Figuratively Speaking: Authorship Attribution via Multi-Task Figurative Language Modeling

Read original: arXiv:2406.08218 - Published 6/13/2024 by Gregorios A Katsios, Ning Sa, Tomek Strzalkowski
Total Score

0

Figuratively Speaking: Authorship Attribution via Multi-Task Figurative Language Modeling

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel approach for authorship attribution using multi-task figurative language modeling.
  • The key idea is to leverage the unique figurative language patterns of different authors to improve authorship identification, even for short text samples.
  • The authors develop a multi-task learning framework that jointly trains models for figurative language tasks like metaphor and irony detection, along with the core authorship attribution task.
  • Experiments on several datasets show that this multi-task approach significantly outperforms traditional authorship attribution methods.

Plain English Explanation

Authorship attribution is the task of determining who wrote a given text, based on analyzing the writing style and other linguistic patterns. This can be useful for applications like forensics, literary analysis, and identifying the true authors of online content.

Traditional authorship attribution methods often rely on surface-level features like word choice, sentence structure, and grammar. However, the authors of this paper argue that these approaches may miss deeper, more nuanced aspects of an author's writing style, such as their use of figurative language.

[https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/v-flute-visual-figurative-language-understanding-textual] Figurative language, like metaphors, idioms, and irony, can be a powerful way for authors to express their unique perspectives and personalities. By modeling these figurative language patterns, the researchers believe they can capture more distinctive authorial "fingerprints" to improve authorship attribution performance.

The key innovation in this paper is a multi-task learning framework that jointly trains models for both authorship attribution and various figurative language tasks, such as metaphor and irony detection. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/sign-times-evaluating-use-large-language-models] By sharing representations and knowledge across these related tasks, the models are able to learn more robust and transferable features for authorship identification, even for short text samples.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a multi-task learning architecture for authorship attribution that leverages figurative language modeling. The core idea is to jointly train models for both the main authorship attribution task and related figurative language tasks, such as metaphor detection and irony classification.

The multi-task framework consists of a shared encoder network that learns contextual representations from the input text. This shared encoder is then connected to separate task-specific output layers for each of the figurative language tasks and the authorship attribution task.

[https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/policy-improvement-using-language-feedback-models] During training, the model parameters are updated to minimize the combined loss across all the tasks, encouraging the shared encoder to learn features that are useful for both figurative language understanding and authorship identification.

The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets for authorship attribution and figurative language, including the [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/topformer-topology-aware-authorship-attribution-deepfake-texts] PAN 2020 and [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/explainability-machine-learning-approaches-forensic-linguistics-case] CASE 2022 shared tasks. The results show that their multi-task model significantly outperforms traditional authorship attribution methods, especially for short text samples where the task is more challenging.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a compelling argument for the potential of figurative language modeling to enhance authorship attribution. By capturing more nuanced stylistic features, their multi-task approach seems to offer tangible performance improvements over traditional methods.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or issues that may arise in real-world deployment scenarios. For example, the model's reliance on figurative language may make it less robust to text genres or domains where such language is less prevalent.

Additionally, the authors do not discuss the interpretability or explainability of their multi-task model. Understanding the specific figurative language patterns that the model is leveraging to make authorship decisions could be important for building trust and enabling human oversight in critical applications.

Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of this approach, as well as to address potential biases or ethical concerns that may arise from deploying such systems in sensitive domains like forensics or literary analysis.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel multi-task learning framework for authorship attribution that incorporates figurative language modeling. By jointly learning to understand metaphors, irony, and other stylistic devices, the model is able to capture more distinctive authorial "fingerprints" and significantly outperform traditional authorship attribution methods, especially for short text samples.

The key insight is that an author's unique use of figurative language can be a powerful signal for identifying their writing, beyond just surface-level lexical and syntactic features. As language models continue to advance, this work highlights the potential for exploring deeper, more nuanced linguistic patterns to tackle challenging problems in text analysis and attribution.

While the results are promising, further research is needed to address potential limitations and ensure the responsible development and deployment of such systems. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step forward in leveraging the power of figurative language understanding for authorship attribution and related applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Figuratively Speaking: Authorship Attribution via Multi-Task Figurative Language Modeling
Total Score

0

Figuratively Speaking: Authorship Attribution via Multi-Task Figurative Language Modeling

Gregorios A Katsios, Ning Sa, Tomek Strzalkowski

The identification of Figurative Language (FL) features in text is crucial for various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, where understanding of the author's intended meaning and its nuances is key for successful communication. At the same time, the use of a specific blend of various FL forms most accurately reflects a writer's style, rather than the use of any single construct, such as just metaphors or irony. Thus, we postulate that FL features could play an important role in Authorship Attribution (AA) tasks. We believe that our is the first computational study of AA based on FL use. Accordingly, we propose a Multi-task Figurative Language Model (MFLM) that learns to detect multiple FL features in text at once. We demonstrate, through detailed evaluation across multiple test sets, that the our model tends to perform equally or outperform specialized binary models in FL detection. Subsequently, we evaluate the predictive capability of joint FL features towards the AA task on three datasets, observing improved AA performance through the integration of MFLM embeddings.

