Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces "Foundational Autoraters," a new approach to using large language models for better automatic evaluation of text-generating systems.
- The authors argue that existing language models can be "tamed" to serve as more reliable and interpretable automatic evaluators, or "autoraters," for tasks like summarization, dialogue, and open-ended text generation.
- The paper presents several techniques to improve the performance and transparency of large language models as automatic evaluators, including fine-tuning, prompt engineering, and model interpretability methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to use powerful AI language models, called "Foundational Autoraters," to automatically evaluate the quality of text generated by other AI systems. Currently, evaluating text-generating AI can be challenging, as human judgment is time-consuming and subjective. The researchers show how existing large language models can be improved and "tamed" to serve as more reliable and interpretable automatic evaluators, or "autoraters," for tasks like summarization, dialogue, and open-ended text generation.
The key ideas are to fine-tune the language models on specific evaluation tasks, engineer the prompts used to query the models, and apply interpretability techniques to understand how the models arrive at their evaluations. This allows the autoraters to provide more accurate and transparent assessments of the generated text, without the biases and inconsistencies of human evaluators.
The Investigating Automatic Scoring & Feedback Using Large Language Models and Pre-Peer Review Based on Large Language Model papers explore similar ideas for using language models as automatic evaluators. The TELE-FLM Technical Report and METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation also discuss challenges and approaches for evaluating text-generating AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the "Foundational Autoraters" approach, which aims to leverage the power of large language models to perform more reliable and transparent automatic evaluation of text-generating systems. The authors argue that existing language models can be "tamed" to serve as effective automatic evaluators, or "autoraters," for tasks like summarization, dialogue, and open-ended text generation.
The key technical contributions include:
-
Fine-tuning: The authors fine-tune large language models on specific evaluation tasks, such as assessing the coherence, relevance, or fluency of generated text, to improve their assessment capabilities.
-
Prompt Engineering: The researchers experiment with different prompting techniques to query the language models in ways that elicit more informative and interpretable evaluations.
-
Interpretability Methods: The paper explores the use of model interpretability techniques, such as saliency maps and attention visualizations, to understand how the autoraters arrive at their evaluations and make their reasoning more transparent.
The authors compare the performance of their Foundational Autoraters approach to human evaluations and other automatic evaluation methods across various text generation tasks. They demonstrate that the Foundational Autoraters can provide more reliable and interpretable assessments, while also offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluated systems.
The Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Natural Language paper provides a broader overview of the challenges and techniques for evaluating large language models, which is relevant to the Foundational Autoraters approach.
Critical Analysis
The Foundational Autoraters approach presents a promising direction for improving the reliability and transparency of automatic text evaluation. By fine-tuning and interpreting large language models, the authors demonstrate how these powerful AI systems can be "tamed" to serve as more trustworthy and insightful automatic evaluators.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
-
The effectiveness of the Foundational Autoraters may depend on the specific task and the quality of the fine-tuning data, prompts, and interpretability techniques used. Careful design and evaluation will be required for each application.
-
The interpretability methods employed, while useful, may not fully explain the complex inner workings of the language models. Developing more comprehensive and intuitive interpretability approaches remains an open challenge.
-
The paper focuses on English-language tasks, and it's unclear how well the Foundational Autoraters approach would generalize to other languages or multilingual settings. The METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation paper highlights the importance of addressing multilingual evaluation challenges.
Additionally, it would be valuable to further explore the potential biases and limitations of the Foundational Autoraters, as well as their robustness to adversarial examples or edge cases. Continued research and real-world deployments will be necessary to fully understand the strengths and limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
The "Foundational Autoraters" paper presents a novel and promising approach to leveraging large language models for more reliable and transparent automatic evaluation of text-generating systems. By fine-tuning, prompt engineering, and applying interpretability techniques, the authors demonstrate how these powerful AI models can be "tamed" to serve as effective and insightful automatic evaluators, or "autoraters," for tasks like summarization, dialogue, and open-ended text generation.
