FedMID: A Data-Free Method for Using Intermediate Outputs as a Defense Mechanism Against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a data-free method called FedMID to defend against poisoning attacks in federated learning
- Leverages intermediate outputs of the model to detect and mitigate malicious updates from clients
- Aims to protect the global model without requiring access to clients' private data
Plain English Explanation
FedMID: A Data-Free Method for Using Intermediate Outputs as a Defense Mechanism Against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning is a technique designed to protect the central model in a federated learning system from poisoning attacks. In a federated learning setup, multiple clients (e.g., devices or organizations) collaborate to train a shared model without directly sharing their private data. However, this setup is vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients try to manipulate the global model by sending malicious updates.
The key idea behind FedMID is to use the intermediate outputs of the model, rather than the final outputs or the raw data, to detect and mitigate these malicious updates. By analyzing the intermediate representations, the central server can identify suspicious updates without needing access to the clients' private data. This approach allows the system to maintain privacy while also defending against poisoning attacks.
Technical Explanation
FedMID: A Data-Free Method for Using Intermediate Outputs as a Defense Mechanism Against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning introduces a novel defense mechanism that leverages the intermediate outputs of the machine learning model to detect and mitigate poisoning attacks in federated learning.
In a federated learning setup, multiple clients collaboratively train a shared global model by sending model updates to a central server, which then aggregates these updates to update the global model. However, this process is vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients send intentionally crafted updates to sabotage the global model.
The authors of this paper propose FedMID, a data-free defense mechanism that uses the intermediate outputs of the model to identify and filter out malicious updates. Specifically, the central server maintains a set of clean intermediate outputs, obtained from a small set of trusted clients. When the server receives an update from a client, it compares the client's intermediate outputs with the clean set to assess the update's validity. If the update is deemed suspicious, it is either rejected or downweighted during the aggregation process.
The key advantage of this approach is that it does not require access to the clients' private data, which is a common limitation of many existing defense mechanisms. By focusing on the intermediate representations, FedMID can effectively detect and mitigate poisoning attacks without compromising the privacy of the participating clients.
The authors evaluate the performance of FedMID on various benchmark datasets and poisoning attack scenarios, and demonstrate its effectiveness in protecting the global model from malicious updates. The results show that FedMID can achieve a high detection rate while maintaining a low false positive rate, outperforming several baseline defense methods.
Critical Analysis
The FedMID approach presents a promising data-free defense mechanism against poisoning attacks in federated learning. By leveraging the intermediate outputs of the model, the central server can effectively detect and mitigate malicious updates without requiring access to the clients' private data, which is a significant advantage over many existing defense methods.
However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the performance of FedMID may depend on the similarity between the clean intermediate outputs and the legitimate client updates. If the client updates exhibit significant variation, the central server may struggle to accurately distinguish between benign and malicious updates. Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of FedMID as the number of clients or the complexity of the model increases.
Another potential concern is the impact of FedMID on the overall performance of the federated learning system. By rejecting or downweighting suspicious updates, the central server may be sacrificing some valuable information that could have contributed to the global model's performance. The authors should investigate the trade-offs between the defense capabilities of FedMID and its impact on the model's accuracy and convergence rate.
Furthermore, the paper does not discuss the potential for adversarial attacks targeting the FedMID defense mechanism itself. It would be valuable to explore the robustness of FedMID against adaptive adversaries who might try to circumvent the defense by crafting updates that mimic the clean intermediate outputs.
Overall, FedMID represents a promising step towards addressing the issue of poisoning attacks in federated learning. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the broader implications of this approach, both in terms of its effectiveness and its impact on the overall federated learning system.
Conclusion
FedMID: A Data-Free Method for Using Intermediate Outputs as a Defense Mechanism Against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning proposes a novel defense mechanism that leverages the intermediate outputs of the machine learning model to detect and mitigate poisoning attacks in federated learning. By comparing the intermediate representations of client updates with a set of clean references, the central server can effectively identify and filter out malicious updates without requiring access to the clients' private data.
The key advantage of this approach is its ability to maintain privacy while also protecting the global model from poisoning attacks, which is a significant challenge in federated learning. The authors' experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of FedMID in various attack scenarios, outperforming several baseline defense methods.
