Finding Safety Neurons in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the concept of "safety neurons" in large language models (LLMs), which are neural network components that may be responsible for the models' safety-related behaviors.
- The researchers investigate whether it is possible to identify and understand these safety neurons, with the goal of improving the safety and alignment of LLMs.
- The paper presents a novel experimental approach and analysis techniques to uncover insights about the inner workings of LLMs and their safety-related properties.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, as these models become more capable, there are growing concerns about their safety and alignment with human values. The researchers in this paper hypothesize that there may be specific "safety neurons" within the neural networks of LLMs that are responsible for their safety-related behaviors, such as avoiding harmful or unethical outputs.
By understanding the nature and function of these safety neurons, the researchers aim to improve the overall safety and alignment of LLMs. They propose a novel experimental approach to identify and study these safety neurons, using techniques like neuron activation analysis and interpretability methods. The goal is to gain insights into how LLMs make decisions and incorporate safety considerations, which could lead to more transparent and controllable AI systems.
The findings of this research could have significant implications for the development of safe and ethical AI technologies, as outlined in related papers such as SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety, Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models, and Safety Alignment: A Vision for Language Models. By shedding light on the inner workings of LLMs, this research could help pave the way for more robust and trustworthy AI systems that can be deployed safely in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper explore the concept of "safety neurons" in large language models (LLMs), which are hypothesized to be neural network components responsible for the models' safety-related behaviors. To investigate this, they propose a novel experimental approach that combines neuron activation analysis, interpretability techniques, and probing methods.
The key elements of the paper's technical approach include:
-
Neuron Activation Analysis: The researchers analyze the activation patterns of individual neurons within the LLM's neural network, aiming to identify those that are specifically associated with safety-related outputs or behaviors.
-
Interpretability Methods: The team employs interpretability techniques, such as saliency maps and feature visualizations, to understand the role and significance of the identified safety neurons in the model's decision-making process.
-
Probing Experiments: The researchers design probing experiments to test the influence and causal relationship between the safety neurons and the LLM's safety-aligned outputs. This includes techniques like neuron ablation and feature attribution analysis.
Through these methods, the researchers aim to uncover insights about the inner workings of LLMs and their safety-related properties. The findings could have important implications for the development of more transparent, controllable, and aligned AI systems, as discussed in related papers like Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment in Large Language Models and MedSafetyBench: Evaluating and Improving Medical Safety in Large Language Models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to understanding the safety-related properties of large language models. By focusing on the concept of "safety neurons," the researchers aim to gain deeper insights into how LLMs make decisions and incorporate safety considerations.
One potential limitation of the study is the difficulty in definitively identifying and isolating the safety neurons within the complex neural networks of LLMs. The researchers acknowledge this challenge and propose a combination of techniques to address it, but there may still be inherent uncertainties and limitations in their approach.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential biases or blindspots in the safety-related behaviors of LLMs. It would be valuable to explore whether the identified safety neurons are truly aligned with human values or if they may be influenced by biases present in the training data or model architecture.
Further research is also needed to understand the generalizability of the findings across different LLM architectures and applications. The safety-related properties of LLMs may vary depending on the specific model, training process, and intended use case.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to develop safe and aligned AI systems. By shedding light on the inner workings of LLMs, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more transparent and controllable AI technologies that can be deployed with greater confidence in their safety and ethical behavior.
Conclusion
This paper explores the concept of "safety neurons" in large language models (LLMs), which are hypothesized to be neural network components responsible for the models' safety-related behaviors. The researchers propose a novel experimental approach that combines neuron activation analysis, interpretability techniques, and probing methods to uncover insights about the inner workings of LLMs and their safety-related properties.
The findings of this research could have significant implications for the development of safe and ethical AI technologies, as they could lead to more transparent, controllable, and aligned AI systems. By understanding the nature and function of safety neurons, researchers and developers can work towards building AI models that are better equipped to navigate complex ethical and safety considerations.
