Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random

Read original: arXiv:2405.15403 - Published 5/27/2024 by Mingming Ha, Xuewen Tao, Wenfang Lin, Qionxu Ma, Wujiang Xu, Linxun Chen

🛠️

Overview

This paper presents a fine-grained dynamic framework for jointly optimizing bias and variance in machine learning models when dealing with data that is missing not at random (MNAR).
The framework leverages different estimators (naive, EIB, IPS, and DR) to address the challenges of MNAR data and provide a principled approach for balancing bias and variance.
The paper derives the bias and variance expressions for each estimator and examines the tradeoffs between them, offering insights to guide model selection and hyperparameter tuning.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a common challenge in machine learning: dealing with data that is missing in a way that's not random. This is known as data missing not at random (MNAR), and it can introduce biases into your models that are hard to correct.

To address this, the researchers developed a flexible framework that allows you to jointly optimize the bias and variance of your models. This means you can find the right balance between accuracy (low bias) and stability (low variance) when working with MNAR data.

The framework uses different estimation techniques, like the naive estimator, EIB, IPS, and DR. Each of these has its own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to bias and variance. The paper goes through the math to show how these estimators perform, helping you understand the tradeoffs involved in choosing one over the others.

By having a principled way to navigate the bias-variance tradeoff for MNAR data, this work can help machine learning practitioners build more robust and reliable models, even when the data has some gaps or is missing in a non-random way. [This relates to the work on robust design and evaluation and dealing with distributional shifts.]

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a fine-grained dynamic framework for jointly optimizing the bias and variance of machine learning models in the presence of data that is missing not at random (MNAR). The key contributions are:

Deriving the bias and variance expressions for four different estimators - the naive estimator, Empirical Inverse Probability (EIB), Inverse Propensity Score (IPS), and Doubly Robust (DR) - that can be used to handle MNAR data. [This relates to the work on bias-variance decomposition.]
Analyzing the tradeoffs between bias and variance for each estimator, providing insights to guide model selection and hyperparameter tuning.
Investigating the phenomenon of unbounded variance, which can occur with certain estimators under MNAR conditions, and proposing solutions to mitigate this issue.

The framework allows practitioners to systematically explore the bias-variance tradeoff when dealing with MNAR data, leveraging different estimators to find the right balance for their specific application. This can lead to more accurate and stable models, even in the face of complex missing data patterns. [The ideas in this paper connect to research on causal inference from heterogeneous environments and Bayesian perspectives on adaptivity.]

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and theoretically grounded approach to addressing the bias-variance tradeoff for MNAR data. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The theoretical analysis assumes access to the true propensity scores, which may not be realistic in practice. Exploring methods for estimating these scores from data could further enhance the framework's applicability.
The paper focuses on point estimation, but some applications may require quantifying uncertainty through interval estimates or uncertainty quantification. Extending the framework to handle these needs could broaden its usefulness.
The experiments are conducted on synthetic data, which, while useful for isolating the effects of MNAR, may not fully capture the complexities of real-world datasets. Validating the framework on diverse real-world benchmarks would increase confidence in its practical value.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of machine learning by providing a principled approach to addressing the bias-variance tradeoff in the presence of MNAR data. Further research building on these ideas could lead to even more robust and reliable machine learning models.

Conclusion

This paper presents a fine-grained dynamic framework for jointly optimizing the bias and variance of machine learning models when dealing with data that is missing not at random (MNAR). By deriving the bias and variance expressions for different estimators and analyzing their tradeoffs, the framework offers a principled way for practitioners to navigate the bias-variance tradeoff and build more accurate and stable models.

