Quantitative CLTs in Deep Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2307.06092 - Published 6/18/2024 by Stefano Favaro, Boris Hanin, Domenico Marinucci, Ivan Nourdin, Giovanni Peccati

🤿

Overview

This paper explores the use of quantitative central limit theorems (CLTs) to understand the behavior of deep neural networks.
The authors focus on the distribution of the activations in deep neural networks with random weights, drawing connections to prior work on random ReLU neural networks, feature learning and generalization in deep networks, and central limit theorems for Bayesian neural networks.
The paper provides theoretical insights into the asymptotic behavior of deep neural networks, with potential implications for posterior inference in shallow, infinitely wide Bayesian neural networks and the asymptotics of learning deep structured random features.

Plain English Explanation

This research paper explores how the mathematical concept of the central limit theorem (CLT) can be used to understand the behavior of deep neural networks. The CLT is a fundamental result in probability theory that describes how the sum of many independent random variables tends to follow a normal (or Gaussian) distribution, even if the individual variables do not.

The authors focus on deep neural networks with random, or untrained, weights. They show how the distribution of the activations (the outputs of the neurons) in these networks can be analyzed using quantitative CLTs. This builds on previous work on random ReLU neural networks, which found that the activations in these networks do not follow a normal distribution, and feature learning and generalization in deep networks, which explored the role of the network architecture in shaping the distribution of activations.

The paper's theoretical insights have potential implications for other areas of deep learning research, such as central limit theorems for Bayesian neural networks, posterior inference in shallow, infinitely wide Bayesian neural networks, and the asymptotics of learning deep structured random features. By understanding the mathematical properties of deep neural networks, researchers can gain new insights into how these powerful models work and how they can be improved.

Technical Explanation

The core focus of this paper is on using quantitative central limit theorems (CLTs) to analyze the behavior of deep neural networks with random weights. The authors build on previous work that has explored the statistical properties of neural network activations, such as the finding that the activations in random ReLU neural networks do not follow a normal distribution.

The key idea is to leverage the CLT to understand how the distribution of activations in deep networks changes as the depth of the network increases. The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the convergence of these distributions to Gaussian limits, as well as the rate of this convergence. This sheds light on the role of the network architecture, such as the choice of activation function and weight initialization, in shaping the distribution of activations.

The paper's theoretical insights have implications for several other areas of deep learning research. For example, the authors discuss how their results relate to the central limit theorem for Bayesian neural networks, as well as the asymptotic behavior of learning deep structured random features. They also touch on the potential relevance of their findings for posterior inference in shallow, infinitely wide Bayesian neural networks.

Overall, this paper provides a mathematically rigorous treatment of the statistical properties of deep neural networks, with the goal of advancing our fundamental understanding of these powerful machine learning models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough theoretical analysis of the distribution of activations in deep neural networks with random weights, leveraging the central limit theorem. This is a valuable contribution to the field, as it helps to deepen our understanding of the mathematical properties of these models.

One potential limitation of the work is that it focuses solely on networks with random weights, rather than considering the case of trained networks. While the insights gained from this analysis can provide useful intuitions, it would be interesting to see if and how the results extend to the more realistic scenario of trained models.

Additionally, the paper does not address the practical implications of its findings. It would be helpful to see a discussion of how this theoretical understanding could be leveraged to inform the design of neural network architectures or training procedures, or to enhance our ability to interpret and explain the behavior of deep learning models.

Finally, the paper could have provided a more comprehensive review of the relevant prior work in this area. While it does reference a few key related studies, a more thorough survey of the literature would help to better situate the current work within the broader context of deep learning research.

Overall, this paper offers important theoretical insights, but there is still room for further exploration of the practical applications and broader implications of this line of research.

Conclusion

This research paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the behavior of deep neural networks with random weights, using the concept of quantitative central limit theorems. The authors demonstrate how the distribution of activations in these networks can be characterized and how it changes as the depth of the network increases.

The theoretical insights gained from this work have the potential to advance our fundamental understanding of deep learning models, with implications for related areas of research such as Bayesian neural networks and the learning of deep structured random features. By exploring the statistical properties of neural networks, researchers can gain new perspectives on how these powerful models work and how they can be further improved.