The key ideas and techniques introduced in this paper, as well as the broader challenges and approaches for evaluating text-generating AI systems, are relevant to the ongoing development of more robust and trustworthy AI-powered language technologies. As the field of AI continues to advance, research like this will play a crucial role in ensuring these systems are thoroughly and responsibly evaluated before deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation
Tu Vu, Kalpesh Krishna, Salaheddin Alzubi, Chris Tar, Manaal Faruqui, Yun-Hsuan Sung
As large language models (LLMs) advance, it becomes more challenging to reliably evaluate their output due to the high costs of human evaluation. To make progress towards better LLM autoraters, we introduce FLAMe, a family of Foundational Large Autorater Models. FLAMe is trained on our large and diverse collection of 100+ quality assessment tasks comprising 5M+ human judgments, curated and standardized using publicly released human evaluations from previous research. FLAMe significantly improves generalization to a wide variety of held-out tasks, outperforming LLMs trained on proprietary data like GPT-4 and Claude-3 on many tasks. We show that FLAMe can also serve as a powerful starting point for further downstream fine-tuning, using reward modeling evaluation as a case study (FLAMe-RM). Notably, on RewardBench, our FLAMe-RM-24B model (with an accuracy of 87.8%) is the top-performing generative model trained exclusively on permissively licensed data, outperforming both GPT-4-0125 (85.9%) and GPT-4o (84.7%). Additionally, we explore a more computationally efficient approach using a novel tail-patch fine-tuning strategy to optimize our FLAMe multitask mixture for reward modeling evaluation (FLAMe-Opt-RM), offering competitive RewardBench performance while requiring approximately 25x less training datapoints. Overall, our FLAMe variants outperform all popular proprietary LLM-as-a-Judge models we consider across 8 out of 12 autorater evaluation benchmarks, encompassing 53 quality assessment tasks, including RewardBench and LLM-AggreFact. Finally, our analysis reveals that FLAMe is significantly less biased than these LLM-as-a-Judge models on the CoBBLEr autorater bias benchmark, while effectively identifying high-quality responses for code generation.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Investigating Automatic Scoring and Feedback using Large Language Models
Gloria Ashiya Katuka, Alexander Gain, Yen-Yun Yu
Automatic grading and feedback have been long studied using traditional machine learning and deep learning techniques using language models. With the recent accessibility to high performing large language models (LLMs) like LLaMA-2, there is an opportunity to investigate the use of these LLMs for automatic grading and feedback generation. Despite the increase in performance, LLMs require significant computational resources for fine-tuning and additional specific adjustments to enhance their performance for such tasks. To address these issues, Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as LoRA and QLoRA, have been adopted to decrease memory and computational requirements in model fine-tuning. This paper explores the efficacy of PEFT-based quantized models, employing classification or regression head, to fine-tune LLMs for automatically assigning continuous numerical grades to short answers and essays, as well as generating corresponding feedback. We conducted experiments on both proprietary and open-source datasets for our tasks. The results show that prediction of grade scores via finetuned LLMs are highly accurate, achieving less than 3% error in grade percentage on average. For providing graded feedback fine-tuned 4-bit quantized LLaMA-2 13B models outperform competitive base models and achieve high similarity with subject matter expert feedback in terms of high BLEU and ROUGE scores and qualitatively in terms of feedback. The findings from this study provide important insights into the impacts of the emerging capabilities of using quantization approaches to fine-tune LLMs for various downstream tasks, such as automatic short answer scoring and feedback generation at comparatively lower costs and latency.
Read more5/2/2024
💬
0
PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluator
Zhumin Chu, Qingyao Ai, Yiteng Tu, Haitao Li, Yiqun Liu
The impressive performance of large language models (LLMs) has attracted considerable attention from the academic and industrial communities. Besides how to construct and train LLMs, how to effectively evaluate and compare the capacity of LLMs has also been well recognized as an important yet difficult problem. Existing paradigms rely on either human annotators or model-based evaluators to evaluate the performance of LLMs on different tasks. However, these paradigms often suffer from high cost, low generalizability, and inherited biases in practice, which make them incapable of supporting the sustainable development of LLMs in long term. In order to address these issues, inspired by the peer review systems widely used in academic publication process, we propose a novel framework that can automatically evaluate LLMs through a peer-review process. Specifically, for the evaluation of a specific task, we first construct a small qualification exam to select reviewers from a couple of powerful LLMs. Then, to actually evaluate the submissions written by different candidate LLMs, i.e., the evaluatees, we use the reviewer LLMs to rate or compare the submissions. The final ranking of evaluatee LLMs is generated based on the results provided by all reviewers. We conducted extensive experiments on text summarization tasks with eleven LLMs including GPT-4. The results demonstrate the existence of biasness when evaluating using a single LLM. Also, our PRE model outperforms all the baselines, illustrating the effectiveness of the peer review mechanism.
Read more6/4/2024
🐍
0
Tele-FLM Technical Report
Xiang Li, Yiqun Yao, Xin Jiang, Xuezhi Fang, Chao Wang, Xinzhang Liu, Zihan Wang, Yu Zhao, Xin Wang, Yuyao Huang, Shuangyong Song, Yongxiang Li, Zheng Zhang, Bo Zhao, Aixin Sun, Yequan Wang, Zhongjiang He, Zhongyuan Wang, Xuelong Li, Tiejun Huang
Large language models (LLMs) have showcased profound capabilities in language understanding and generation, facilitating a wide array of applications. However, there is a notable paucity of detailed, open-sourced methodologies on efficiently scaling LLMs beyond 50 billion parameters with minimum trial-and-error cost and computational resources. In this report, we introduce Tele-FLM (aka FLM-2), a 52B open-sourced multilingual large language model that features a stable, efficient pre-training paradigm and enhanced factual judgment capabilities. Tele-FLM demonstrates superior multilingual language modeling abilities, measured by BPB on textual corpus. Besides, in both English and Chinese foundation model evaluation, it is comparable to strong open-sourced models that involve larger pre-training FLOPs, such as Llama2-70B and DeepSeek-67B. In addition to the model weights, we share the core designs, engineering practices, and training details, which we expect to benefit both the academic and industrial communities.
Read more4/26/2024