Learning Techniques: Empirical Analysis

Azal Ahmad Khan, Ahmad Faraz Khan, Haider Ali, Ali Anwar

Personalized Federated Learning (pFL) holds immense promise for tailoring machine learning models to individual users while preserving data privacy. However, achieving optimal performance in pFL often requires a careful balancing act between memory overhead costs and model accuracy. This paper delves into the trade-offs inherent in pFL, offering valuable insights for selecting the right algorithms for diverse real-world scenarios. We empirically evaluate ten prominent pFL techniques across various datasets and data splits, uncovering significant differences in their performance. Our study reveals interesting insights into how pFL methods that utilize personalized (local) aggregation exhibit the fastest convergence due to their efficiency in communication and computation. Conversely, fine-tuning methods face limitations in handling data heterogeneity and potential adversarial attacks while multi-objective learning methods achieve higher accuracy at the cost of additional training and resource consumption. Our study emphasizes the critical role of communication efficiency in scaling pFL, demonstrating how it can significantly affect resource usage in real-world deployments.

Read more

9/12/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Locally Adaptive Federated Learning

Sohom Mukherjee, Nicolas Loizou, Sebastian U. Stich

Federated learning is a paradigm of distributed machine learning in which multiple clients coordinate with a central server to learn a model, without sharing their own training data. Standard federated optimization methods such as Federated Averaging (FedAvg) ensure balance among the clients by using the same stepsize for local updates on all clients. However, this means that all clients need to respect the global geometry of the function which could yield slow convergence. In this work, we propose locally adaptive federated learning algorithms, that leverage the local geometric information for each client function. We show that such locally adaptive methods with uncoordinated stepsizes across all clients can be particularly efficient in interpolated (overparameterized) settings, and analyze their convergence in the presence of heterogeneous data for convex and strongly convex settings. We validate our theoretical claims by performing illustrative experiments for both i.i.d. non-i.i.d. cases. Our proposed algorithms match the optimization performance of tuned FedAvg in the convex setting, outperform FedAvg as well as state-of-the-art adaptive federated algorithms like FedAMS for non-convex experiments, and come with superior generalization performance.

Read more

5/15/2024