While the paper focuses on the case of randomly initialized networks, future work could explore the extension of these results to the more realistic scenario of trained models. Additionally, a closer examination of the practical applications and implications of this theoretical understanding could help to bridge the gap between the mathematical and applied aspects of deep learning research.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Quantitative CLTs in Deep Neural Networks

Stefano Favaro, Boris Hanin, Domenico Marinucci, Ivan Nourdin, Giovanni Peccati

We study the distribution of a fully connected neural network with random Gaussian weights and biases in which the hidden layer widths are proportional to a large constant $n$. Under mild assumptions on the non-linearity, we obtain quantitative bounds on normal approximations valid at large but finite $n$ and any fixed network depth. Our theorems show both for the finite-dimensional distributions and the entire process, that the distance between a random fully connected network (and its derivatives) to the corresponding infinite width Gaussian process scales like $n^{-gamma}$ for $gamma>0$, with the exponent depending on the metric used to measure discrepancy. Our bounds are strictly stronger in terms of their dependence on network width than any previously available in the literature; in the one-dimensional case, we also prove that they are optimal, i.e., we establish matching lower bounds.

6/18/2024

Random ReLU Neural Networks as Non-Gaussian Processes

Rahul Parhi, Pakshal Bohra, Ayoub El Biari, Mehrsa Pourya, Michael Unser

We consider a large class of shallow neural networks with randomly initialized parameters and rectified linear unit activation functions. We prove that these random neural networks are well-defined non-Gaussian processes. As a by-product, we demonstrate that these networks are solutions to stochastic differential equations driven by impulsive white noise (combinations of random Dirac measures). These processes are parameterized by the law of the weights and biases as well as the density of activation thresholds in each bounded region of the input domain. We prove that these processes are isotropic and wide-sense self-similar with Hurst exponent $3/2$. We also derive a remarkably simple closed-form expression for their autocovariance function. Our results are fundamentally different from prior work in that we consider a non-asymptotic viewpoint: The number of neurons in each bounded region of the input domain (i.e., the width) is itself a random variable with a Poisson law with mean proportional to the density parameter. Finally, we show that, under suitable hypotheses, as the expected width tends to infinity, these processes can converge in law not only to Gaussian processes, but also to non-Gaussian processes depending on the law of the weights. Our asymptotic results provide a new take on several classical results (wide networks converge to Gaussian processes) as well as some new ones (wide networks can converge to non-Gaussian processes).

5/17/2024

Finite Neural Networks as Mixtures of Gaussian Processes: From Provable Error Bounds to Prior Selection

Steven Adams, Patan`e, Morteza Lahijanian, Luca Laurenti

Infinitely wide or deep neural networks (NNs) with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) parameters have been shown to be equivalent to Gaussian processes. Because of the favorable properties of Gaussian processes, this equivalence is commonly employed to analyze neural networks and has led to various breakthroughs over the years. However, neural networks and Gaussian processes are equivalent only in the limit; in the finite case there are currently no methods available to approximate a trained neural network with a Gaussian model with bounds on the approximation error. In this work, we present an algorithmic framework to approximate a neural network of finite width and depth, and with not necessarily i.i.d. parameters, with a mixture of Gaussian processes with error bounds on the approximation error. In particular, we consider the Wasserstein distance to quantify the closeness between probabilistic models and, by relying on tools from optimal transport and Gaussian processes, we iteratively approximate the output distribution of each layer of the neural network as a mixture of Gaussian processes. Crucially, for any NN and $epsilon >0$ our approach is able to return a mixture of Gaussian processes that is $epsilon$-close to the NN at a finite set of input points. Furthermore, we rely on the differentiability of the resulting error bound to show how our approach can be employed to tune the parameters of a NN to mimic the functional behavior of a given Gaussian process, e.g., for prior selection in the context of Bayesian inference. We empirically investigate the effectiveness of our results on both regression and classification problems with various neural network architectures. Our experiments highlight how our results can represent an important step towards understanding neural network predictions and formally quantifying their uncertainty.

7/29/2024

Feature Learning and Generalization in Deep Networks with Orthogonal Weights

Hannah Day, Yonatan Kahn, Daniel A. Roberts

Fully-connected deep neural networks with weights initialized from independent Gaussian distributions can be tuned to criticality, which prevents the exponential growth or decay of signals propagating through the network. However, such networks still exhibit fluctuations that grow linearly with the depth of the network, which may impair the training of networks with width comparable to depth. We show analytically that rectangular networks with tanh activations and weights initialized from the ensemble of orthogonal matrices have corresponding preactivation fluctuations which are independent of depth, to leading order in inverse width. Moreover, we demonstrate numerically that, at initialization, all correlators involving the neural tangent kernel (NTK) and its descendants at leading order in inverse width -- which govern the evolution of observables during training -- saturate at a depth of $sim 20$, rather than growing without bound as in the case of Gaussian initializations. We speculate that this structure preserves finite-width feature learning while reducing overall noise, thus improving both generalization and training speed in deep networks with depth comparable to width. We provide some experimental justification by relating empirical measurements of the NTK to the superior performance of deep nonlinear orthogonal networks trained under full-batch gradient descent on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 classification tasks.

6/13/2024