Finite-Sample Guarantees for Best-Response Learning Dynamics in Zero-Sum Matrix Games

Read original: arXiv:2407.20128 - Published 7/30/2024 by Fathima Zarin Faizal, Asuman Ozdaglar, Martin J. Wainwright
Total Score

0

🔗

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper examines a new approach to learning the dynamics of zero-sum games.
  • It proposes a method for efficiently learning the Nash equilibria in zero-sum Markov games.
  • The research explores state-constrained zero-sum differential games and presents algorithms for finding local Nash equilibria.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on improving our understanding and ability to solve zero-sum games, which are a type of game where one player's gain is the other player's loss. These games have important applications in areas like economics, politics, and even artificial intelligence.

The researchers present several new techniques for more efficiently learning the dynamics and equilibria in these types of games. For example, they develop a method for learning the Nash equilibria - the set of strategies where neither player can unilaterally improve their outcome - in zero-sum Markov games, which are a broader class of games that incorporate the notion of state.

They also explore state-constrained zero-sum differential games, which add additional constraints on the allowable states in the game. And they introduce algorithms for finding local Nash equilibria - solutions that are optimal within a neighborhood, rather than globally.

The key insights of this work are new techniques that can model the complex dynamics of zero-sum games more accurately and efficiently. This could have important implications for fields that rely on game theory, like economics, policy analysis, and the development of AI systems that need to operate in adversarial environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper first presents a method for efficiently learning the Nash equilibria in zero-sum Markov games. The approach leverages the structure of these games to speed up the process of finding the equilibrium strategies for each player.

Next, the researchers explore state-constrained zero-sum differential games, which add additional constraints on the allowable states in the game. They develop theory and algorithms for analyzing these more complex games.

Finally, the paper introduces algorithms for finding local Nash equilibria in general zero-sum games. These solutions are optimal within a neighborhood, rather than globally, which can be more computationally tractable.

Throughout the work, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed methods through theoretical analysis and numerical experiments.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several important contributions to the field of game theory and its applications. The techniques developed could allow for more accurate modeling of real-world strategic interactions, which have important implications.

However, the research also has some limitations. For example, the analysis of state-constrained zero-sum differential games relies on several simplifying assumptions that may not hold in all practical scenarios. Additionally, the algorithms for finding local Nash equilibria, while computationally efficient, may not always converge to the globally optimal solution.

Further research could explore relaxing some of these assumptions, as well as investigating the performance of the proposed methods on larger-scale, more complex game instances. Validating the techniques on real-world case studies would also help demonstrate their practical utility.

Conclusion

This paper presents innovative approaches for learning the dynamics and equilibria of zero-sum games. The key contributions include methods for efficiently finding Nash equilibria in zero-sum Markov games, analyzing state-constrained zero-sum differential games, and identifying local Nash equilibria in general zero-sum games.

These advancements could have significant implications for fields that rely on game theory, such as economics, policy analysis, and the development of AI systems that need to operate in adversarial environments. While the research has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in our understanding and modeling of these complex strategic interactions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔗

Total Score

0

Finite-Sample Guarantees for Best-Response Learning Dynamics in Zero-Sum Matrix Games

Fathima Zarin Faizal, Asuman Ozdaglar, Martin J. Wainwright

We study best-response type learning dynamics for two player zero-sum matrix games. We consider two settings that are distinguished by the type of information that each player has about the game and their opponent's strategy. The first setting is the full information case, in which each player knows their own and the opponent's payoff matrices and observes the opponent's mixed strategy. The second setting is the minimal information case, where players do not observe the opponent's strategy and are not aware of either of the payoff matrices (instead they only observe their realized payoffs). For this setting, also known as the radically uncoupled case in the learning in games literature, we study a two-timescale learning dynamics that combine smoothed best-response type updates for strategy estimates with a TD-learning update to estimate a local payoff function. For these dynamics, without additional exploration, we provide polynomial-time finite-sample guarantees for convergence to an $epsilon$-Nash equilibrium.

Read more

7/30/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Last-Iterate Convergence of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

Zaiwei Chen, Kaiqing Zhang, Eric Mazumdar, Asuman Ozdaglar, Adam Wierman

In this paper, we consider two-player zero-sum matrix and stochastic games and develop learning dynamics that are payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric between the two players. Specifically, the learning dynamics for matrix games are based on the smoothed best-response dynamics, while the learning dynamics for stochastic games build upon those for matrix games, with additional incorporation of the minimax value iteration. To our knowledge, our theoretical results present the first finite-sample analysis of such learning dynamics with last-iterate guarantees. In the matrix game setting, the results imply a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-1})$ to find the Nash distribution and a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-8})$ to find a Nash equilibrium. In the stochastic game setting, the results also imply a sample complexity of $O(epsilon^{-8})$ to find a Nash equilibrium. To establish these results, the main challenge is to handle stochastic approximation algorithms with multiple sets of coupled and stochastic iterates that evolve on (possibly) different time scales. To overcome this challenge, we developed a coupled Lyapunov-based approach, which may be of independent interest to the broader community studying the convergence behavior of stochastic approximation algorithms.

Read more

9/6/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Global Behavior of Learning Dynamics in Zero-Sum Games with Memory Asymmetry

Yuma Fujimoto, Kaito Ariu, Kenshi Abe

This study examines the global behavior of dynamics in learning in games between two players, X and Y. We consider the simplest situation for memory asymmetry between two players: X memorizes the other Y's previous action and uses reactive strategies, while Y has no memory. Although this memory complicates the learning dynamics, we discover two novel quantities that characterize the global behavior of such complex dynamics. One is an extended Kullback-Leibler divergence from the Nash equilibrium, a well-known conserved quantity from previous studies. The other is a family of Lyapunov functions of X's reactive strategy. These two quantities capture the global behavior in which X's strategy becomes more exploitative, and the exploited Y's strategy converges to the Nash equilibrium. Indeed, we theoretically prove that Y's strategy globally converges to the Nash equilibrium in the simplest game equipped with an equilibrium in the interior of strategy spaces. Furthermore, our experiments also suggest that this global convergence is universal for more advanced zero-sum games than the simplest game. This study provides a novel characterization of the global behavior of learning in games through a couple of indicators.

Read more

5/24/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

Learning Nash Equilibria in Zero-Sum Markov Games: A Single Time-scale Algorithm Under Weak Reachability

Reda Ouhamma, Maryam Kamgarpour

We consider decentralized learning for zero-sum games, where players only see their payoff information and are agnostic to actions and payoffs of the opponent. Previous works demonstrated convergence to a Nash equilibrium in this setting using double time-scale algorithms under strong reachability assumptions. We address the open problem of achieving an approximate Nash equilibrium efficiently with an uncoupled and single time-scale algorithm under weaker conditions. Our contribution is a rational and convergent algorithm, utilizing Tsallis-entropy regularization in a value-iteration-based approach. The algorithm learns an approximate Nash equilibrium in polynomial time, requiring only the existence of a policy pair that induces an irreducible and aperiodic Markov chain, thus considerably weakening past assumptions. Our analysis leverages negative drift inequalities and introduces novel properties of Tsallis entropy that are of independent interest.

Read more

5/27/2024