While the paper presents a promising approach, it also acknowledges the inherent challenges in definitively identifying and isolating safety neurons within the complex neural networks of LLMs. Further research is needed to address potential biases and blindspots, as well as to explore the generalizability of the findings across different LLM architectures and applications.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the quest to develop safe and aligned AI systems, as outlined in related papers such as SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety, Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models, and Safety Alignment: A Vision for Language Models. By continuing to explore the inner workings of LLMs, researchers can work towards building more robust and trustworthy AI systems that can be deployed safely in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Finding Safety Neurons in Large Language Models
Jianhui Chen, Xiaozhi Wang, Zijun Yao, Yushi Bai, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li
Large language models (LLMs) excel in various capabilities but also pose safety risks such as generating harmful content and misinformation, even after safety alignment. In this paper, we explore the inner mechanisms of safety alignment from the perspective of mechanistic interpretability, focusing on identifying and analyzing safety neurons within LLMs that are responsible for safety behaviors. We propose generation-time activation contrasting to locate these neurons and dynamic activation patching to evaluate their causal effects. Experiments on multiple recent LLMs show that: (1) Safety neurons are sparse and effective. We can restore $90$% safety performance with intervention only on about $5$% of all the neurons. (2) Safety neurons encode transferrable mechanisms. They exhibit consistent effectiveness on different red-teaming datasets. The finding of safety neurons also interprets alignment tax. We observe that the identified key neurons for safety and helpfulness significantly overlap, but they require different activation patterns of the shared neurons. Furthermore, we demonstrate an application of safety neurons in detecting unsafe outputs before generation. Our findings may promote further research on understanding LLM alignment. The source codes will be publicly released to facilitate future research.
Read more6/21/2024
🖼️
0
Nothing in Excess: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering
Zouying Cao, Yifei Yang, Hai Zhao
Safety alignment is indispensable for Large language models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions. However, recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue, limiting their helpfulness. In this paper, we propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns in aligned LLMs. First, SCANS extracts the refusal steering vectors within the activation space and utilizes vocabulary projection to anchor some specific safety-critical layers which influence model refusal behavior. Second, by tracking the hidden state transition, SCANS identifies the steering direction and steers the model behavior accordingly, achieving a balance between exaggerated safety and adequate safety. Experiments show that SCANS achieves new state-of-the-art performance on XSTest and OKTest benchmarks, without impairing their defense capability against harmful queries and maintaining almost unchanged model capability.
Read more8/22/2024
0
SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety with Small Language Models
Ohjoon Kwon, Donghyeon Jeon, Nayoung Choi, Gyu-Hwung Cho, Changbong Kim, Hyunwoo Lee, Inho Kang, Sun Kim, Taiwoo Park
Most prior safety research of large language models (LLMs) has focused on enhancing the alignment of LLMs to better suit the safety requirements of humans. However, internalizing such safeguard features into larger models brought challenges of higher training cost and unintended degradation of helpfulness. To overcome such challenges, a modular approach employing a smaller LLM to detect harmful user queries is regarded as a convenient solution in designing LLM-based system with safety requirements. In this paper, we leverage a smaller LLM for both harmful query detection and safeguard response generation. We introduce our safety requirements and the taxonomy of harmfulness categories, and then propose a multi-task learning mechanism fusing the two tasks into a single model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, providing on par or surpassing harmful query detection and safeguard response performance compared to the publicly available LLMs.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models
ShengYun Peng, Pin-Yu Chen, Matthew Hull, Duen Horng Chau
Safety alignment is the key to guiding the behaviors of large language models (LLMs) that are in line with human preferences and restrict harmful behaviors at inference time, but recent studies show that it can be easily compromised by finetuning with only a few adversarially designed training examples. We aim to measure the risks in finetuning LLMs through navigating the LLM safety landscape. We discover a new phenomenon observed universally in the model parameter space of popular open-source LLMs, termed as safety basin: randomly perturbing model weights maintains the safety level of the original aligned model in its local neighborhood. Our discovery inspires us to propose the new VISAGE safety metric that measures the safety in LLM finetuning by probing its safety landscape. Visualizing the safety landscape of the aligned model enables us to understand how finetuning compromises safety by dragging the model away from the safety basin. LLM safety landscape also highlights the system prompt's critical role in protecting a model, and that such protection transfers to its perturbed variants within the safety basin. These observations from our safety landscape research provide new insights for future work on LLM safety community.
Read more5/29/2024