Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the connection between finite neural networks and Gaussian processes.
- It provides provable error bounds on the accuracy of finite neural networks as approximations of Gaussian processes.
- The paper also discusses how these insights can be used to guide the selection of priors for Bayesian neural networks.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks are a type of machine learning model inspired by the brain's neural structure. They are made up of interconnected nodes, or "neurons," that can learn to perform tasks by processing data.
Finite neural networks are neural networks with a fixed, limited number of neurons. This paper shows that these finite neural networks can be viewed as mixtures of Gaussian processes, which are powerful statistical models that can capture complex patterns in data.
The key insight is that as the number of neurons in a finite neural network grows, it can better approximate a Gaussian process. The paper provides mathematical guarantees on how accurately a finite neural network can approximate a Gaussian process, which is important for understanding the capabilities and limitations of these models.
Additionally, the paper discusses how this connection between finite neural networks and Gaussian processes can be used to guide the selection of priors when training Bayesian neural networks. Priors are the assumptions a model makes about the data before seeing it, and choosing the right priors is crucial for the model's performance.
Overall, this research helps bridge the gap between the theoretical understanding of Gaussian processes and the practical application of finite neural networks, with implications for improving the design and training of neural network models.
Technical Explanation
The paper establishes a formal connection between finite neural networks and Gaussian processes (GPs), which are powerful statistical models that can capture complex patterns in data.
The key result is that as the number of neurons in a finite neural network grows, it can better approximate a GP. Specifically, the authors prove that the error between a finite neural network and a GP can be bounded by a term that goes to zero as the number of neurons increases.
This connection allows the authors to leverage the well-understood theory of GPs to gain insights about the behavior of finite neural networks. For example, they use this connection to derive provable error bounds on the approximation quality of finite neural networks as they approach the GP limit.
Furthermore, the authors show how this GP perspective on finite neural networks can be used to guide the selection of priors when training Bayesian neural networks. Priors are the assumptions a model makes about the data before seeing it, and choosing the right priors is crucial for the model's performance.
The paper demonstrates these ideas through both theoretical analysis and numerical experiments, providing a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between finite neural networks and Gaussian processes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable theoretical contribution by formally establishing the connection between finite neural networks and Gaussian processes. This connection allows the authors to leverage the well-developed theory of GPs to gain new insights about the behavior of finite neural networks.
One potential limitation of the work is that the theoretical analysis focuses on the idealized setting of infinite-width neural networks. In practice, neural networks have a finite width, and it would be interesting to understand how the results scale to more realistic network architectures.
Additionally, the paper primarily considers single-layer neural networks. It would be informative to extend the analysis to deeper, multi-layer networks, which are more commonly used in modern machine learning applications.
Another area for further research could be to investigate the practical implications of using the GP perspective to guide the selection of priors for Bayesian neural networks. The paper provides the theoretical foundation, but more empirical work may be needed to fully understand the benefits and limitations of this approach in real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper establishes a formal connection between finite neural networks and Gaussian processes, providing a new lens through which to study the behavior of these powerful machine learning models. The key insights include provable error bounds on the accuracy of finite neural networks as approximations of GPs, as well as guidelines for selecting priors in Bayesian neural networks.
