FightLadder: A Benchmark for Competitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces FightLadder, a new benchmark for evaluating competitive multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems.
- FightLadder simulates a ladder-style tournament, where artificial agents compete against each other in a series of one-on-one matches.
- The goal of the benchmark is to spur advancements in MARL by providing a standardized, competitive environment for developing and testing agents.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new testing ground for AI systems that can compete against each other in a tournament-style game. Called "FightLadder," this benchmark simulates a ladder-style competition where individual AI agents face off in a series of one-on-one matches. The purpose is to drive progress in the field of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) by giving researchers a standardized environment to develop and evaluate their competitive AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces FightLadder, a new benchmark for evaluating competitive multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems. FightLadder simulates a ladder-style tournament, where artificial agents compete against each other in a series of one-on-one matches. The goal is to spur advancements in MARL by providing a standardized, competitive environment for developing and testing agents.
The FightLadder environment consists of a set of pre-defined characters with varying abilities, which agents must learn to control and compete against each other. Agents accumulate wins and losses as they advance through the tournament ladder, and their performance is evaluated based on their final position. The authors demonstrate the usefulness of the benchmark by training several MARL agents on FightLadder and comparing their performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising benchmark for MARL research, but it also acknowledges several potential limitations. For example, the authors note that the pre-defined character abilities may limit the scope of strategies that agents can learn, and the tournament format may incentivize specific types of behavior that may not translate to real-world applications.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the computational and sample complexity required to train competitive agents on the FightLadder benchmark, which could be an important consideration for researchers with limited resources. Further research may be needed to explore the scalability and generalizability of the benchmark.
Conclusion
The FightLadder benchmark represents an important step forward in the field of MARL, providing a standardized, competitive environment for developing and evaluating AI systems. By simulating a ladder-style tournament, the benchmark encourages the creation of agents that can adapt and excel in dynamic, adversarial settings. While the benchmark has some limitations, it has the potential to spur significant advancements in multi-agent reinforcement learning and contribute to the development of more capable and versatile AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FightLadder: A Benchmark for Competitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Wenzhe Li, Zihan Ding, Seth Karten, Chi Jin
Recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL) heavily rely on a variety of well-designed benchmarks, which provide environmental platforms and consistent criteria to evaluate existing and novel algorithms. Specifically, in multi-agent RL (MARL), a plethora of benchmarks based on cooperative games have spurred the development of algorithms that improve the scalability of cooperative multi-agent systems. However, for the competitive setting, a lightweight and open-sourced benchmark with challenging gaming dynamics and visual inputs has not yet been established. In this work, we present FightLadder, a real-time fighting game platform, to empower competitive MARL research. Along with the platform, we provide implementations of state-of-the-art MARL algorithms for competitive games, as well as a set of evaluation metrics to characterize the performance and exploitability of agents. We demonstrate the feasibility of this platform by training a general agent that consistently defeats 12 built-in characters in single-player mode, and expose the difficulty of training a non-exploitable agent without human knowledge and demonstrations in two-player mode. FightLadder provides meticulously designed environments to address critical challenges in competitive MARL research, aiming to catalyze a new era of discovery and advancement in the field. Videos and code at https://sites.google.com/view/fightladder/home.
Read more6/26/2024
🏅
0
BenchMARL: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Matteo Bettini, Amanda Prorok, Vincent Moens
The field of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is currently facing a reproducibility crisis. While solutions for standardized reporting have been proposed to address the issue, we still lack a benchmarking tool that enables standardization and reproducibility, while leveraging cutting-edge Reinforcement Learning (RL) implementations. In this paper, we introduce BenchMARL, the first MARL training library created to enable standardized benchmarking across different algorithms, models, and environments. BenchMARL uses TorchRL as its backend, granting it high performance and maintained state-of-the-art implementations while addressing the broad community of MARL PyTorch users. Its design enables systematic configuration and reporting, thus allowing users to create and run complex benchmarks from simple one-line inputs. BenchMARL is open-sourced on GitHub: https://github.com/facebookresearch/BenchMARL
Read more7/8/2024
0
Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm using a cluster-synchronized laser network
Shun Kotoku, Takatomo Mihana, Andr'e Rohm, Ryoichi Horisaki
Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) studies crucial principles that are applicable to a variety of fields, including wireless networking and autonomous driving. We propose a photonic-based decision-making algorithm to address one of the most fundamental problems in MARL, called the competitive multi-armed bandit (CMAB) problem. Our numerical simulations demonstrate that chaotic oscillations and cluster synchronization of optically coupled lasers, along with our proposed decentralized coupling adjustment, efficiently balance exploration and exploitation while facilitating cooperative decision-making without explicitly sharing information among agents. Our study demonstrates how decentralized reinforcement learning can be achieved by exploiting complex physical processes controlled by simple algorithms.
Read more7/15/2024
💬
0
BattleAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Cooperation and Competition Capabilities of Language Models in Multi-Agent Systems
Wei Wang, Dan Zhang, Tao Feng, Boyan Wang, Jie Tang
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly powerful and capable of handling complex tasks, e.g., building single agents and multi-agent systems. Compared to single agents, multi-agent systems have higher requirements for the collaboration capabilities of language models. Many benchmarks are proposed to evaluate their collaborative abilities. However, these benchmarks lack fine-grained evaluations of LLM collaborative capabilities. Additionally, multi-agent collaborative and competitive scenarios are ignored in existing works. To address these two problems, we propose a benchmark, called BattleAgentBench, which defines seven sub-stages of three varying difficulty levels and conducts a fine-grained evaluation of language models in terms of single-agent scenario navigation capabilities, paired-agent task execution abilities, and multi-agent collaboration and competition capabilities. We conducted extensive evaluations on leading four closed-source and seven open-source models. Experimental results indicate that API-based models perform excellently on simple tasks but open-source small models struggle with simple tasks. Regarding difficult tasks that require collaborative and competitive abilities, although API-based models have demonstrated some collaborative capabilities, there is still enormous room for improvement.
Read more8/29/2024