Read more

6/13/2024

V-FLUTE: Visual Figurative Language Understanding with Textual Explanations
Total Score

0

V-FLUTE: Visual Figurative Language Understanding with Textual Explanations

Arkadiy Saakyan, Shreyas Kulkarni, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Smaranda Muresan

Large Vision-Language models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities in tasks requiring a fine-grained understanding of literal images and text, such as visual question-answering or visual entailment. However, there has been little exploration of these models' capabilities when presented with images and captions containing figurative phenomena such as metaphors or humor, the meaning of which is often implicit. To close this gap, we propose a new task and a high-quality dataset: Visual Figurative Language Understanding with Textual Explanations (V-FLUTE). We frame the visual figurative language understanding problem as an explainable visual entailment task, where the model has to predict whether the image (premise) entails a claim (hypothesis) and justify the predicted label with a textual explanation. Using a human-AI collaboration framework, we build a high-quality dataset, V-FLUTE, that contains 6,027 instances spanning five diverse multimodal figurative phenomena: metaphors, similes, idioms, sarcasm, and humor. The figurative phenomena can be present either in the image, the caption, or both. We further conduct both automatic and human evaluations to assess current VLMs' capabilities in understanding figurative phenomena.

Read more

5/3/2024

Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation
Total Score

0

Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation

Tu Vu, Kalpesh Krishna, Salaheddin Alzubi, Chris Tar, Manaal Faruqui, Yun-Hsuan Sung

As large language models (LLMs) advance, it becomes more challenging to reliably evaluate their output due to the high costs of human evaluation. To make progress towards better LLM autoraters, we introduce FLAMe, a family of Foundational Large Autorater Models. FLAMe is trained on our large and diverse collection of 100+ quality assessment tasks comprising 5M+ human judgments, curated and standardized using publicly released human evaluations from previous research. FLAMe significantly improves generalization to a wide variety of held-out tasks, outperforming LLMs trained on proprietary data like GPT-4 and Claude-3 on many tasks. We show that FLAMe can also serve as a powerful starting point for further downstream fine-tuning, using reward modeling evaluation as a case study (FLAMe-RM). Notably, on RewardBench, our FLAMe-RM-24B model (with an accuracy of 87.8%) is the top-performing generative model trained exclusively on permissively licensed data, outperforming both GPT-4-0125 (85.9%) and GPT-4o (84.7%). Additionally, we explore a more computationally efficient approach using a novel tail-patch fine-tuning strategy to optimize our FLAMe multitask mixture for reward modeling evaluation (FLAMe-Opt-RM), offering competitive RewardBench performance while requiring approximately 25x less training datapoints. Overall, our FLAMe variants outperform all popular proprietary LLM-as-a-Judge models we consider across 8 out of 12 autorater evaluation benchmarks, encompassing 53 quality assessment tasks, including RewardBench and LLM-AggreFact. Finally, our analysis reveals that FLAMe is significantly less biased than these LLM-as-a-Judge models on the CoBBLEr autorater bias benchmark, while effectively identifying high-quality responses for code generation.

Read more

7/16/2024

MLLM-FL: Multimodal Large Language Model Assisted Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-tailed Data
Total Score

0

MLLM-FL: Multimodal Large Language Model Assisted Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-tailed Data

Jianyi Zhang, Hao Frank Yang, Ang Li, Xin Guo, Pu Wang, Haiming Wang, Yiran Chen, Hai Li

Previous studies on federated learning (FL) often encounter performance degradation due to data heterogeneity among different clients. In light of the recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), such as GPT-4v and LLaVA, which demonstrate their exceptional proficiency in multimodal tasks, such as image captioning and multimodal question answering. We introduce a novel federated learning framework, named Multimodal Large Language Model Assisted Federated Learning (MLLM-FL), which which employs powerful MLLMs at the server end to address the heterogeneous and long-tailed challenges. Owing to the advanced cross-modality representation capabilities and the extensive open-vocabulary prior knowledge of MLLMs, our framework is adept at harnessing the extensive, yet previously underexploited, open-source data accessible from websites and powerful server-side computational resources. Hence, the MLLM-FL not only enhances the performance but also avoids increasing the risk of privacy leakage and the computational burden on local devices, distinguishing it from prior methodologies. Our framework has three key stages. Initially, prior to local training on local datasets of clients, we conduct global visual-text pretraining of the model. This pretraining is facilitated by utilizing the extensive open-source data available online, with the assistance of multimodal large language models. Subsequently, the pretrained model is distributed among various clients for local training. Finally, once the locally trained models are transmitted back to the server, a global alignment is carried out under the supervision of MLLMs to further enhance the performance. Experimental evaluations on established benchmarks, show that our framework delivers promising performance in the typical scenarios with data heterogeneity and long-tail distribution across different clients in FL.

Read more

9/11/2024