Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenges of finetuning large language models (LLMs) to ensure their safety and reliability.
- The authors propose a framework for measuring and mitigating risks associated with finetuning LLMs on specific tasks or datasets.
- The research investigates factors that can lead to unintended behaviors or harmful outputs when LLMs are adapted for particular applications.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. While these models have many beneficial applications, there are also concerns about their potential for misuse or unintended consequences when adapted for specific tasks.
This paper presents a framework for evaluating the safety and reliability of finetuned LLMs. Finetuning refers to the process of further training an LLM on a particular dataset or task, which can change the model's behavior in unpredictable ways. The authors identify key risk factors, such as dataset biases, model architecture choices, and training procedures, that can lead to undesirable outcomes like generating toxic or misleading content.
By measuring these risk factors, the researchers aim to help developers and users of finetuned LLMs better understand the potential dangers and take appropriate steps to mitigate them. This could involve techniques like safety alignment vision language models, safe and responsible LLM development, or safety realignment through subspace-oriented models.
The goal is to navigate the complex "safety landscape" of LLM finetuning, ensuring that these powerful AI systems are deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner, especially in sensitive domains like medicine or comprehensive benchmarking.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for measuring and mitigating risks associated with finetuning large language models (LLMs) on specific tasks or datasets. The authors identify several key risk factors that can lead to unintended behaviors or harmful outputs when LLMs are adapted for particular applications:
- Dataset Biases: The dataset used to finetune the LLM may contain biases, stereotypes, or misinformation that can be reflected in the model's outputs.
- Model Architecture Choices: The choice of LLM architecture and hyperparameters can impact the model's behavior and safety properties.
- Training Procedures: The way the LLM is finetuned, such as the loss function, optimization algorithm, or amount of training data, can also affect the model's reliability and safety.
To quantify these risks, the authors develop a set of metrics and evaluation procedures that can be used to assess the potential dangers of a finetuned LLM. This includes measures of language model safety, alignment with desired behaviors, and robustness to adversarial inputs.
The researchers then demonstrate the application of their framework on several case studies, where they finetune LLMs on different tasks and datasets and evaluate the resulting models' safety and reliability. The findings highlight the importance of carefully considering the risks and taking appropriate mitigating actions when deploying finetuned LLMs, especially in sensitive domains.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on ensuring the safety and responsibility of large language models. By proposing a comprehensive framework for measuring and mitigating the risks associated with LLM finetuning, the authors address a crucial challenge in the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
One potential limitation of the research is the scope of the case studies presented. While the authors demonstrate the application of their framework on several examples, the generalizability of the findings to a wider range of finetuning tasks and datasets remains to be explored. Additionally, the paper does not extensively discuss the computational and resource requirements of the proposed risk assessment methods, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployment.
Furthermore, the paper's focus on the technical aspects of LLM finetuning safety may not fully capture the broader societal implications and ethical considerations. Issues such as model transparency, algorithmic bias, and the potential for misuse or unintended consequences deserve further exploration.
Overall, the research presented in this paper provides a valuable framework for developers and researchers to navigate the complex safety landscape of LLM finetuning. By continuing to refine and expand upon this work, the field can work towards ensuring that these powerful AI systems are deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive framework for measuring and mitigating the risks associated with finetuning large language models (LLMs) on specific tasks or datasets. The authors identify key risk factors, such as dataset biases, model architecture choices, and training procedures, that can lead to unintended behaviors or harmful outputs when LLMs are adapted for particular applications.
By developing a set of metrics and evaluation procedures to assess the potential dangers of finetuned LLMs, the researchers aim to help developers and users better understand and address the safety challenges in this rapidly evolving field. The application of this framework on several case studies highlights the importance of carefully considering the risks and taking appropriate mitigating actions when deploying finetuned LLMs, especially in sensitive domains like medicine or comprehensive AI benchmarking.
