Generalization in the Face of Adaptivity: A Bayesian Perspective
2106.10761
0
0
🔮
Abstract
Repeated use of a data sample via adaptively chosen queries can rapidly lead to overfitting, wherein the empirical evaluation of queries on the sample significantly deviates from their mean with respect to the underlying data distribution. It turns out that simple noise addition algorithms suffice to prevent this issue, and differential privacy-based analysis of these algorithms shows that they can handle an asymptotically optimal number of queries. However, differential privacy's worst-case nature entails scaling such noise to the range of the queries even for highly-concentrated queries, or introducing more complex algorithms. In this paper, we prove that straightforward noise-addition algorithms already provide variance-dependent guarantees that also extend to unbounded queries. This improvement stems from a novel characterization that illuminates the core problem of adaptive data analysis. We show that the harm of adaptivity results from the covariance between the new query and a Bayes factor-based measure of how much information about the data sample was encoded in the responses given to past queries. We then leverage this characterization to introduce a new data-dependent stability notion that can bound this covariance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Adaptively choosing queries on a data sample can lead to overfitting, where the empirical evaluation of queries significantly deviates from the underlying data distribution.
- Simple noise addition algorithms can prevent this issue, and differential privacy-based analysis shows they can handle an optimal number of queries.
- However, differential privacy's worst-case nature requires scaling noise to the range of queries, even for highly-concentrated queries, or introducing more complex algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a common problem in data analysis called "overfitting." This happens when researchers repeatedly use the same data sample to test different queries or hypotheses. Over time, the results from these queries start to deviate significantly from the actual underlying data distribution, leading to inaccurate conclusions.
The researchers show that a simple solution - adding random noise to the data - can effectively prevent this overfitting problem. Differential privacy techniques can be used to analyze these noise-addition algorithms and prove that they can handle an optimal number of queries without causing issues.
However, the downside of differential privacy is that it takes a "worst-case" approach, meaning the noise has to be scaled to the full range of possible queries, even if the actual queries are more concentrated. This can lead to the need for more complex algorithms to achieve the same level of protection.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel characterization of the core problem behind adaptive data analysis. The key insight is that the harm of adaptivity stems from the covariance between a new query and a Bayes factor-based measure of how much information about the data sample was encoded in responses to past queries.
Building on this characterization, the researchers introduce a new data-dependent stability notion that can bound this covariance. This allows them to prove that straightforward noise-addition algorithms already provide variance-dependent guarantees that extend even to unbounded queries.
This improvement over previous differential privacy approaches is significant, as it avoids the need to scale noise to the full range of queries or use more complex algorithms, as required by the worst-case nature of differential privacy.
The paper's technical contributions build on related work in areas like generalized diffusion, learning under graph dependence, and understanding the influence of noise on generalization.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the overfitting problem in adaptive data analysis, with a novel characterization of the core issue and a theoretical analysis showing the benefits of straightforward noise-addition algorithms.
However, the paper does not provide any empirical validation of the proposed method, nor does it discuss potential limitations or areas for further research. It would be helpful to see how the method performs in practical scenarios and whether there are any edge cases or assumptions that could limit its applicability.
Additionally, while the technical explanation is well-grounded in relevant literature, the paper could benefit from more discussion of the broader context and implications of this research. How does it relate to other approaches to ensuring the reliability of adaptive data analysis, and what are the potential real-world applications and impacts?
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field, but further exploration and empirical validation would help strengthen the conclusions and broaden the understanding of the proposed techniques.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to preventing overfitting in adaptive data analysis, which is a common problem in many areas of research. By characterizing the core issue as the covariance between new queries and the information encoded in past responses, the researchers develop a data-dependent stability notion that allows straightforward noise-addition algorithms to provide strong guarantees.
