On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved Analysis

2301.00712

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/15/2024 by Lesi Chen, Jing Xu, Jingzhao Zhang

🀯

Abstract

Bilevel optimization reveals the inner structure of otherwise oblique optimization problems, such as hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture search, and meta-learning. A common goal in bilevel optimization is to minimize a hyper-objective that implicitly depends on the solution set of the lower-level function. Although this hyper-objective approach is widely used, its theoretical properties have not been thoroughly investigated in cases where the lower-level functions lack strong convexity. In this work, we first provide hardness results to show that the goal of finding stationary points of the hyper-objective for nonconvex-convex bilevel optimization can be intractable for zero-respecting algorithms. Then we study a class of tractable nonconvex-nonconvex bilevel problems when the lower-level function satisfies the Polyak-{L}ojasiewicz (PL) condition. We show a simple first-order algorithm can achieve better complexity bounds of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-2})$, $tilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-4})$ and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-6})$ in the deterministic, partially stochastic, and fully stochastic setting respectively.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Bilevel optimization is a technique used to solve complex optimization problems, such as hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture search, and meta-learning.
  • In bilevel optimization, the goal is to minimize a "hyper-objective" that depends on the solution set of a lower-level function.
  • This paper investigates the theoretical properties of bilevel optimization when the lower-level function lacks strong convexity.

Plain English Explanation

Bilevel optimization is a way to solve complex optimization problems that have two levels. The top-level problem is the "hyper-objective," which depends on the solution to the bottom-level problem.

For example, imagine you're trying to tune the hyperparameters of a machine learning model. The top-level problem would be to find the best hyperparameters to minimize the model's overall error. The bottom-level problem would be to train the model using those hyperparameters and measure its performance.

This paper looks at what happens when the bottom-level problem is not convex, meaning it has multiple local minima. The authors show that in some cases, finding a good solution for the top-level problem can be very difficult. However, they also identify a class of problems where a simple algorithm can efficiently find a good solution, even when the bottom-level problem is non-convex.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides hardness results to show that finding stationary points of the hyper-objective for non-convex-convex bilevel optimization can be intractable for certain algorithms.

It then studies a class of tractable non-convex-non-convex bilevel problems where the lower-level function satisfies the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) condition. The authors show that a simple first-order algorithm can achieve better complexity bounds in the deterministic, partially stochastic, and fully stochastic settings.

Specifically, the algorithm can achieve $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-2})$, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-4})$ and $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-6})$ complexity bounds, respectively, where $\epsilon$ represents the desired accuracy.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable theoretical insights into the challenges of bilevel optimization, particularly when the lower-level problem lacks strong convexity. The hardness results highlight the inherent difficulty of these problems, which is important for setting appropriate expectations and guiding future research.

However, the analysis is limited to a specific class of bilevel problems satisfying the Polyak-Łojasiewicz condition. It would be interesting to see if the proposed algorithm can be extended to a broader range of non-convex bilevel problems or if there are other efficient algorithms for these more general cases.

Additionally, the paper does not provide any empirical validation of the proposed algorithm, which would help demonstrate its practical applicability and performance compared to other bilevel optimization methods. Empirical studies or real-world case studies could further strengthen the impact of this work.

Conclusion

This paper provides important theoretical insights into the challenges of bilevel optimization, particularly when the lower-level problem lacks strong convexity. The authors identify a class of tractable non-convex-non-convex bilevel problems and propose a simple first-order algorithm that can achieve efficient complexity bounds.

While the analysis is limited to a specific problem class, the results highlight the value of studying the theoretical properties of bilevel optimization and the potential for developing effective algorithms to solve these complex problems. Further research and empirical validation could lead to significant advancements in areas like hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture search, and meta-learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