While FedMID presents a promising solution, the paper also highlights the need for further research to address the potential limitations and explore the broader implications of this approach. Investigating the scalability, performance trade-offs, and robustness of FedMID against adaptive adversaries are important areas for future work. As federated learning continues to gain prominence, the development of effective and privacy-preserving defense mechanisms like FedMID will be crucial for the widespread adoption and deployment of these systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FedMID: A Data-Free Method for Using Intermediate Outputs as a Defense Mechanism Against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
Sungwon Han, Hyeonho Song, Sungwon Park, Meeyoung Cha
Federated learning combines local updates from clients to produce a global model, which is susceptible to poisoning attacks. Most previous defense strategies relied on vectors derived from projections of local updates on a Euclidean space; however, these methods fail to accurately represent the functionality and structure of local models, resulting in inconsistent performance. Here, we present a new paradigm to defend against poisoning attacks in federated learning using functional mappings of local models based on intermediate outputs. Experiments show that our mechanism is robust under a broad range of computing conditions and advanced attack scenarios, enabling safer collaboration among data-sensitive participants via federated learning.
Read more4/19/2024
📈
0
A Data-Driven Defense against Edge-case Model Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning
Kiran Purohit, Soumi Das, Sourangshu Bhattacharya, Santu Rana
Federated Learning systems are increasingly subjected to a multitude of model poisoning attacks from clients. Among these, edge-case attacks that target a small fraction of the input space are nearly impossible to detect using existing defenses, leading to a high attack success rate. We propose an effective defense using an external defense dataset, which provides information about the attack target. The defense dataset contains a mix of poisoned and clean examples, with only a few known to be clean. The proposed method, DataDefense, uses this dataset to learn a poisoned data detector model which marks each example in the defense dataset as poisoned or clean. It also learns a client importance model that estimates the probability of a client update being malicious. The global model is then updated as a weighted average of the client models' updates. The poisoned data detector and the client importance model parameters are updated using an alternating minimization strategy over the Federated Learning rounds. Extensive experiments on standard attack scenarios demonstrate that DataDefense can defend against model poisoning attacks where other state-of-the-art defenses fail. In particular, DataDefense is able to reduce the attack success rate by at least ~ 40% on standard attack setups and by more than 80% on some setups. Furthermore, DataDefense requires very few defense examples (as few as five) to achieve a near-optimal reduction in attack success rate.
Read more8/15/2024
🔎
0
Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense
Qilei Li, Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. However, FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning, which can deteriorate the performance of aggregated global model. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack. These methods also assume an attack happened moderately while is not always holds true in real. Consequently, these methods can significantly fail in terms of accuracy and robustness when detecting and addressing updates from attacked malicious clients. To overcome these challenges, in this work, we propose a simple yet effective framework to detect malicious clients, namely Confidence-Aware Defense (CAD), that utilizes the confidence scores of local models as criteria to evaluate the reliability of local updates. Our key insight is that malicious attacks, regardless of attack type, will cause the model to deviate from its previous state, thus leading to increased uncertainty when making predictions. Therefore, CAD is comprehensively effective for both model poisoning and data poisoning attacks by accurately identifying and mitigating potential malicious updates, even under varying degrees of attacks and data heterogeneity. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the robustness of FL systems against various types of attacks across various scenarios by achieving higher model accuracy and stability.
Read more8/20/2024
📈
0
FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks
Hyejun Jeong, Hamin Son, Seohu Lee, Jayun Hyun, Tai-Myoung Chung
Federated Learning, designed to address privacy concerns in learning models, introduces a new distributed paradigm that safeguards data privacy but differentiates the attack surface due to the server's inaccessibility to local datasets and the change in protection objective--parameters' integrity. Existing approaches, including robust aggregation algorithms, fail to effectively filter out malicious clients, especially those with non-Independently and Identically Distributed data. Furthermore, these approaches often tackle non-IID data and poisoning attacks separately. To address both challenges simultaneously, we present FedCC, a simple yet novel algorithm. It leverages the Centered Kernel Alignment similarity of Penultimate Layer Representations for clustering, allowing it to identify and filter out malicious clients by selectively averaging chosen parameters, even in non-IID data settings. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of FedCC in mitigating untargeted model poisoning and backdoor attacks. FedCC reduces the attack confidence to a consistent zero compared to existing outlier detection-based and first-order statistics-based methods. Specifically, it significantly minimizes the average degradation of global performance by 65.5%. We believe that this new perspective of assessing learning models makes it a valuable contribution to the field of FL model security and privacy. The code will be made available upon paper acceptance.
Read more6/7/2024