This is a significant improvement over previous differential privacy-based techniques, which required more complex algorithms or scaling noise to the full range of queries. If validated and extended further, the methods described in this paper could help researchers and data analysts maintain the reliability of their findings in the face of adaptively chosen queries.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
Adaptive Data Analysis for Growing Data
Neil G. Marchant, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein
0
0
Reuse of data in adaptive workflows poses challenges regarding overfitting and the statistical validity of results. Previous work has demonstrated that interacting with data via differentially private algorithms can mitigate overfitting, achieving worst-case generalization guarantees with asymptotically optimal data requirements. However, such past work assumes data is static and cannot accommodate situations where data grows over time. In this paper we address this gap, presenting the first generalization bounds for adaptive analysis in the dynamic data setting. We allow the analyst to adaptively schedule their queries conditioned on the current size of the data, in addition to previous queries and responses. We also incorporate time-varying empirical accuracy bounds and mechanisms, allowing for tighter guarantees as data accumulates. In a batched query setting, the asymptotic data requirements of our bound grows with the square-root of the number of adaptive queries, matching prior works' improvement over data splitting for the static setting. We instantiate our bound for statistical queries with the clipped Gaussian mechanism, where it empirically outperforms baselines composed from static bounds.
5/24/2024
📊
A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guarantees
Christopher Jung, Katrina Ligett, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, Moshe Shenfeld
0
0
We give a new proof of the transfer theorem underlying adaptive data analysis: that any mechanism for answering adaptively chosen statistical queries that is differentially private and sample-accurate is also accurate out-of-sample. Our new proof is elementary and gives structural insights that we expect will be useful elsewhere. We show: 1) that differential privacy ensures that the expectation of any query on the posterior distribution on datasets induced by the transcript of the interaction is close to its true value on the data distribution, and 2) sample accuracy on its own ensures that any query answer produced by the mechanism is close to its posterior expectation with high probability. This second claim follows from a thought experiment in which we imagine that the dataset is resampled from the posterior distribution after the mechanism has committed to its answers. The transfer theorem then follows by summing these two bounds, and in particular, avoids the monitor argument used to derive high probability bounds in prior work. An upshot of our new proof technique is that the concrete bounds we obtain are substantially better than the best previously known bounds, even though the improvements are in the constants, rather than the asymptotics (which are known to be tight). As we show, our new bounds outperform the naive sample-splitting baseline at dramatically smaller dataset sizes compared to the previous state of the art, bringing techniques from this literature closer to practicality.
6/5/2024
🎲
Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimation
Samuel B. Hopkins, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Shyam Narayanan
0
0
We study the relationship between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional algorithmic statistics. We give the first black-box reduction from privacy to robustness which can produce private estimators with optimal tradeoffs among sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy for a wide range of fundamental high-dimensional parameter estimation problems, including mean and covariance estimation. We show that this reduction can be implemented in polynomial time in some important special cases. In particular, using nearly-optimal polynomial-time robust estimators for the mean and covariance of high-dimensional Gaussians which are based on the Sum-of-Squares method, we design the first polynomial-time private estimators for these problems with nearly-optimal samples-accuracy-privacy tradeoffs. Our algorithms are also robust to a nearly optimal fraction of adversarially-corrupted samples.
6/18/2024
Adaptive Online Bayesian Estimation of Frequency Distributions with Local Differential Privacy
Soner Aydin, Sinan Yildirim
0
0
We propose a novel Bayesian approach for the adaptive and online estimation of the frequency distribution of a finite number of categories under the local differential privacy (LDP) framework. The proposed algorithm performs Bayesian parameter estimation via posterior sampling and adapts the randomization mechanism for LDP based on the obtained posterior samples. We propose a randomized mechanism for LDP which uses a subset of categories as an input and whose performance depends on the selected subset and the true frequency distribution. By using the posterior sample as an estimate of the frequency distribution, the algorithm performs a computationally tractable subset selection step to maximize the utility of the privatized response of the next user. We propose several utility functions related to well-known information metrics, such as (but not limited to) Fisher information matrix, total variation distance, and information entropy. We compare each of these utility metrics in terms of their computational complexity. We employ stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics for posterior sampling, a computationally efficient approximate Markov chain Monte Carlo method. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that (i) the posterior distribution targeted by the algorithm converges to the true parameter even for approximate posterior sampling, and (ii) the algorithm selects the optimal subset with high probability if posterior sampling is performed exactly. We also provide numerical results that empirically demonstrate the estimation accuracy of our algorithm where we compare it with nonadaptive and semi-adaptive approaches under experimental settings with various combinations of privacy parameters and population distribution parameters.
5/14/2024