Finite-Time Error Bounds for Greedy-GQ
2209.02555
0
0
👀
Abstract
Greedy-GQ with linear function approximation, originally proposed in cite{maei2010toward}, is a value-based off-policy algorithm for optimal control in reinforcement learning, and it has a non-linear two timescale structure with the non-convex objective function. This paper develops its tightest finite-time error bounds. We show that the Greedy-GQ algorithm converges as fast as $mathcal{O}({1}/{sqrt{T}})$ under the i.i.d. setting and $mathcal{O}({log T}/{sqrt{T}})$ under the Markovian setting. We further design a variant of the vanilla Greedy-GQ algorithm using the nested-loop approach, and show that its sample complexity is $mathcal{O}({log(1/epsilon)epsilon^{-2}})$, which matches with the one of the vanilla Greedy-GQ. Our finite-time error bounds match with one of the stochastic gradient descent algorithms for general smooth non-convex optimization problems, despite its additonal challenge in the two time-scale updates. Our finite-sample analysis provides theoretical guidance on choosing step-sizes for faster convergence in practice, and suggests the trade-off between the convergence rate and the quality of the obtained policy. Our techniques provide a general approach for finite-sample analysis of non-convex two timescale value-based reinforcement learning algorithms.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Greedy-GQ is a value-based off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm for optimal control
- It has a non-linear two-timescale structure with a non-convex objective function
- This paper develops the tightest finite-time error bounds for Greedy-GQ
Plain English Explanation
Greedy-GQ is a machine learning algorithm used in reinforcement learning, which is a type of AI that learns by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards. Reinforcement learning is often used to train agents, like robots or virtual characters, to perform tasks optimally.
The Greedy-GQ algorithm is a specific type of reinforcement learning algorithm that is designed to find the best way to act in a given environment, even when the environment is complex and the optimal action is not obvious. It has a unique two-part structure that allows it to learn quickly and efficiently.
This paper analyzes Greedy-GQ in more detail and provides the tightest possible bounds on how quickly the algorithm can learn and converge to the optimal solution. The authors show that Greedy-GQ can learn as quickly as other popular optimization algorithms, despite the additional challenges it faces due to its two-part structure.
Technical Explanation
The Greedy-GQ algorithm is a value-based off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm for optimal control. It has a non-linear two-timescale structure, meaning it updates its parameters at two different rates, and its objective function is non-convex, which makes it more challenging to optimize.
This paper develops the tightest finite-time error bounds for the Greedy-GQ algorithm. The authors show that Greedy-GQ converges as fast as O(1/√T) under the i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) setting, and as fast as O(log T/√T) under the Markovian setting. They also design a variant of Greedy-GQ using a nested-loop approach and show that its sample complexity is O(log(1/ε)/ε^2), which matches the sample complexity of the original Greedy-GQ algorithm.
The authors' techniques provide a general approach for finite-sample analysis of non-convex, two-timescale value-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Their finite-time error bounds match those of stochastic gradient descent algorithms for general smooth non-convex optimization problems, despite the additional challenges posed by Greedy-GQ's two-timescale structure.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the Greedy-GQ algorithm and its performance guarantees. However, it is important to note that the analysis is based on several assumptions, such as the environment being Markovian and the function approximation being linear. In practice, real-world environments may not always satisfy these assumptions, and the algorithm's performance may be affected.
Additionally, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation of the Greedy-GQ algorithm or its variant. It would be helpful to see how the algorithm performs in practical applications and how it compares to other reinforcement learning algorithms, especially in terms of sample efficiency and practical convergence.
Overall, the paper presents valuable theoretical insights and provides a solid foundation for understanding the Greedy-GQ algorithm. However, further empirical validation and exploration of the algorithm's performance in more realistic scenarios would be beneficial for the reinforcement learning community.
Conclusion
This paper analyzes the Greedy-GQ reinforcement learning algorithm and provides the tightest finite-time error bounds for its convergence. The authors show that Greedy-GQ can converge as quickly as other popular optimization algorithms, despite the additional challenges posed by its two-timescale structure and non-convex objective function.
