First-Order Methods for Linearly Constrained Bilevel Optimization
2406.12771
0
0
Abstract
Algorithms for bilevel optimization often encounter Hessian computations, which are prohibitive in high dimensions. While recent works offer first-order methods for unconstrained bilevel problems, the constrained setting remains relatively underexplored. We present first-order linearly constrained optimization methods with finite-time hypergradient stationarity guarantees. For linear equality constraints, we attain $epsilon$-stationarity in $widetilde{O}(epsilon^{-2})$ gradient oracle calls, which is nearly-optimal. For linear inequality constraints, we attain $(delta,epsilon)$-Goldstein stationarity in $widetilde{O}(d{delta^{-1} epsilon^{-3}})$ gradient oracle calls, where $d$ is the upper-level dimension. Finally, we obtain for the linear inequality setting dimension-free rates of $widetilde{O}({delta^{-1} epsilon^{-4}})$ oracle complexity under the additional assumption of oracle access to the optimal dual variable. Along the way, we develop new nonsmooth nonconvex optimization methods with inexact oracles. We verify these guarantees with preliminary numerical experiments.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents first-order methods for solving linearly constrained bilevel optimization problems, where the upper-level problem is optimized subject to the lower-level problem being solved optimally.
- The authors propose two algorithms: a primal-dual method and a primal method, both of which leverage first-order information to efficiently solve these challenging optimization problems.
- The paper includes theoretical guarantees on the convergence rates of the proposed methods, as well as experimental results demonstrating their effectiveness on a variety of problem instances.
Plain English Explanation
Bilevel optimization is a type of mathematical problem where there are two levels of optimization happening at the same time. The upper-level problem is trying to find the best solution, but it is constrained by the lower-level problem also being solved optimally. This can be challenging to solve, especially when the problems have linear constraints.
The authors of this paper have developed two new algorithms to tackle these types of bilevel optimization problems. The first is a "primal-dual" method, which means it looks at both the main problem and the constraints at the same time. The second is a "primal" method, which focuses only on the main problem and tries to find the best solution.
Both of these algorithms use "first-order" information, which means they look at the slope or gradient of the problem to guide their search for the optimal solution. The authors have proven that these methods can converge, or get close to the best solution, at a reasonable rate. They have also tested the algorithms on a variety of examples and shown that they work well in practice.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents two first-order methods for solving linearly constrained bilevel optimization problems. The first is a primal-dual method that jointly optimizes the upper-level and lower-level objective functions, while also satisfying the linear constraints. The second is a primal method that focuses solely on the upper-level objective, while using a projection step to ensure the linear constraints are satisfied.
Both algorithms leverage first-order information, in the form of gradients, to efficiently navigate the optimization landscape. The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence rates of these methods, showing that they can achieve sublinear or linear convergence, depending on the problem structure.
The paper also includes extensive numerical experiments, where the proposed algorithms are tested on a variety of problem instances, including those with and properties. The results demonstrate the practical effectiveness of the methods, particularly in terms of computational efficiency and solution quality.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study of first-order methods for linearly constrained bilevel optimization. The theoretical analysis is rigorous, and the numerical experiments are extensive and thoughtfully constructed.
One potential limitation of the work is that it focuses solely on linearly constrained problems. While this class of problems is important, there are many real-world applications that involve nonlinear constraints or more complex bilevel structures. It would be valuable to see how the proposed methods could be extended to handle these more general settings.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much discussion of the practical challenges that may arise when implementing these algorithms, such as the choice of step sizes, the handling of numerical errors, or the scalability to large-scale problems. A more detailed treatment of these implementation aspects would help readers better understand the practical tradeoffs and limitations of the proposed approaches.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of bilevel optimization by introducing new first-order methods and providing a strong theoretical and empirical foundation for their use. Future research could build upon this work to address some of the limitations and expand the applicability of these techniques to a wider range of optimization problems.
Conclusion
This paper presents two new first-order methods for solving linearly constrained bilevel optimization problems. The proposed algorithms, a primal-dual method and a primal method, leverage gradient information to efficiently navigate the optimization landscape and converge to optimal solutions.
The theoretical analysis and numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques, particularly in terms of computational efficiency and solution quality. While the focus is on linearly constrained problems, the insights and approaches developed in this work could serve as a foundation for addressing more general bilevel optimization challenges in the future.
