High-probability sample complexities for policy evaluation with linear function approximation

Overview

• This paper investigates the sample complexities required to ensure a predefined estimation error for two widely-used policy evaluation algorithms in Markov decision processes (MDPs): temporal difference (TD) learning and two-timescale linear TD with gradient correction (TDC).
• The analysis is conducted in both the on-policy setting, where observations are generated from the target policy, and the off-policy setting, where samples are drawn from a behavior policy different from the target policy.
• The authors establish the first sample complexity bounds with high-probability convergence guarantees that achieve optimal dependence on the tolerance level, and they also show explicit dependence on problem-related quantities.
• In the on-policy setting, the authors demonstrate that their upper bound matches the minimax lower bound on crucial problem parameters, including the choice of feature maps and problem dimension.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers are interested in understanding how much data (or "samples") is needed to accurately estimate the best linear coefficients for two popular reinforcement learning algorithms: temporal difference (TD) learning and two-timescale linear TD with gradient correction (TDC).

They consider two scenarios: the "on-policy" setting, where the data comes from the target policy you want to evaluate, and the "off-policy" setting, where the data comes from a different behavior policy. The researchers establish bounds on the number of samples needed to get a good estimate, and show that in the on-policy case, their upper bound matches the best possible lower bound.

This is important because it helps us understand the fundamental limits of how much data is required for these algorithms to work well, which can inform the design of more efficient reinforcement learning systems and sample-efficient learning approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the sample complexities required to guarantee a predefined estimation error for two widely-used policy evaluation algorithms in discounted infinite horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with linear function approximation:

1. Temporal Difference (TD) Learning: A classic algorithm for estimating the value function of a policy.
2. Two-Timescale Linear TD with Gradient Correction (TDC): An extension of TD learning that uses a two-timescale update and gradient correction to improve performance.

The analysis is performed in both the on-policy setting, where the observations are generated from the target policy, and the off-policy setting, where samples are drawn from a behavior policy that may differ from the target policy.

For both algorithms and both settings, the authors establish the first sample complexity bounds with high-probability convergence guarantees that achieve the optimal dependence on the tolerance level. They also provide an explicit characterization of the dependence on problem-related quantities, such as the feature map, the problem dimension, and other relevant parameters.

Importantly, in the on-policy setting, the authors show that their upper bound on the sample complexity matches the minimax lower bound on crucial problem parameters, including the choice of feature maps and the problem dimension. This implies that their analysis is tight and cannot be substantially improved.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous and comprehensive theoretical analysis of the sample complexities required for policy evaluation with linear function approximation in discounted infinite horizon MDPs. The authors' results are technically sound and make important contributions to the understanding of the fundamental limits of these algorithms.

However, it's worth noting that the analysis assumes a specific MDP structure and makes several simplifying assumptions, such as the linearity of the value function and the availability of a generative model for sampling. In practice, these assumptions may not always hold, and the performance of the algorithms may differ from the theoretical guarantees.

Furthermore, the paper focuses solely on the sample complexity aspect and does not consider other important factors, such as the computational complexity of the algorithms or their practical implementation challenges. Additionally, the analysis is limited to the discounted infinite horizon setting and may not directly apply to other problem settings, such as average-reward or finite-horizon MDPs.

Nonetheless, the insights and techniques developed in this paper can serve as a foundation for further research in this area, potentially leading to the development of more efficient and robust reinforcement learning algorithms. Researchers and practitioners working on reinforcement learning should carefully consider the implications of this work and explore ways to extend or adapt the analysis to address real-world challenges.

Conclusion

This paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the sample complexities required for policy evaluation with linear function approximation in discounted infinite horizon Markov decision processes. The authors establish the first high-probability sample complexity bounds for two widely-used algorithms, TD learning and TDC, in both the on-policy and off-policy settings.

The results demonstrate the optimal dependence on the tolerance level and provide explicit characterizations of the dependence on problem-related quantities, such as the feature maps and problem dimension. Importantly, the authors show that their upper bound for the on-policy setting matches the minimax lower bound, indicating the tightness of their analysis.

These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the fundamental limits of these policy evaluation algorithms and can inform the design of more efficient reinforcement learning systems and sample-efficient learning approaches. While the analysis is limited to certain assumptions, the techniques and insights developed in this paper can serve as a foundation for further research in this area, potentially leading to the development of more robust and practical reinforcement learning solutions.