The insights from this work can help advance the state of the art in machine learning, particularly in domains where data quality and reliability are critical, such as healthcare, finance, and safety-critical applications. By equipping researchers and engineers with a better understanding of how to handle complex missing data patterns, this framework has the potential to drive significant improvements in the robustness and real-world performance of predictive models.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random

Mingming Ha, Xuewen Tao, Wenfang Lin, Qionxu Ma, Wujiang Xu, Linxun Chen

In most practical applications such as recommendation systems, display advertising, and so forth, the collected data often contains missing values and those missing values are generally missing-not-at-random, which deteriorates the prediction performance of models. Some existing estimators and regularizers attempt to achieve unbiased estimation to improve the predictive performance. However, variances and generalization bound of these methods are generally unbounded when the propensity scores tend to zero, compromising their stability and robustness. In this paper, we first theoretically reveal that limitations of regularization techniques. Besides, we further illustrate that, for more general estimators, unbiasedness will inevitably lead to unbounded variance. These general laws inspire us that the estimator designs is not merely about eliminating bias, reducing variance, or simply achieve a bias-variance trade-off. Instead, it involves a quantitative joint optimization of bias and variance. Then, we develop a systematic fine-grained dynamic learning framework to jointly optimize bias and variance, which adaptively selects an appropriate estimator for each user-item pair according to the predefined objective function. With this operation, the generalization bounds and variances of models are reduced and bounded with theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments are conducted to verify the theoretical results and the effectiveness of the proposed dynamic learning framework.

5/27/2024

Fairness-Aware Estimation of Graphical Models

Zhuoping Zhou, Davoud Ataee Tarzanagh, Bojian Hou, Qi Long, Li Shen

This paper examines the issue of fairness in the estimation of graphical models (GMs), particularly Gaussian, Covariance, and Ising models. These models play a vital role in understanding complex relationships in high-dimensional data. However, standard GMs can result in biased outcomes, especially when the underlying data involves sensitive characteristics or protected groups. To address this, we introduce a comprehensive framework designed to reduce bias in the estimation of GMs related to protected attributes. Our approach involves the integration of the pairwise graph disparity error and a tailored loss function into a nonsmooth multi-objective optimization problem, striving to achieve fairness across different sensitive groups while maintaining the effectiveness of the GMs. Experimental evaluations on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our framework effectively mitigates bias without undermining GMs' performance.

9/2/2024

Robust portfolio optimization for recommender systems considering uncertainty of estimated statistics

Tomoya Yanagi, Shunnosuke Ikeda, Yuichi Takano

This paper is concerned with portfolio optimization models for creating high-quality lists of recommended items to balance the accuracy and diversity of recommendations. However, the statistics (i.e., expectation and covariance of ratings) required for mean--variance portfolio optimization are subject to inevitable estimation errors. To remedy this situation, we focus on robust optimization techniques that derive reliable solutions to uncertain optimization problems. Specifically, we propose a robust portfolio optimization model that copes with the uncertainty of estimated statistics based on the cardinality-based uncertainty sets. This robust portfolio optimization model can be reduced to a mixed-integer linear optimization problem, which can be solved exactly using mathematical optimization solvers. Experimental results using two publicly available rating datasets demonstrate that our method can improve not only the recommendation accuracy but also the diversity of recommendations compared with conventional mean--variance portfolio optimization models. Notably, our method has the potential to improve the recommendation quality of various rating prediction algorithms.

6/18/2024

🛸

Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding

Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward Kennedy

Predictive algorithms inform consequential decisions in settings where the outcome is selectively observed given choices made by human decision makers. We propose a unified framework for the robust design and evaluation of predictive algorithms in selectively observed data. We impose general assumptions on how much the outcome may vary on average between unselected and selected units conditional on observed covariates and identified nuisance parameters, formalizing popular empirical strategies for imputing missing data such as proxy outcomes and instrumental variables. We develop debiased machine learning estimators for the bounds on a large class of predictive performance estimands, such as the conditional likelihood of the outcome, a predictive algorithm's mean square error, true/false positive rate, and many others, under these assumptions. In an administrative dataset from a large Australian financial institution, we illustrate how varying assumptions on unobserved confounding leads to meaningful changes in default risk predictions and evaluations of credit scores across sensitive groups.

5/21/2024