As the use of LLMs continues to grow, this work contributes to the ongoing efforts to ensure the responsible and beneficial development of these powerful AI systems, navigating the complex "safety landscape" to unlock their full potential while mitigating unintended consequences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models
ShengYun Peng, Pin-Yu Chen, Matthew Hull, Duen Horng Chau
Safety alignment is the key to guiding the behaviors of large language models (LLMs) that are in line with human preferences and restrict harmful behaviors at inference time, but recent studies show that it can be easily compromised by finetuning with only a few adversarially designed training examples. We aim to measure the risks in finetuning LLMs through navigating the LLM safety landscape. We discover a new phenomenon observed universally in the model parameter space of popular open-source LLMs, termed as safety basin: randomly perturbing model weights maintains the safety level of the original aligned model in its local neighborhood. Our discovery inspires us to propose the new VISAGE safety metric that measures the safety in LLM finetuning by probing its safety landscape. Visualizing the safety landscape of the aligned model enables us to understand how finetuning compromises safety by dragging the model away from the safety basin. LLM safety landscape also highlights the system prompt's critical role in protecting a model, and that such protection transfers to its perturbed variants within the safety basin. These observations from our safety landscape research provide new insights for future work on LLM safety community.
Read more5/29/2024
👀
0
Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language Models
Yongshuo Zong, Ondrej Bohdal, Tingyang Yu, Yongxin Yang, Timothy Hospedales
Current vision large language models (VLLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities yet are prone to generate harmful content and are vulnerable to even the simplest jailbreaking attacks. Our initial analysis finds that this is due to the presence of harmful data during vision-language instruction fine-tuning, and that VLLM fine-tuning can cause forgetting of safety alignment previously learned by the underpinning LLM. To address this issue, we first curate a vision-language safe instruction-following dataset VLGuard covering various harmful categories. Our experiments demonstrate that integrating this dataset into standard vision-language fine-tuning or utilizing it for post-hoc fine-tuning effectively safety aligns VLLMs. This alignment is achieved with minimal impact on, or even enhancement of, the models' helpfulness. The versatility of our safety fine-tuning dataset makes it a valuable resource for safety-testing existing VLLMs, training new models or safeguarding pre-trained VLLMs. Empirical results demonstrate that fine-tuned VLLMs effectively reject unsafe instructions and substantially reduce the success rates of several black-box adversarial attacks, which approach zero in many cases. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/ys-zong/VLGuard.
Read more6/19/2024
🔍
0
What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? Mechanistic Study
Samyak Jain, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Kemal Oksuz, Tom Joy, Philip H. S. Torr, Amartya Sanyal, Puneet K. Dokania
Safety fine-tuning helps align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences for their safe deployment. To better understand the underlying factors that make models safe via safety fine-tuning, we design a synthetic data generation framework that captures salient aspects of an unsafe input by modeling the interaction between the task the model is asked to perform (e.g., design) versus the specific concepts the task is asked to be performed upon (e.g., a cycle vs. a bomb). Using this, we investigate three well-known safety fine-tuning methods -- supervised safety fine-tuning, direct preference optimization, and unlearning -- and provide significant evidence demonstrating that these methods minimally transform MLP weights to specifically align unsafe inputs into its weights' null space. This yields a clustering of inputs based on whether the model deems them safe or not. Correspondingly, when an adversarial input (e.g., a jailbreak) is provided, its activations are closer to safer samples, leading to the model processing such an input as if it were safe. We validate our findings, wherever possible, on real-world models -- specifically, Llama-2 7B and Llama-3 8B.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Safety Layers of Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Security
Shen Li, Liuyi Yao, Lan Zhang, Yaliang Li
Aligned LLMs are highly secure, capable of recognizing and refusing to answer malicious questions. However, the role of internal parameters in maintaining this security is not well understood, further these models are vulnerable to security degradation when fine-tuned with non-malicious backdoor data or normal data. To address these challenges, our work uncovers the mechanism behind security in aligned LLMs at the parameter level, identifying a small set of contiguous layers in the middle of the model that are crucial for distinguishing malicious queries from normal ones, referred to as safety layers. We first confirm the existence of these safety layers by analyzing variations in input vectors within the model's internal layers. Additionally, we leverage the over-rejection phenomenon and parameters scaling analysis to precisely locate the safety layers. Building on this understanding, we propose a novel fine-tuning approach, Safely Partial-Parameter Fine-Tuning (SPPFT), that fixes the gradient of the safety layers during fine-tuning to address the security degradation. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach significantly preserves model security while maintaining performance and reducing computational resources compared to full fine-tuning.
Read more9/2/2024