An Accelerated Gradient Method for Convex Smooth Simple Bilevel Optimization

An Accelerated Gradient Method for Convex Smooth Simple Bilevel Optimization

Jincheng Cao, Ruichen Jiang, Erfan Yazdandoost Hamedani, Aryan Mokhtari

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this paper, we focus on simple bilevel optimization problems, where we minimize a convex smooth objective function over the optimal solution set of another convex smooth constrained optimization problem. We present a novel bilevel optimization method that locally approximates the solution set of the lower-level problem using a cutting plane approach and employs an accelerated gradient-based update to reduce the upper-level objective function over the approximated solution set. We measure the performance of our method in terms of suboptimality and infeasibility errors and provide non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for both error criteria. Specifically, when the feasible set is compact, we show that our method requires at most $mathcal{O}(max{1/sqrt{epsilon_{f}}, 1/epsilon_g})$ iterations to find a solution that is $epsilon_f$-suboptimal and $epsilon_g$-infeasible. Moreover, under the additional assumption that the lower-level objective satisfies the $r$-th Holderian error bound, we show that our method achieves an iteration complexity of $mathcal{O}(max{epsilon_{f}^{-frac{2r-1}{2r}},epsilon_{g}^{-frac{2r-1}{2r}}})$, which matches the optimal complexity of single-level convex constrained optimization when $r=1$.

Read more

6/3/2024

Bilevel reinforcement learning via the development of hyper-gradient without lower-level convexity

Bilevel reinforcement learning via the development of hyper-gradient without lower-level convexity

Yan Yang, Bin Gao, Ya-xiang Yuan

YC

0

Reddit

0

Bilevel reinforcement learning (RL), which features intertwined two-level problems, has attracted growing interest recently. The inherent non-convexity of the lower-level RL problem is, however, to be an impediment to developing bilevel optimization methods. By employing the fixed point equation associated with the regularized RL, we characterize the hyper-gradient via fully first-order information, thus circumventing the assumption of lower-level convexity. This, remarkably, distinguishes our development of hyper-gradient from the general AID-based bilevel frameworks since we take advantage of the specific structure of RL problems. Moreover, we propose both model-based and model-free bilevel reinforcement learning algorithms, facilitated by access to the fully first-order hyper-gradient. Both algorithms are provable to enjoy the convergence rate $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-1})$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that AID-based bilevel RL gets rid of additional assumptions on the lower-level problem. In addition, numerical experiments demonstrate that the hyper-gradient indeed serves as an integration of exploitation and exploration.

Read more

5/31/2024

πŸ› οΈ

Functional Bilevel Optimization for Machine Learning

Ieva Petrulionyte, Julien Mairal, Michael Arbel

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this paper, we introduce a new functional point of view on bilevel optimization problems for machine learning, where the inner objective is minimized over a function space. These types of problems are most often solved by using methods developed in the parametric setting, where the inner objective is strongly convex with respect to the parameters of the prediction function. The functional point of view does not rely on this assumption and notably allows using over-parameterized neural networks as the inner prediction function. We propose scalable and efficient algorithms for the functional bilevel optimization problem and illustrate the benefits of our approach on instrumental regression and reinforcement learning tasks.

Read more

6/14/2024

First-Order Methods for Linearly Constrained Bilevel Optimization

First-Order Methods for Linearly Constrained Bilevel Optimization

Guy Kornowski, Swati Padmanabhan, Kai Wang, Zhe Zhang, Suvrit Sra

YC

0

Reddit

0

Algorithms for bilevel optimization often encounter Hessian computations, which are prohibitive in high dimensions. While recent works offer first-order methods for unconstrained bilevel problems, the constrained setting remains relatively underexplored. We present first-order linearly constrained optimization methods with finite-time hypergradient stationarity guarantees. For linear equality constraints, we attain $epsilon$-stationarity in $widetilde{O}(epsilon^{-2})$ gradient oracle calls, which is nearly-optimal. For linear inequality constraints, we attain $(delta,epsilon)$-Goldstein stationarity in $widetilde{O}(d{delta^{-1} epsilon^{-3}})$ gradient oracle calls, where $d$ is the upper-level dimension. Finally, we obtain for the linear inequality setting dimension-free rates of $widetilde{O}({delta^{-1} epsilon^{-4}})$ oracle complexity under the additional assumption of oracle access to the optimal dual variable. Along the way, we develop new nonsmooth nonconvex optimization methods with inexact oracles. We verify these guarantees with preliminary numerical experiments.

Read more

6/19/2024