The theoretical insights presented in this paper can guide practitioners in choosing appropriate step-sizes and tradeoffs between convergence rate and policy quality when using the Greedy-GQ algorithm. The authors' techniques also offer a general approach for analyzing the finite-sample performance of other non-convex, two-timescale reinforcement learning algorithms, which could lead to further advancements in the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Fast Two-Time-Scale Stochastic Gradient Method with Applications in Reinforcement Learning
Sihan Zeng, Thinh T. Doan
0
0
Two-time-scale optimization is a framework introduced in Zeng et al. (2024) that abstracts a range of policy evaluation and policy optimization problems in reinforcement learning (RL). Akin to bi-level optimization under a particular type of stochastic oracle, the two-time-scale optimization framework has an upper level objective whose gradient evaluation depends on the solution of a lower level problem, which is to find the root of a strongly monotone operator. In this work, we propose a new method for solving two-time-scale optimization that achieves significantly faster convergence than the prior arts. The key idea of our approach is to leverage an averaging step to improve the estimates of the operators in both lower and upper levels before using them to update the decision variables. These additional averaging steps eliminate the direct coupling between the main variables, enabling the accelerated performance of our algorithm. We characterize the finite-time convergence rates of the proposed algorithm under various conditions of the underlying objective function, including strong convexity, convexity, Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition, and general non-convexity. These rates significantly improve over the best-known complexity of the standard two-time-scale stochastic approximation algorithm. When applied to RL, we show how the proposed algorithm specializes to novel online sample-based methods that surpass or match the performance of the existing state of the art. Finally, we support our theoretical results with numerical simulations in RL.
6/11/2024
🔗
Finite-Time Error Analysis of Soft Q-Learning: Switching System Approach
Narim Jeong, Donghwan Lee
0
0
Soft Q-learning is a variation of Q-learning designed to solve entropy regularized Markov decision problems where an agent aims to maximize the entropy regularized value function. Despite its empirical success, there have been limited theoretical studies of soft Q-learning to date. This paper aims to offer a novel and unified finite-time, control-theoretic analysis of soft Q-learning algorithms. We focus on two types of soft Q-learning algorithms: one utilizing the log-sum-exp operator and the other employing the Boltzmann operator. By using dynamical switching system models, we derive novel finite-time error bounds for both soft Q-learning algorithms. We hope that our analysis will deepen the current understanding of soft Q-learning by establishing connections with switching system models and may even pave the way for new frameworks in the finite-time analysis of other reinforcement learning algorithms.
6/19/2024
📶
High-probability sample complexities for policy evaluation with linear function approximation
Gen Li, Weichen Wu, Yuejie Chi, Cong Ma, Alessandro Rinaldo, Yuting Wei
0
0
This paper is concerned with the problem of policy evaluation with linear function approximation in discounted infinite horizon Markov decision processes. We investigate the sample complexities required to guarantee a predefined estimation error of the best linear coefficients for two widely-used policy evaluation algorithms: the temporal difference (TD) learning algorithm and the two-timescale linear TD with gradient correction (TDC) algorithm. In both the on-policy setting, where observations are generated from the target policy, and the off-policy setting, where samples are drawn from a behavior policy potentially different from the target policy, we establish the first sample complexity bound with high-probability convergence guarantee that attains the optimal dependence on the tolerance level. We also exhihit an explicit dependence on problem-related quantities, and show in the on-policy setting that our upper bound matches the minimax lower bound on crucial problem parameters, including the choice of the feature maps and the problem dimension.
5/3/2024
An Optimal Tightness Bound for the Simulation Lemma
Sam Lobel, Ronald Parr
0
0
We present a bound for value-prediction error with respect to model misspecification that is tight, including constant factors. This is a direct improvement of the simulation lemma, a foundational result in reinforcement learning. We demonstrate that existing bounds are quite loose, becoming vacuous for large discount factors, due to the suboptimal treatment of compounding probability errors. By carefully considering this quantity on its own, instead of as a subcomponent of value error, we derive a bound that is sub-linear with respect to transition function misspecification. We then demonstrate broader applicability of this technique, improving a similar bound in the related subfield of hierarchical abstraction.
6/26/2024