As the field of bilevel optimization continues to grow in importance, with applications ranging from machine learning to engineering design, the contributions of this paper will be valuable for researchers and practitioners seeking to solve these complex, nested optimization problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved Analysis
Lesi Chen, Jing Xu, Jingzhao Zhang
0
0
Bilevel optimization reveals the inner structure of otherwise oblique optimization problems, such as hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture search, and meta-learning. A common goal in bilevel optimization is to minimize a hyper-objective that implicitly depends on the solution set of the lower-level function. Although this hyper-objective approach is widely used, its theoretical properties have not been thoroughly investigated in cases where the lower-level functions lack strong convexity. In this work, we first provide hardness results to show that the goal of finding stationary points of the hyper-objective for nonconvex-convex bilevel optimization can be intractable for zero-respecting algorithms. Then we study a class of tractable nonconvex-nonconvex bilevel problems when the lower-level function satisfies the Polyak-{L}ojasiewicz (PL) condition. We show a simple first-order algorithm can achieve better complexity bounds of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-2})$, $tilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-4})$ and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-6})$ in the deterministic, partially stochastic, and fully stochastic setting respectively.
5/15/2024
An Accelerated Gradient Method for Convex Smooth Simple Bilevel Optimization
Jincheng Cao, Ruichen Jiang, Erfan Yazdandoost Hamedani, Aryan Mokhtari
0
0
In this paper, we focus on simple bilevel optimization problems, where we minimize a convex smooth objective function over the optimal solution set of another convex smooth constrained optimization problem. We present a novel bilevel optimization method that locally approximates the solution set of the lower-level problem using a cutting plane approach and employs an accelerated gradient-based update to reduce the upper-level objective function over the approximated solution set. We measure the performance of our method in terms of suboptimality and infeasibility errors and provide non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for both error criteria. Specifically, when the feasible set is compact, we show that our method requires at most $mathcal{O}(max{1/sqrt{epsilon_{f}}, 1/epsilon_g})$ iterations to find a solution that is $epsilon_f$-suboptimal and $epsilon_g$-infeasible. Moreover, under the additional assumption that the lower-level objective satisfies the $r$-th Holderian error bound, we show that our method achieves an iteration complexity of $mathcal{O}(max{epsilon_{f}^{-frac{2r-1}{2r}},epsilon_{g}^{-frac{2r-1}{2r}}})$, which matches the optimal complexity of single-level convex constrained optimization when $r=1$.
6/3/2024
🛠️
Explicit Second-Order Min-Max Optimization Methods with Optimal Convergence Guarantee
Tianyi Lin, Panayotis Mertikopoulos, Michael I. Jordan
0
0
We propose and analyze several inexact regularized Newton-type methods for finding a global saddle point of emph{convex-concave} unconstrained min-max optimization problems. Compared to first-order methods, our understanding of second-order methods for min-max optimization is relatively limited, as obtaining global rates of convergence with second-order information is much more involved. In this paper, we examine how second-order information can be used to speed up extra-gradient methods, even under inexactness. Specifically, we show that the proposed methods generate iterates that remain within a bounded set and that the averaged iterates converge to an $epsilon$-saddle point within $O(epsilon^{-2/3})$ iterations in terms of a restricted gap function. This matched the theoretically established lower bound in this context. We also provide a simple routine for solving the subproblem at each iteration, requiring a single Schur decomposition and $O(loglog(1/epsilon))$ calls to a linear system solver in a quasi-upper-triangular system. Thus, our method improves the existing line-search-based second-order min-max optimization methods by shaving off an $O(loglog(1/epsilon))$ factor in the required number of Schur decompositions. Finally, we present numerical experiments on synthetic and real data that demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methods.
4/24/2024
Accelerated Stochastic Min-Max Optimization Based on Bias-corrected Momentum
Haoyuan Cai, Sulaiman A. Alghunaim, Ali H. Sayed
0
0
Lower-bound analyses for nonconvex strongly-concave minimax optimization problems have shown that stochastic first-order algorithms require at least $mathcal{O}(varepsilon^{-4})$ oracle complexity to find an $varepsilon$-stationary point. Some works indicate that this complexity can be improved to $mathcal{O}(varepsilon^{-3})$ when the loss gradient is Lipschitz continuous. The question of achieving enhanced convergence rates under distinct conditions, remains unresolved. In this work, we address this question for optimization problems that are nonconvex in the minimization variable and strongly concave or Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) in the maximization variable. We introduce novel bias-corrected momentum algorithms utilizing efficient Hessian-vector products. We establish convergence conditions and demonstrate a lower iteration complexity of $mathcal{O}(varepsilon^{-3})$ for the proposed algorithms. The effectiveness of the method is validated through applications to robust logistic regression using real-world datasets.
6/21/2024