These results help bridge the gap between the theoretical understanding of Gaussian processes and the practical application of finite neural networks, with potential implications for improving the design and training of neural network models. The work also opens up new directions for future research, such as extending the analysis to deeper architectures and exploring the practical benefits of the GP perspective on Bayesian neural network priors.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection
Steven Adams, Patan`e, Morteza Lahijanian, Luca Laurenti
Infinitely wide or deep neural networks (NNs) with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) parameters have been shown to be equivalent to Gaussian processes. Because of the favorable properties of Gaussian processes, this equivalence is commonly employed to analyze neural networks and has led to various breakthroughs over the years. However, neural networks and Gaussian processes are equivalent only in the limit; in the finite case there are currently no methods available to approximate a trained neural network with a Gaussian model with bounds on the approximation error. In this work, we present an algorithmic framework to approximate a neural network of finite width and depth, and with not necessarily i.i.d. parameters, with a mixture of Gaussian processes with error bounds on the approximation error. In particular, we consider the Wasserstein distance to quantify the closeness between probabilistic models and, by relying on tools from optimal transport and Gaussian processes, we iteratively approximate the output distribution of each layer of the neural network as a mixture of Gaussian processes. Crucially, for any NN and $epsilon >0$ our approach is able to return a mixture of Gaussian processes that is $epsilon$-close to the NN at a finite set of input points. Furthermore, we rely on the differentiability of the resulting error bound to show how our approach can be employed to tune the parameters of a NN to mimic the functional behavior of a given Gaussian process, e.g., for prior selection in the context of Bayesian inference. We empirically investigate the effectiveness of our results on both regression and classification problems with various neural network architectures. Our experiments highlight how our results can represent an important step towards understanding neural network predictions and formally quantifying their uncertainty.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Random ReLU Neural Networks as Non-Gaussian Processes
Rahul Parhi, Pakshal Bohra, Ayoub El Biari, Mehrsa Pourya, Michael Unser
We consider a large class of shallow neural networks with randomly initialized parameters and rectified linear unit activation functions. We prove that these random neural networks are well-defined non-Gaussian processes. As a by-product, we demonstrate that these networks are solutions to stochastic differential equations driven by impulsive white noise (combinations of random Dirac measures). These processes are parameterized by the law of the weights and biases as well as the density of activation thresholds in each bounded region of the input domain. We prove that these processes are isotropic and wide-sense self-similar with Hurst exponent $3/2$. We also derive a remarkably simple closed-form expression for their autocovariance function. Our results are fundamentally different from prior work in that we consider a non-asymptotic viewpoint: The number of neurons in each bounded region of the input domain (i.e., the width) is itself a random variable with a Poisson law with mean proportional to the density parameter. Finally, we show that, under suitable hypotheses, as the expected width tends to infinity, these processes can converge in law not only to Gaussian processes, but also to non-Gaussian processes depending on the law of the weights. Our asymptotic results provide a new take on several classical results (wide networks converge to Gaussian processes) as well as some new ones (wide networks can converge to non-Gaussian processes).
Read more5/17/2024
🤯
0
Posterior Inference on Shallow Infinitely Wide Bayesian Neural Networks under Weights with Unbounded Variance
Jorge Lor'ia, Anindya Bhadra
From the classical and influential works of Neal (1996), it is known that the infinite width scaling limit of a Bayesian neural network with one hidden layer is a Gaussian process, when the network weights have bounded prior variance. Neal's result has been extended to networks with multiple hidden layers and to convolutional neural networks, also with Gaussian process scaling limits. The tractable properties of Gaussian processes then allow straightforward posterior inference and uncertainty quantification, considerably simplifying the study of the limit process compared to a network of finite width. Neural network weights with unbounded variance, however, pose unique challenges. In this case, the classical central limit theorem breaks down and it is well known that the scaling limit is an $alpha$-stable process under suitable conditions. However, current literature is primarily limited to forward simulations under these processes and the problem of posterior inference under such a scaling limit remains largely unaddressed, unlike in the Gaussian process case. To this end, our contribution is an interpretable and computationally efficient procedure for posterior inference, using a conditionally Gaussian representation, that then allows full use of the Gaussian process machinery for tractable posterior inference and uncertainty quantification in the non-Gaussian regime.
Read more6/6/2024
🤿
0
Quantitative CLTs in Deep Neural Networks
Stefano Favaro, Boris Hanin, Domenico Marinucci, Ivan Nourdin, Giovanni Peccati
We study the distribution of a fully connected neural network with random Gaussian weights and biases in which the hidden layer widths are proportional to a large constant $n$. Under mild assumptions on the non-linearity, we obtain quantitative bounds on normal approximations valid at large but finite $n$ and any fixed network depth. Our theorems show both for the finite-dimensional distributions and the entire process, that the distance between a random fully connected network (and its derivatives) to the corresponding infinite width Gaussian process scales like $n^{-gamma}$ for $gamma>0$, with the exponent depending on the metric used to measure discrepancy. Our bounds are strictly stronger in terms of their dependence on network width than any previously available in the literature; in the one-dimensional case, we also prove that they are optimal, i.e., we establish matching lower bounds.
Read more6/18/2024